• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Presidential Debate #3 |University of Nevada| America's Final Fantasy

Status
Not open for further replies.

BatDan

Bane? Get them on board, I'll call it in.
Oh my god....

I still have no idea how someone can look at Trump and think "strong leader that will make us prosperous". I see unhinged maniac that can't cope with anything that isn't kissing his ass.
 

undrtakr900

Member
Fuck you trump, it's that goddam propoganda that blacks are sooo fucking dangerous, is what leads to implicit biad that all blacks are criminals.
 
I give Wallace a B+. First half questions weren't good. Second half went pretty well. Solid moderation and he gets a star sticker for keeping the audience quiet.
 

MIMIC

Banned
No contest, Hillary won this debate. I'd say the margin was 70-30. Most of Hillary's statements were policy driven, reinforcing the fact that she basically knows what she's talking about and -- for all intents and purposes -- can be trusted to not run the country into the ground. She took up most of the talking time, but it wasn't just about attacking Trump. She made the argument for why SHE would be the best person on the job, though intellect and temperament, policy and substance.

Most of the topics set up key opportunities to attack Trump though....especially the fitness question. It was a no-brainer who would give the best answer, and Hillary did just that: she gave the best answer: all you had to do was go over the last few days/weeks/months in which Trump became a national embarrassment. And she prosecuted him, not in a mocking tone, but in a tone of warning and caution, which is a lot more persuasive. The rigging portion really nailed him.

In a word, she was Presidential. Trump was a lot more restrained and disciplined this time, but I'd say that this debate was a lot more on substance than mudslinging, and that never benefits Trump.

EDIT: If I were to grade them:

Clinton: A-. She communicated directly to the people about her plans and goals, and did a tremendous job making the case against her opponent.

Trump: C-. He was less unhinged, but clearly didn't come prepared for certain topics, as shown by his transparent pivots to completely unrelated topics. Hillary did it, too...but she at least TRIED to tie two unrelated topics together. Her pivot was a transition; his was just a messy rush to spit out an answer.

Wallace: B+. I felt that he was a little tougher on Clinton, but he managed to inject some levity into the debate to diffuse some of the more tense moments. I thought that was a good tactic.
 

captive

Joe Six-Pack: posting for the common man
I'm not political strategist but I don't think it's a very good strategy to say with my opponent you get four more years of the current president, when the current president is going to leave office with the high approval rating of any president in the last however many years.
 

DietRob

i've been begging for over 5 years.
a5aEHFv.jpg

Patton Oswald has been a real treat through these debates.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom