• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Presidential Debate #2 |Washington University| Grab me right in the Ken Bone

Who won?


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Oh shit CNN is a laugh riot right now. They have Vicki Sciolaro on supporting trump and she's nuts. Starts to defend it by going on about issues and talking about how Clintion is for killing babies due to Roe V Wade. Then the host gets her back on subject and she says he's not running for pope.

Jesus these people. It says a lot when the host hangs her head in her hands due to the oral office comment in regards to Bill.

It was an amazing sight..her with that giant cross around her neck.
 
"The" Hispanics. "The" African Americans. "The" Women.

He's one step away from "The" Negroes.

Shit is so fucked up, every single word from his and his camps mouthes in regards to anything racial is nothing but codewords.
 

benjipwns

Banned
You know who would be spinning in their graves right now? General's Patton and MacArthur, that's who. And probably Honest Abe, for good measure.
.
Donald J. Trump ‏@realDonaldTrump
History lesson: There’s a big difference between Hillary Clinton and Abraham Lincoln. For one, his nickname is Honest Abe. #RattledHillary

CuXxMp1WAAEEFf_.jpg
 

dramatis

Member
They probably both got donations from coal companies.
In March, during a CNN town hall, from Hillary Clinton.
Look, we have serious economic problems in many parts of our country. And Roland is absolutely right. Instead of dividing people the way Donald Trump does, let's reunite around policies that will bring jobs and opportunities to all these underserved poor communities.

So for example, I'm the only candidate which has a policy about how to bring economic opportunity using clean renewable energy as the key into coal country. Because we're going to put a lot of coal miners and coal companies out of business, right?

And we're going to make it clear that we don't want to forget those people. Those people labored in those mines for generations, losing their health, often losing their lives to turn on our lights and power our factories.

Now we've got to move away from coal and all the other fossil fuels, but I don't want to move away from the people who did the best they could to produce the energy that we relied on.

So whether it's coal country or Indian country or poor urban areas, there is a lot of poverty in America. We have gone backwards. We were moving in the right direction. In the '90s, more people were lifted out of poverty than any time in recent history.

Because of the terrible economic policies of the Bush administration, President Obama was left with the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression, and people fell back into poverty because they lost jobs, they lost homes, they lost opportunities, and hope.

So I am passionate about this, which is why I have put forward specific plans about how we incentivize more jobs, more investment in poor communities, and put people to work.
Hillary was criticized for those comments as "killing jobs".

You're welcome to be cynical if you want, but try to do some research.

People can be callous enough to say "There's only 75,000 coal mining jobs left in the US, why bother?" But the whole point is not to leave them behind and take them also through an energy industry transition.
 
How have you not moved to another country yet? Following your logic, since America was founded by slave owners and racists and has continued varying levels of racist policy, it's clearly irredeemable.

Or do you just have irrational hatred for the Clintons?

Well, Bush is gone, and I rarely get an opportunity to hate on Biden. Those guys are probably on the top of my list.
 

effzee

Member
The answer to the Muslim girl and sneak attack them plan are going to get lose in all the insanity.

He literally told the Muslim girl you need to police yourself and sorry islamophobia exists but it is what it is never once even pausing to think he is the reason for it.

This is bizzaro world. At this point I am not even amused I just want it to end.
 
The answer to the Muslim girl and sneak attack them plan are going to get lose in all the insanity.

He literally told the Muslim girl you need to police yourself and sorry islamophobia exists but it is what it is never once even pausing to think he is the reason for it.

This is bizzaro world. At this point I am not even amused I just want it to end.

He basically used slurs to describe that poor woman and other Muslim Americans.

It was despicable.
 
Is there any precedent in US history for a presidential nominee making threats that they'll see their opponent thrown in jail once their elected?

I can sort of imagine this being a thing in the early days of the US, but it seems much more like the sort of thing you see in authoritarian regimes where political opposition is jailed.

I couldn't bring myself to watch more of the debate than the 20 or so minutes that I watched, but that really stuck out to me.
 

mnz

Unconfirmed Member
Finally been watching this from across the pond, but man, some parts made me furious anyway. First of all how much personal shittalking there was and how little policy. And then if they actually turned to it, how they just left any statement unquestioned, no matter how controversial.

