Long enough to know it's not for me.
And that's okay. But there are quite a few people who seem to think that if they don't want to use gyro aiming, then nobody should be able to use it. To me, that's very unfair to the people who do like it. I absolutely agree that it should be optional in most games that impliment it. But it's silly to suggest it shouldn't be included at all just because you don't like it. This isn't directed at you specifically, just the people who say that Motion controls shouldn't be included in any game at all.
Fair enough.
you do know that you mainly use the analog sticks and the gyro aiming is for fine-tuning?
Then what is a good example of this? I tried BotW with this option and hated it.
I'd say Days Gone. There's sadly not many options on PS4.
At least it's coming to PC and we can add it ourselves, shame we have to do that though to get the most out of the DS4, it would be such an easy option to add in a menu.
Days Gone added it, so hopefully, other Sony developers follow suit.
Bend even included it in a Days Gone update. Sony really needs to push its first parties to use its controller features more consistently, especially in places where it makes sense. I get not wanting tacked-on waggle, but Horizon not having Gyro aiming when BotW does is completely inexcusable and should be called out.
Days Gone is so much fun. Probably the most fun I've had out of most of the exclusives on PS4 besides Bloodborne.
No...the sucky uses of it went away. "Motion" controls are alive and well. As someone who regularly uses gyro aim on my PC I can tell you it most certainly does not suck. Wank off the Wiimote this is not.
The difference is that in the PS3 days, Sixaxis was mostly bolted on junk that was poorly implemented in half the games developers used it in. There were some decent uses of it for sure, but the likes of Lair have soured people on it. But now that games like Dreams and Days Gone, and half of the first party Switch lineup showed everyone how to use motion controls in a traditional controller setup, people are clamoring for it.Anyway, it's either all or nothing, PS3 with Sixaxis clearly shown people don't want mixed controls, where some part of the games are played with analogs and some with gyro. ND even patched UCF to let people turn off Sixaxis controlls because people complained so much. It's just too distracting unless a game utilizes gyro all the time, people just get frustrated when they want to use something and it doesn't work, and they need to remind themselves that's the part you have to use motion controls. It has been tested, didn't work.
So all the people playing on the switch and the doom guys adding this are in the wrong? Either way, no one says that they should force it, just give it to me as an option.
It'll likely not come back but gyro seems a decent option so long as it remains optional and isn't used as standard. Only really used it on the Wii U with BOTW myself tho
LOL, is this a joke?last generation aiming schemes like this will be the first to go in the grand holy mission to erase nintendo from the timeline
Only because modern shooters are bloated with aim assist mechanics to disguise how poor sticks are as an aiming input.
There was no excuse for rumble not being standard. Gyro controls is a neat addon but not necessary imo.
If we are talking about performance it's objectively superior to traditional right stick only aim.
