Earlier today in the financial times: There were two real interesting letters to the editor... This would make it seem that Palestinians are as entitled to the land and even more so than the Israelis as they stayed during the various hardships of that land brought. Although various Jewish populations are similar to the Muslim/Christian populations of the land around that area.
Regardless this is very interesting debate to have with anyone.
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/849d17e0-d63e-11de-b80f-00144feabdc0.html?nclick_check=1
Counter-argument:
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/b301f7ea-d63e-11de-b80f-00144feabdc0.html
Regardless this is very interesting debate to have with anyone.
Was remedy for atrocity against Jews unfounded?
Published: November 21 2009 02:00 | Last updated: November 21 2009 02:00
From Mr Paul Justison.
Sir, Having just read The Invention of the Jewish People by Shlomo Sand, I was disappointed by Simon Schamas review (November 14/15). He belittles the books observation that there never was a Jewish exile and that most European Jewry were converts with roots in central Asia and Europe.
Mr Schama posits that this may be taught to schoolchildren, but professional historians know better. But, as Shlomo Sand shows, the myth of exile is enshrined in Israeli icons and has had profound implications. While the author does not ask it, a reasonable question is: Had the United Nations in 1948 been aware that European Jewry were not rooted in Palestine, would it have given them more than half of that now tragic land? Simon Schama believes that "Israel's case is the remedy for atrocity ...
Certainly there was atrocity, but was the remedy gravely unfounded? Mr Sand makes the case with a variety of evidence that the present-day Palestinians are probably the descendants of the Jews who never left. They converted to Christianity and to Islam, but remained tied to the land. Mr Schama ignores this point.
It is all too common for Jews and Gentiles to suspend their morality when they see Israeli actions towards the Palestinians.
It would be far harder to suspend that morality, if all realised, there was no exile and that those pesky Palestinians are the remains of the original Jewish inhabitants. Such a realisation could spur momentum for a just resolution.
Paul Justison,
Oakland, CA, US
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/849d17e0-d63e-11de-b80f-00144feabdc0.html?nclick_check=1
Counter-argument:
Scientific evidence backs idea that Jews are one people
Published: November 21 2009 02:00 | Last updated: November 21 2009 02:00
From Dr Jacob Amir.
Sir, In his review of Shlomo Sands book, The Invention of the Jewish People , Simon Schama ignores the genetic research which clearly shows that, even though there is no Jewish DNA, there is definite biological-genetic evidence that the Jews are one people (Twist of history, Life & Arts, November 14/15).
Researchers have found that despite their long-term residence in different countries and isolation from one another, most Jewish populations were not significantly different from one another at the genetic level. Palestinian, Syrian and other non-Jewish Middle Eastern populations were also very close to the Jewish populations. Other research showed that the Jews in different countries were much closer to Jews in other countries than to their non-Jewish neighbours.
The Ashkenazi Jews were not found to be similar to present-day Turkish speakers, contrary to the suggestion that Ashkenazi Jews were descended from the Khazars, a Turkish-Asian empire that converted to Judaism in or about the 8th century CE.
The results support the notion that modern Jews are descendants of the Jews who lived in the Middle East 1,900 years ago. Contrary to Mr Sands assertion, both history and science support the existence of the Jewish people.
Jacob Amir,
Jerusalem, Israel
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/b301f7ea-d63e-11de-b80f-00144feabdc0.html