Schrödinger's cat
Banned
If it bleeds we can kill it.
Dan Trachtenberg Set To Direct ‘Skulls’ For Fox/Disney (EXCLUSIVE)
We have learned that Dan Trachtenberg is set to direct ‘Skulls’ for Fox/Disney.discussingfilm.net
Exactly my point, the website isn't quoting anyone, no mention if they even talked to anyone at the studio. Discussingfilm is choosing to use those words.
Meh, nearly everyone is reporting on that, from what I can tell based on that DF story. Might be fake, might be an unsourced leak, but it doesn't sound all that outlandish for a current year project. Do you not believe it? I will not be surprised at all if this is what they end up doing.
DiscussingFilm is basically the only site that reported on Skulls last year, maybe 1 or 2 other sites but they quoted Discussingfilm.
The main sites, Collider, Deadline, Variety and Hollywood Reporter are not reporting on this click bait wordery.
When the marketing team kicks in and they use the words "gender norms", then get triggered. For now, itsa no name website choosing to use those words. Have you even heard of Discussingfilm before today?
lol I don't know why you think people are on the edge of their seats screaming about this, it's a plausible sounding narrative direction and people are responding to that. If it's fake it's fake, NBD.
Except that they won't, because they aren't that stupid.DiscussingFilm is basically the only site that reported on Skulls last year, maybe 1 or 2 other sites but they quoted Discussingfilm.
The main sites, Collider, Deadline, Variety and Hollywood Reporter are not reporting on this click bait wordery.
When the marketing team kicks in and they use the words "gender norms", then get triggered. For now, itsa no name website choosing to use those words. Have you even heard of Discussingfilm before today?
Except that they won't, because they aren't that stupid.
But what the marketing team tries has nothing to do with what's in the script, so can you cut the bullshit already?
the only two good films in this franchise were the original and PredatorS
"Predator 5 will be set in the past (finally!) where it will focus around Native Americans before the territories were taken by the American settlers, featuring a First Nations cast."
More like an ancestor by the sounds of it.
Your attempt to defend this movie, as if the marketing mentioning ”gender norms” means anything to the actual script.What bullshit, what are you on aboot?
It has to be better than the last Predator movie.
Probably the worst movie I've seen in the past 5-6 years. Didn't think it was gonna be good, but didn't expect it to be THAT bad. Even the actors look and sound like they're just part of one big joke.
Can't be any worse than the previous movie.
Only good Pred movie I've seen is #1. Even with it's low budget plasma cannon effects.
The Alien vs Pred fights in AVP were cool to see (rest of movie was trash).
#2 was meh. When the Predator gets intertwined with urban cities, it' loses it's flair. Although the part he flips through his infrared modes in the meat locker was cool.
That one Pred movie that seemed like it was shot in semi-darkness the entire time was crap.
I didn't see all of them. So maybe the ones I missed are good.
Can you imagine if they made a sci-if film with a strong female lead and a racially diverse cast. Not only that they made a sequel dealing with issues such as motherhood with another racially diverse cast with a few strong female leads.
plus it took a stab a cooperate greed and how man is inhumain to fellow man.
But then they lose sight of what made the the first two films excellent so tried to make two sequels one admittedly not so bad but plagued by production problems. Then they decided to make some prequels and started extending the universe of the film but make it rated for a wider audience.
what kind of madness would that be ?
can you imagine ?!?,
Bad taste!
I think I love you.You know, I'm sensing a certain sardonic edge to your post.
I grew up with the Alien films as well as the first 2 Terminators. My friends and I all worshipped those movies at the time. As an adult I looked back at them and appreciated the fact that they included strong female characters which most films of the time didn't. This seemed pretty cool and I liked the fact that they were challenging norms and making something that was original.
However, what separates those movies from the stuff we get today is that they were great films that happened to have women in them. Of course their gender was central to both franchises but we weren't being preached at or attacked. By all means have strong female characters in films but when studios do this as a way of attacking men it just comes across as bitter and resentful. Why would I want to watch that?
