Ev1L AuRoN
Member
Wow, Cool, I use the DS4 on the PC and Nintendo Switch all the time, if the DualSense can use at least some of his features in the PC that will be amazing.
I believe they said it will work with most "good quality" headphones and I'm sure their own current best gaming headphones (platnium is this right?) are classed as good quality. Its to do with frequency response I think. They say in that Sony booklet Bo posted that one of the top recommended headphones for 3D audio are their 1000XM3 headphones, which are €270 just now on amazon.
What are the chances for the PS4 games get a patch to use the Dualsense?
In Death Stranding will be great to feel the diferent surfaces of the ground and the weight of the cargo with the adaptitive trigers.
I am a bit surprised the pulse headsets sold out. I really thought I would have been able to pick one up in store when I pick up the console.
Tell me about it, I was going to pre order but then decided to come on gaf and ask stuff about it. Was too late by the end of it.
Wow, Cool, I use the DS4 on the PC and Nintendo Switch all the time, if the DualSense can use at least some of his features in the PC that will be amazing.
Everything leads me to believe they have absolutely nailed this controller
I actually hated the controller speaker for the entirety of this gen. I'm sure someone came up with a gimmicky use for it, but for me it was just a mostly invisible piece of hardware that occasionally made me go "did you hear that? Where is that...oh. Can I turn that off? Nice"
I’ll try the platinum tomorrow against the pulses. I’ll let you know. This guy compares but it’s not the most technical review. I get that these aren’t audiophile grade headsets but he’s comparing the platinum without the 3d update so the source isn’t the same and the difference hes hearing is probably from the processing. UNLESS 3D pulse has extra or better tech @$99Yeah they fold.
I’ll try the platinum tomorrow against the pulses. I’ll let you know. This guy compares but it’s not the most technical review. I get that these aren’t audiophile grade headsets but he’s comparing the platinum without the 3d update so the source isn’t the same and the difference hes hearing is probably from the processing. UNLESS 3D pulse has extra or better tech @$99
Do you have a ps5 to try the 3d headset? i'm mostly interested about the performance on console, i barely use headphones to watch films or to listen music, i'm not really an audiophile.
Both of us will have PS5 and Pulse 3D. He's more educated and experienced though.
So you do actually work for sony
So let get this straight, tomorrow you are gonna have a ps5 available?!
For real though, how XSX controller not even have a gyroscope?????? In this day and age, it's sad.This is the ONLY next gen controller.
no.. unless it's a ps4 game your playing on ps5.Ok but can i use the my dual shock 4 for 2nd player?
iPhone phones from 7 onwards already do something like that. Its called Taptic Engine and its awesome. Every sound has a kind of vibration that its like “feeling” the sound
As I remember, in Playstation ecosystem, the old controllers never able to work on newer gen. I don't know why you're expecting it will be now..Ok but can i use the my dual shock 4 for 2nd player?
This begs the question now, how can other companies justify the cost of their controllers now? DualSense is packed full of tech, for $70. Switch Pro controller seems like a scam at this point, no?
For real though, how XSX controller not even have a gyroscope?????? In this day and age, it's sad.
Ok but can i use the my dual shock 4 for 2nd player?
iPhone phones from 7 onwards already do something like that. Its called Taptic Engine and its awesome. Every sound has a kind of vibration that its like “feeling” the sound
As I remember, in Playstation ecosystem, the old controllers never able to work on newer gen. I don't know why you're expecting it will be now..
I dont want to spend £60 on a 2nd controller.No gyro, no touch pad, no battery. But some people love basic stuff.
Only PS4 games, and why the downgrade? Also we want devs to have full support of DS and not be bothered by DS4 dragging it back.
Yes, but very, very tiny in comparison.
Yup, I would argue that I would rather not have BC at all and go full speed into full potential instead of wasting time on old tech. But some people like playing old games, not sure why.
I dont want to spend £60 on a 2nd controller.
Also ds4 has same number of buttons
Na im talking two player. Fifa etcDon't need to, you can use the wire included or plug a cheap 2.0 USD extender and use it while charging after 10-20 hours of continues playing to play another 10-20 hours.
Na im talking two player. Fifa etc
He’s saying he doesn’t want to spend £60 on a second DS5 when he has perfectly fine DS4s that will do the same thing.Never been a problem on PS4, why should it be now? One will charge or you can both charge as well.
He’s saying he doesn’t want to spend £60 on a second DS5 when he has perfectly fine DS4s that will do the same thing.
I've argued it before, and I'll gladly do it again. The decision from Sony to block the DS4 controller in newer games is a business decision with one focus - maximizing profits. There's little to no technical reason for it, and I can easily understand why it would annoy someone.