Some examples:
Trump:
- 800 billion USD trade deficit and how he will make much better deals than that. What is he even talking about here? These trades come from businesses and households, there is no governmental approval to them. Does he want to introduce trade barriers? The consequences of that would be insane. Devalue the Dollar? Equally ridiculous.
- Iran deal. Could someone please ask what his alternative is? Having Iran be the eternal enemy, forever under embargoes, working on nuclear power and maybe more in secrecy? This deal was genius in my opinion, a complete breakthrough for the west in a complicated situation, giving us great transparency while at the same time getting Iran out of its isolated corner.
- Reduce tax rate from 35% to 15%. How? What are you going to cut? Would have to be tremendous, since you also want to reduce debt.
- He wants to fucking support Assad and let Putin bomb the rebels. No a single question asked about that. He must be the only politician in the US with that opinion, he's not even of the same opinion as his VP!
- Innercities. He wants to improve them, big league. How? Not a single word.
- "Nuclear". He wants to expand American nuclear power. This would have raised so many flags a couple of decades ago. Nada.

Hillary:
- Super weak on healthcare, didn't actually answer the question.
- No-fly zone over Syria. Maybe ask what's going to happen to Russian jets then? Because those are the ones she would have to shoot down. Crazy idea at this point.
- Arming Kurds. NATO ally Turkey is actively fighting Kurds and even pushed them out of territory they conquered from ISIS. Would she mess with Erdogan here?
- Kind of weak on refugees. Canada is taking more than the US, but the US is actively fighting there. Not to mention how egregious the vetting process already is.
- Coal? You want to get back into coal??

And since they're talking about Russia and Putin so much, I would also love for someone to ask what would happen in a NATO article 5 scenario in the Baltics for example. Especially after Trump's comments regarding military budgets of member nations.
 

fantomena

Member
I and a few friends talk about the "pussy grab" comments and found it really weird that out of all the insane comments Trump has made THIS is what a lot of people seem to explode over.
 
I and a few friends talk about the "pussy grab" comments and found it really weird that out of all the insane comments Trump has made THIS is what a lot of people seem to explode over.

Because a) it's an actual admission of illegal activity. He is privately admitting to sexually assaulting women.

B) other things trump has said can be hand waived away by supporters as his "telling it like it is" bullshit, I.e. he could just be beating his chest and telling people what they want to hear. In this situation, this is what trump is like in private when he doesn't know he's being recorded. It's irrefutable.

C) the people he attacked and offended weren't thought of as necessary to political victory. They may be wrong but some GOP faithfuls seemed to be okay with him attacking minorities. But they absolutely need the women vote and this was trump directly attacking women. The people who are only now disavowing trump are the ones who are trying to save their house or Senate seats. They don't want their female supporters thinking theyre ok with what trump said.
 

Red

Member
I and a few friends talk about the "pussy grab" comments and found it really weird that out of all the insane comments Trump has made THIS is what a lot of people seem to explode over.
It's more explicit than past comments. He says exactly what he thinks he can get away with, and uses derogatory terms for women. He may have been bigoted and chauvinistic in the past, but much of the language used was cushioned in a way that gave him just enough wiggle room to deny prejudice and bias. Now he's got to deal with "I moved on her like a bitch," and "they let you do anything, grab them by the pussy." There's not much room to spin that.
 

Eidan

Member
Eh, US Government came out directly accusing Russia of this.

The intelligence community had been openly voicing their suspicion that Russia was behind the hacks, and attempting to influence the election, but only officially did so days ago.

The link I provided earlier shows that not only was Trump given the heads up before it was officially announced, but he was given the heads up before he went on an embarrassing tirade about 400 lb hackers.
 

Blackthorn

"hello?" "this is vagina"
The answer to the Muslim girl and sneak attack them plan are going to get lose in all the insanity.

He literally told the Muslim girl you need to police yourself and sorry islamophobia exists but it is what it is never once even pausing to think he is the reason for it.

This is bizzaro world. At this point I am not even amused I just want it to end.
It does show how normalised Islamophobia is and how undervalued Muslim Americans are that he gave such an offensive response and I've not seen it discussed in any media since.

But hey, shrug, guess it was a draw between the incoherent actual fascist and a competent, eloquent, qualified woman.
 
Ok. Here is the insanity in it's full glory. Pardon quality. Was recording on iphone and not really making it a point to get a perfect shot. Also ignore dog licking paws in background. lol

Vicki Sciolaro CNN segment
Woman in the middle with the most hilarious reaction expressions I've seen this election. Doesn't say a word, but her face says it all. Man on the left just in disbelief too. His reaction to "he's not running for pope" was gold.
 

Exile20

Member
Ok. Here is the insanity in it's full glory. Pardon quality. Was recording on iphone and not really making it a point to get a perfect shot. Also ignore dog licking paws in background. lol

Vicki Sciolaro CNN segment

Why is Bill Clinton brought up so much?

If it was known what Bill was accused of before then he would have never became president. Never in a million years.

The situation is very different between the two.
 

Fox Mulder

Member
Moderators receive the biggest L from last nights debate. Why mics aren't cut after the time is up is beyond me. Cooper and Co. either lost all control or tried to helicopter moderate when they felt entitled to.

