What you should know is that Trouble has just passed S&T
maybe Scream and Shout will pass it next
Source
They raise some interesting points. This one in particular was my favorite:
"The possibility that shes an extremely powerful woman who works in a sexist industry ... and is constantly navigating how to assert her own agency while resisting/accommodating/subverting the worlds expectations of her is not entertained."
Discuss.
Why am I not the least bit surprised that girl takes everything too seriously. I don't even like Minaj's music but she's fairly entertaining as a judge.@MarinasDiamonds: Nicki Minaj is unbearable
I don't trust popgaf to be able to have a thorough and meaningful discussion about feminism, womanism, intersectionality, the recognition of female agency, and sexuality as it pertains to the ownership of the self, Koodo.
Do you?
but i appreciate that some here understand that feminism doesn't necessarily have to come fully clothed
There is no discussion to be had. Beyonce has never claimed to be a feminist, therefore the article that is being criticized by the above blogpost is wrong.
Had the article talked about Beyonce's hypocrisy, stealing, or how bad of an album "4" was... then it would have been right. However, as it stands, that article is just the squawking of a judgmental pseudo-feminist.
Did I lie?
There is no discussion to be had. Beyonce has never claimed to be a feminist, therefore the article that is being criticized by the above blogpost is wrong.
Had the article talked about Beyonce's hypocrisy, stealing, or how bad of an album "4" was... then it would have been right. However, as it stands, that article is just the squawking of a judgmental pseudo-feminist.
Did I lie?
Did I lie?
So I enter to see botty talking BS AGAIN!!
ooop, clocked
QUEEN LAKEIFA!!!!!!So I enter to see botty talking BS AGAIN!!
So I enter to see botty talking BS AGAIN!!
The whole bleaching thing is just stupid - just coz she's black, does it mean she has to be jet black. She has always been very light-skinned. Look at her mum.
So I enter to see botty talking BS AGAIN!!
The whole bleaching thing is just stupid - just coz she's black, does it mean she has to be jet black. She has always been very light-skinned. Look at her mum.
Yes.
So I enter to see botty talking BS AGAIN!!
The whole bleaching thing is just stupid - just coz she's black, does it mean she has to be jet black. She has always been very light-skinned. Look at her mum.
What you should know is that Trouble has just passed S&T
maybe Scream and Shout will pass it next
ch... so now that you are in Neogaf we can no longer kick you from plug.dj
Where is the lie?
I don't trust popgaf to be able to have a thorough and meaningful discussion about feminism, womanism, intersectionality, the recognition of female agency, and sexuality as it pertains to the ownership of the self, Koodo.
Do you?
but i appreciate that some here understand that feminism doesn't necessarily have to come fully clothed
WaiT.
I'm SCREAMING at Queefer's random arrival.
gagging too. xoxo
But how many songs do you use off of 4?
I think generalizing all criticism of Beyonce as simple bitching about her posing nude is taking the easy way out. Especially in the context of who gets stanned regularly here in PopGAF. I in particular would be a hypocrite, since I believe that Xtina of all people has been a positive feminist figure and she's spent the bulk of her career butt-ass-naked.
Also, if the article from The Guardian is guilty of assuming the worst, this piece is guilty of only assuming the best intent on Beyonce's part. Hell, they're practically stanning at several points in the discussion. Well, she's Beyonce and thus awesome so why didn't the author of that article consider that she bla bla bla whatever."
I read it this morning. It is an opposing view, no more valid than the piece it's criticizing. I have nothing else to say about it.
Hypocrisy is the watch-word of stanning.
I think we can separate their characterization of The Guardian article (accurate) with their speculations on Beyoncé's awesomeness (speculative stanning), sure. But it is not "no more valid"; the article arguing that she's hurting feminism by being seen in her underwear is hurting feminism is baseless.
They were right in their criticisms of Freeman's article, though.
now WAIT
.Mumei said:Hypocrisy is the watch-word
She is imitating Michael in more ways than one.
So I enter to see botty talking BS AGAIN!!
SCREAAAAAAAMINNNNNNGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG!!!!!
When did Queefer APPLY for a damn ACCOUNT?
Months ago. He has been perched on the waiting list, waiting for the day he could argue with me on here.
But why would anyone want to argue with you? You are all that is perfection and flawlessness. Zenith of PURITY.
I disagree that the article slamming Bey was baseless, though. Though, I see two different issues being argued here. Feministing seems to be focusing on Bey having the right of agency and controlling her image and doing whatever the fuck she wants. This is true.
I think Freeman's position was more examining the perception of Beyonce's choices. Beyonce has the right to do whatever she wants, but the apparently hypocrisy in bitching about men defining sexy while appearing perfectly photoshopped, lightened, tucked and borderline nude on the cover of a men's magazine is something that I don't find necessarily wrong to criticize. It's like when parents lecture their children on the dangers of smoking while taking long drags of a cigarette.
I also cackle at people defending Beyonce from "slut shaming" when Beyonce herself has done her fair share of slut shaming throughout her career. I guess when it's her turn to wear a pair of daisy dukes and toot that ass for men we're supposed to look the other way. A hypocrite and a disgrace.
OMG, Waffles is making a comeback? Hell to the yes!waits for Waffles to tell me I'm wrong
what is that...
OMG, Waffles is making a comeback? Hell to the yes!
Yes, keep getting scruffier.