I like it, lets go with this.
I don't even understand why he is even in PS5 threads? He just adds negative comments about PS5 and how much better his precious is.
I don't know if you all have been asleep? I called out MonarchJT on this Fud way back earlier when he was saying PS5 is RDNA1.5. I asked him then what AMD spec is RDNA1. 5.
Actually, cache scrubbers looked from Cerny's tsk about a feature that might not be picked up for the desktop cards (possibly there are other cheaper ways to sort this problem for Big Navi and other cards with outrageous bandwidth).
at your GE comment...
It may be in the next series of RDNA cards. I think that was his point when he said stuff in the PS5 may come to RDNA3 if it works well.
Just to continue that, it may require a shift in PC design to implement of course. Not sure about that.
... Sure, Jan?
listen again he specifficaly used cache scrubber as an example of something too specific to their customization to come ...
Aye, as I say after I think that might be a feature that would require a shift in PC architecture design.
That basically supports the tweet quite well.
He's back again trying to spread fud. Never learns
reported. You can also not accept the reality but not accuse others of talking nonsense when you are the problem
So can you provide the specification for RDNA1.5???so basically like the ps5 soft engineer said and that all sony fanboys didn't accept? ...if we had a bet i would have won and also mods after they soft/banned/silenced me from that thread and not someone else .. should revisit the decision
info we have is rdna3 will be a refresh focusing on perf/watt
Yup, the whole version numbering thing is a mess and kind of useless (and it seems some did not catch that my post trying to give "exact" numbers to the PS5's GPU was a joke).
The charts and tables with precise features are pretty useful to help us get a proper picture, the one with actual performance numbers is even more important as it tells us comparable graphics task performance on each machines (but we have to keep in mind that each frame is a mix of all of them + game logic and other things, which is why the machines trade blows in most situations).
RDNA 2.0 Feature Ray tracing VRS Mesh Shaders Machine Learning Performance Per Watt Infinity Cache Playstation 5 Yes No No No Yes No Xbox Series X Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes but using RDNA 1.0 clocks No
Using this metric, I would say the PS5 is RDNA 1.33 and XSX is RDNA 1.66
The XSX might take the lead once devs start utilizing mesh shaders and VRS, but the PS5 is probably doing better at the moment because it's hitting those higher RDNA 2.0 clocks where as MS used those perf per watt gains to get more CUs on the GPU.
Both are lacking Infinity Cache which is the secret sauce and the key to the 6800xt keeping pace with the 3080.
Then there is this: The PS5 higher clocks give it several advantages over the xsx which is probably why we have seen it perform better or the same in several games in the cross gen period.
Interesting, maybe some people assume that ML support is in the "old" version then who knows. None of it seems like what the RTX cards have, but I never looked into the details of what's needed to do ML well.If that RDNA 1.1 is true then ML is the same.
The C64 had DMA access features as well, apparently people use it to stream video from carts these days.
AMD probably changed the comercial/marketing name just like GCN.
He only accepts receipts for certain quotes that help and strengthen his agenda. All other quotes by said engineer are fake news.
If anyone needs reporting it's you.
Ok, so either you go with the info that was been posted about the PS5 die shot from the same set of tweets or you dont.
If you take clock and perf/clock as evidence... not.
Now the backtracking will start.......
No the clock it would not seem so obvious the Xbox still goes at 1800 + Ghz as a game clock of a rdna2 6800 no ?. nothing said at hotchip being rdna2 if you remember ?
I was right in the other thread and I'm right now about the ps5 gpu theres nothing to backtrack . the smartest thing we could do instead of giving names would be trying to understand features . but also there sony is secretive
I think you would personally find them very constructive if you would read them at full length, together with the context because nearly all of them are stated in a neutral and objective matter.
Now we get into a situation I was gonna post the other day to answer that person with but decided to delete it. Might as well now...
More like PS5 clocks... unless you are using some underclocked RX 6800 as example.
More like PS5 clocks... unless you are using some underclocked RX 6800 as example.
In their test it never go lower than 1974Mhz.
AMD Radeon RX 6800 Review
The Radeon RX 6800 is the world's most power-efficient graphics card, better than anything NVIDIA Ampere has to offer. The smaller brother to the RX 6800 XT comes with a smaller heatsink, at more affordable pricing, but retains the lavish 16 GB VRAM memory buffer.www.techpowerup.com
More like PS5 clocks... unless you are using some underclocked RX 6800 as example.
In their test it never go lower than 1974Mhz.
AMD Radeon RX 6800 Review
The Radeon RX 6800 is the world's most power-efficient graphics card, better than anything NVIDIA Ampere has to offer. The smaller brother to the RX 6800 XT comes with a smaller heatsink, at more affordable pricing, but retains the lavish 16 GB VRAM memory buffer.