Also, I can't view this as a draw or anything that gives Trump a sliver of credence for the outcome of the debate. He spewed hot air, lies, and misdirects without touching many of the questions or, when he did, his responses were vague and littered with his typical adjectives like best, wonderful, etc.

In the end, this election just sucks

They can't cut mics. They can't really do much if the candidates don't want to follow the guidelines. Theyd shut up of they were docked electoral votes it something.

The election sucks, but really sets the stage for a better politician to come along next time and do what Trump is doing more skillfully.
 

Xe4

Banned
Behold, the Both Sides Brigade of GAF!

Yesterday many of us were amazed that so many people could watch this event and conclude Trump won or that it was even a draw given that one candidate gave substantive answers and addressed, in detail, policy positions and the questions posed to her by the town hall undecideds while her opponent literally rambled incoherently throughout the night, if less so than in the last debate. These posts are a reminder that regardless of how Clinton exhibits her experience and her willingness to tackle topics that require nuance and a depth of knowledge there will always be people who caricaturize her and her stances.

These are people who, I suspect, don't really care about the issues. And if I am to be honest, I also suspect many of these people aren't really on the fence, but embarrassed right wingers who have internally acknowledged the defense of Trump is a lost cause on GAF and have segued onto the safer and more disingenuous tactic of bringing HRC down to his level.

Example:



Here is what Clinton actually said:



If you can watch this and then run to GAF with a summary that is simply "I want things", it is clear that marriage equality, Roe v Wade, Citizens United and filling the vacancy are not issues that are of concern to you. In the first post I quoted, Kor said HRC's responses were just "nonsense that no one really gives a shit about." But these "things" matter a great deal to a great many people and the BSers are giving themselves away by how easily they dismiss such issues.

Honestly at this point I've given up being alarmed or frustrated by both sides crap. It's a position held at this stage of the election almost exclusively by the willfully ignorant or the cowardly who'd rather not publicize their support for Donald Trump.

Quoted for fucking truth. Hillary isn't perfect, but the "both sides are the same" folks are so damn annoying. You can do example after example, show them why both sides aren't the same, and they'll either ignore you, or plug their ears and continue to insist there's no difference between a woman who dedicated her life to poltics and a man who is racist, sexist, bigoted, and wholly unqualified for the presidency.
 

Ithil

Member
They can't cut mics. They can't really do much if the candidates don't want to follow the guidelines. Theyd shut up of they were docked electoral votes it something.

The election sucks, but really sets the stage for a better politician to come along next time and do what Trump is doing more skillfully.

But that politician would not have the longtime celebrity and following of Trump, it wouldn't be the same.
 

Valonquar

Member
Since a few mentioned a perceived bias towards trump in my TL;DR debate notes: I am 42, and have voted Democrat in every election up to this one. I do hate both candidates but there is no way I will vote for Hillary. Even taking that into account, most of my choices in summaries were for humor more than anything, and I will likely vote either 3rd party, write in, or abstain entirely.

That one answer where Trump was like "We need more nukes than Russia" felt so out of place I laughed out loud at how insane it was. The next 4 to 8 years are going to be dark times...
 
Behold, the Both Sides Brigade of GAF!

Yesterday many of us were amazed that so many people could watch this event and conclude Trump won or that it was even a draw given that one candidate gave substantive answers and addressed, in detail, policy positions and the questions posed to her by the town hall undecideds while her opponent literally rambled incoherently throughout the night, if less so than in the last debate. These posts are a reminder that regardless of how Clinton exhibits her experience and her willingness to tackle topics that require nuance and a depth of knowledge there will always be people who caricaturize her and her stances.

These are people who, I suspect, don't really care about the issues. And if I am to be honest, I also suspect many of these people aren't really on the fence, but embarrassed right wingers who have internally acknowledged the defense of Trump is a lost cause on GAF and have segued onto the safer and more disingenuous tactic of bringing HRC down to his level.

Example:



Here is what Clinton actually said:



If you can watch this and then run to GAF with a summary that is simply "I want things", it is clear that marriage equality, Roe v Wade, Citizens United and filling the vacancy are not issues that are of concern to you. In the first post I quoted, Kor said HRC's responses were just "nonsense that no one really gives a shit about." But these "things" matter a great deal to a great many people and the BSers are giving themselves away by how easily they dismiss such issues.

Honestly at this point I've given up being alarmed or frustrated by both sides crap. It's a position held at this stage of the election almost exclusively by the willfully ignorant or the cowardly who'd rather not publicize their support for Donald Trump.

KOLAN.gif
 
I hadn't considered the possibility of proof coming out that Trump paid for girlfriends' abortions. It wouldn't change a thing, but it would open a new event in the Mental Gymnastics.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom