Oh goody, so we're already into another round of ridiculous downplaying by people with no particular insight? How tiresome. And now it's got to the point where people are quoting Reuters reports they don't understand written by writers who don't understand what they're writing. It's almost tragically comical.
Quick question: do you think that Sony would have admitted they were hacked if they had managed to get the network up within a day? Or would it have been passed off as unscheduled maintenance? Interesting how it took them a couple of days to publicly state that the downtime was a result of a network intrusion.
And on the credit-cards topic; Sony notified financial institutions to keep a close eye on accounts with PSN transactions almost a week before they publicly acknowledged that users were potentially at risk of credit-card fraud.
"Everybody's network is getting hammered all the time." No shit, Sherlock. How come there aren't massive cases of data-theft like this reported every day? Could it be that other major companies have better network security? Oh no that's right. It's because they aren't telling anyone. Riiiiiight. Did we all forget that the absence of evidence is not evidence?
Well while we're gabbing, let's have a look at a report about that survey rather than an article which mentions it out of context:
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2011/0...k-threats-in-critical-industries-report-finds
Christian Science Monitor said:
Industries crucial to the functioning of society such as water treatment systems, power plants, and oil and gas facilities use computer-controlled systems that are under fast-growing cyberattack by hackers, often affiliated with government and organized crime groups, says a new report. These key industries, it adds, often are not boosting security to deal with the threat.
For decades, industrial control systems that operate the power grid and other vital infrastructure enjoyed "security by obscurity." Cybercriminal gangs saw better places to make money. That's changed in a flash.
A drumbeat of reports in recent years has warned of the corporate trend to connect previously isolated vital systems to the Internet, making them more vulnerable to criminal and government hackers seeking to infiltrate infrastructure networks.
Interesting, so the reason that they are being hacked is because they aren't updating their systems. So...
it's their own fault. Looks like that survey is more relevant to this issue than the Reuters dude realised. The point of the findings isn't to absolve companies of responsibility for losing private data, it's to chasten them for being lax with their security.
Anyway, good times.