True. So is the decision to offer the same controller with a next gen console. Both have their pros and cons. I personally think the PS4 controller had a lot of room for improvement, so I’m happy to get a new controller this gen.I've argued it before, and I'll gladly do it again. The decision from Sony to block the DS4 controller in newer games is a business decision with one focus - maximizing profits. There's little to no technical reason for it, and I can easily understand why it would annoy someone.
As I remember, in Playstation ecosystem, the old controllers never able to work on newer gen. I don't know why you're expecting it will be now..
True. So is the decision to offer the same controller with a next gen console. Both have their pros and cons.
Don't need to, you can use the wire included or plug a cheap 2.0 USD extender and use it while charging after 10-20 hours of continues playing to play another 10-20 hours.
Don't feed the troll
I've argued it before, and I'll gladly do it again. The decision from Sony to block the DS4 controller in newer games is a business decision with one focus - maximizing profits. There's little to no technical reason for it, and I can easily understand why it would annoy someone.
Of course they can support it if they want to. But for gamers interested in full support of DualSense and the budget 3rd party devs have many might skip doing the extra work to maximize the experience of the new DS, making its features becoming more gimmicky than immersive. They didn't support DS3 on PS4 as well, nor xbox supported 360 controller.
True. So is the decision to offer the same controller with a next gen console. Both have their pros and cons.
Every single PS5 console will have a DualSense controller as the primary controller, so I doubt supporting older controllers would be an issue. Supporting older controllers is a question of pleasing the users who like to couch-game with their buddies, but don't like to spend 70$ for each controller needed.
The DS4 not working on the PS5 is a software limitation grounded in profit maximization. It's not a big deal for me, since I don't have DS4 controllers lying around, so I need to buy new controllers anyways, but for others, I can definitely understand why they'd be annoyed.
Absolutely.
FrankWza
I see where you're heading with the argument, but I don't think it's valid, considering every single PS5 gamer will use the DualSense controller when available. The DS4 would only be used for the occasions, where multiple people are in the same room, but with not enough controllers. That won't ruin the adaption.
Well, most, if not every consumer product is grounded in maximizing profits. But I hear what you’re saying. I just don’t think it applies here. I think it’s about getting as many people on board with the new tech as possible. Do they need to sell more Dualsense? Yeah, of course. It probably cost them a fortune to produce and develop. I think it’s a fair price for some awesome tech. And if they wanted to be assholes about it, all PS4 controllers would be incompatible. It’s really just the DualShock that is. I really believe it’s being done because it makes the experience better, even for couch player 2. That’s the guy who used to get the mad catz controller back in the day.
I honestly think it's about profits. Allowing the DS4 to be used for some games, but not all, on the PS5 is an odd decision. It makes me think that Sony is actively blocking the DS4 controllers in the PS5 games.
The DualSense is a better controller and the experience for player 2 will be better if he uses that, but having a 'mad catz controller' is infinitely better than having no controller, if the host didn't want to buy a brand new DualSense just to play FIFA against his buddy every two weeks.
I’m not saying DualShock is a mad catz experience, I’m just saying that’s a very specific scenario that I don’t think is important enough to warrant Dualsense compatibility. It’s about profits too, it has to be to an extent, but I don’t see it as a corporate greed scenario because I think the features are different enough. I don’t think DS3 worked on DS4 and they are closer in features than DS4 and Dualsense. Nobody cared because DS3 was terrible.
My point is, that it looks like they've actively blocked the compability. It would've been easy for them to present information on the screen to the user using the DS4 that said something like "Note that you're using a legacy controller. Not all features are supported" and let the users decide for themselves.
I think we disagree on the motivations, ultimately.
My point is, that it looks like they've actively blocked the compability. It would've been easy for them to present information on the screen to the user using the DS4 that said something like "Note that you're using a legacy controller. Not all features are supported" and let the users decide for themselves.
I think we disagree on the motivations, ultimately.
I'm not sure how anybody can disagree with you on the motives to be honest. It's clearly to make more money.
I'm not sure how anybody can disagree with you on the motives to be honest. It's clearly to make more money.
I think the profit margins with what's in the new controller are far thinner than a 7+ year old controller now (new sales). It is only a $5-$10 difference in price on average, but much newer tech down to Realtech chips inside. Again, new sales taken into account. It may be partially, but I still feel it is more for support to make it staple, and it seems to be working in that arena.
Yeah I'm sure they didn't think to put a better battery in itGod all I hear is better draining and more points of failure.
I think its more for maximizing impact from the featureset of the new controller. I mean, they likely make more profit per unit on the DS4 and going forwards DualSense is a key differentiator for the PS5. Its not just an ergonomic change, its required to show of the PS5's value proposition.