VictimOfGrief
Banned
30 FPS + Effects + Launch Day Game > 60 FPS + Effects - Launch Day game.
What a strange post.Mobius_1 said:
Don't even joke about that stuff. We don't want to encourage anymore developers to stick with 30.30 FPS + Effects + Launch Day Game > 60 FPS + Effects - Launch Day game.
dark10x said:What a strange post...
Actually, PGR3 looks nowhere near as good (for a number of reasons). It's not a fair comparison, though, as PGR3 is actually real game and that CG demo was nothing more than CG.Mobius_1 said:It's the truth! Motorstorm was all CG and PGR 3 looks better and is real time![]()
And here we go...Mobius_1 said:It's the truth! Motorstorm was all CG and PGR 3 looks better and is real time![]()
Are you kidding me? With a game looking so silky smooth as that... even in shitty video form, I can't image it looking or feeling "better" than what we've seen.dark10x said:What a strange post.
Don't even joke about that stuff. We don't want to encourage anymore developers to stick with 30.
First of all "the silking smooth" feeling is partially the result of recording with a camera. Don't forget that.VictimOfGrief said:Are you kidding me? With a game looking so silky smooth as that... even in shitty video form, I can't image it looking or feeling "better" than what we've seen.
You have to remember, not trying to play damage control for Bizzare at all, but this is the tip of the ice burg. I'm sure that PGR 4 once it hits will be 60 FPS and more detailed than this. It's the learning curve with any new system.
What the hell? That's just plain nasty. What is it with you actually attacking people?Teknopathetic said:This game looks so good, it deserves to be in a thread without dark10x's shitty snobbery.
Mobius_1 said:![]()
psyborg alert
btw does PGR 3 have damage modeling or not?
'Cept for the fact that, delay withstanding, all things wouldn't be equal since in the other thread you guys would "prefer" a lot of features to be cut just to make 60.dark10x said:First of all "the silking smooth" feeling is partially the result of recording with a camera. Don't forget that.
However, to suggest that, with all things equal, 30 fps would be superior to 60 fps is just insanity.
dark10x said:Discussion > random "WOW" comments
MbGCaM said:Yes, it has. Confirmed in TGS.
VictimOfGrief said:Either turn up your brightness on your monitor or buy new eyes on ebay.
I'd love to continue to argue with you about this, but apparently, that's considered being a snobby bastard. Fine.raYne said:'Cept for the fact that, delay withstanding, all things wouldn't be equal since in the other thread you guys would "prefer" a lot of features to be cut just to make 60.
As for the "feeling" the dev interviews already said the 30 vs 60 "feeling" would be negligible due to the motion blur etc.
Dark - What i'm trying to say is.... Half of GaF understands 60 FPS. Half of GaF knows what 60 FPS is.... there's a difference.dark10x said:First of all "the silking smooth" feeling is partially the result of recording with a camera. Don't forget that.
However, to suggest that, with all things equal, 30 fps would be superior to 60 fps is just insanity.
VictimOfGrief said:Are you kidding me? With a game looking so silky smooth as that... even in shitty video form, I can't image it looking or feeling "better" than what we've seen.
Sorry you wasted your time typing that. Discussion over. It's "snobbish" to even CONSIDER discussing this stuff.VictimOfGrief said:Dark - What i'm trying to say is.... Half of GaF understands 60 FPS. Half of GaF knows what 60 FPS is.... there's a difference.
...
Coming in and out of this thread saying that people who think 30 FPS + effects > 60 FPS w/ effects are insane, while true to a point, we just like playing the games.![]()
You have the perfect avatar.demon said:That looked really good, but honestly, I think that's mostly because of the way the cockpit view was done, which doesn't really seem like something that couldn't be done in a current-gen racer. Beyond that, the video was too grainy to make out the level of detail and whatnot. The lighting sure seemed nice, though.
dark10x said:Discussion > random "WOW" comments
VictimOfGrief said:Dark - What i'm trying to say is.... Half of GaF understands 60 FPS. Half of GaF knows what 60 FPS is.... there's a difference.
To the mass market.... you're gong to get the "Wow.... holy shit man!!" type of reaction from MS target age of 17-30 year old guys. It's not hard to say that "Fuck this game, it's not 60 FPS, I'm pissed... and goign to listen to Linkin Park because the Xbox 360 can't perform." :lol
What's Rendezvous?Matlock said:That's just another step closer to Rendezvous.![]()
Fuck. There's always one turd in the punch bowl. Run along, now.Mobius_1 said:It's the truth! Motorstorm was all CG and PGR 3 looks better and is real time![]()
No. and I know your a FPS snob to Gek.Gek54 said:So you are putting yourself into the retarded half?
Indeed, it's the fifth dentist syndrome...bishoptl said:Fuck. There's always one turd in the punch bowl. Run along, now.
The hell? You really want to get some more PMs don't you?And as for the video itself...didn't I tell you that X360 was a powerful piece of kit? Didn't I? That looks (and sounds) farkin' incredible. Can't wait to see some better video...![]()
Yes, I did. 30 fps bothered me a lot, but it was still fun. I preferred PGR1, though.FiRez said:Maybe Dark10x never played PGR2, it was easily one of the best racing games of this gen and it run at 30fps.
Making kudos never gets old![]()
:loldark10x said:Yes, I did. 30 fps bothered me a lot, but it was still fun. I preferred PGR1, though.
Lunar Aura said:if anyone says anything about 360s power after viewing that vid the terrorist have won.
What do you want me to do? Lie?VictimOfGrief said::lol