So many of these female led actions movies contain constant digs at men, endlessly saying how stupid and pathetic we are. Can you imagine how bad the first Alien film would be if every 5 minutes Ripley turned to the camera and said something like "women are the best and boys are stupid, yeah!". It would totally ruin the film.
You can sense it in the press releases that they are making these films for political purposes as much as anything. It's all part of trying to smash the patriarchy. I think they even said that the last Terminator film was going to upset a lot of men and that was a good thing. And then they wonder why the films bomb at the box office.
Your attempt to defend this movie, as if the marketing mentioning ”gender norms” means anything to the actual script.
look I like movies that are awesome you know movies where predators blow people the pieces and s***. some might want to tell me that birdman was a great movie but you know something no one blows anyone to pieces in that film so what the hell do I care.You'd be the expert on that subject matter if you liked the previous movie.
look I like movies that are awesome you know movies where predators blow people the pieces and s***. some might want to tell me that birdman was a great movie but you know something no one blows anyone to pieces in that film so what the hell do I care.
I don't know someone would have to explain to me what their problem was with it otherwise I don't get it. I mean is it as good as the others no I would never say that but there's only so many movies a year where some alien monster rips people to pieces and I'm going to enjoy the ones that I get.Birdman was tedium personified but that doesn't change the fact that the last Predator movie was was dreck.
It has to be better than the last Predator movie.
Probably the worst movie I've seen in the past 5-6 years. Didn't think it was gonna be good, but didn't expect it to be THAT bad. Even the actors look and sound like they're just part of one big joke.
You guys are so weird like the story was ever the strongest part.Jesus Christ this movie was disappointing. I remember the lead up to it seeing Shane Black involved and thinking it'd be the best Predator film since the original...then there were story leaks that sounded so incredibly fucking stupid I didn't believe them....then I saw the movie....what a cobbled together poorly thought out dumb shit waste of a budget. The AVP films are masterpieces compared to this horrendous pile of thoughtless fermenting animal shit.
titled sexual predatorsShould've made it about a male feminist.
It's crappy worded and probably aims to draw the woke audience aswell but in that setting the conflict of turning into a warrior woman definitely is a major plot point. In addition you can predict a largely 'realistic' world and not some fantasy with Amazon-type warrior women.Your attempt to defend this movie, as if the marketing mentioning ”gender norms” means anything to the actual script.
Speaking only for myself, I'd have reacted by pointing out that strawman fallacies are a very poor foundation for a counterpoint.I wonder how people here would have reacted to the announcement of Mad Max Fury Road.
"Hey guys, you know what ? The next Mad Max will focus on a badass woman who rebels against patriarchy by smuggling oppressed women in her truck. Max spends most of the time gagged and bound, he's not even driving the car. Actually his car isn't even in the film."
Shitty movie, right ?
Speaking only for myself, I'd have reacted by pointing out that strawman fallacies are a very poor foundation for a counterpoint.
It is a strawman fallacy.That's not a strawman fallacy as the depiction I'm making of the movie is actually legit
Now you're just being dishonest and obtuse to defend your strawman - which was your fabrication of a response to the movie you reference (which we can also regard as whataboutism).It's not a fabricated position, Mad Max Fury Road IS the story of a strong woman smuggling oppressed women from a patriarchal society, it's 100% factual, and not the position I'm pretending to comment.
I wonder how people here would have reacted to..
Now you're just being dishonest and obtuse to defend your strawman - which was your fabrication of a response to the movie you reference (which we can also regard as whataboutism).
Here are your own words, the preamble to your strawman fallacy:
By all means, continue to employ dishonesty, fabrications, whataboutism and obtuseness to make your so-called counterpoint. All it does is make it self-defeating and demonstrate the questionable methods you rely on to distract and derail from the genuine topic of this thread.
Creating a fabrication to argue against the fabrication is the defintion of a strawman and, as I've pointed out clearly to you (despite your efforts to be obtuse) is exactly what you came in this thread to do.Still no strawman.
I thought the last Predator was fun. Wokeness will probably make this new one bad though.