Linneman (DF) recent tweets really excites me:
https://twitter.com/dark1x/with_replies
John Linneman ‏@dark1x Blown away but what I've played of QB thus far. Amazing work.
John Linneman ‏@dark1x I think it's blown way out of proportion. It's one of the best looking, technically accomplished games on XO.
John Linneman ‏@dark1x It's rather frustrating. I don't think people fully understand the resolution issue (it's not "just" 720p - it's more complex)
John Linneman ‏@dark1x Nope, it's something different entirely. I've never seen anything quite like it. It works pretty well, actually.
cool
saw this on one of the stream
![]()
she's the one from the reveal trailer
It was confirmed that the scene from the reveal trailer is still in the game, if a bit changed.![]()
Last big GIF from me (for now):
![]()
Okay, last thing I watched on the stream, and at all.
Multiple playthroughs here I come. There wille be some interesting discussions, and a huge spoiler thread.One decision straight up killed a character, which else you get to play for quite some time in the game with.
Damn this game looks good, the lighting especially. And this game has style, very compelling look.
Nice. Thank you.5 acts
4 live action episodes.
Okay, I lied. This is gonna be the last GIF, since it finally got uploaded:
![]()
Last big GIF from me (for now):
![]()
If you factor in resolution then clearly Infamous is pushing more but I'm talking about user perception. Quantum Break can tear frames in select circumstances but it is rather uncommon during the game, I've found. In general, you get perfectly paced 33ms frame-times. No skips or stutters, just fluid performance.I was only comparing the IQ between the two, Infamous is an early PS4 game, open world that run over 40FPS most of the time, with a little more work, they could have probably locked it to 30, Infamous isn't the best PS4 looking game but I choose it cause i love how clean it looks compared to the blurry looks of QB, performance wise, isn't Quantum Break having screen tearing, framerate drops with low resolution ? I'm not sure we can call it running better...
You mean awesome accent? Come on, now.We'll be doing a live stream later tonight (10:15 PM CET, in about 2 hours and 30 minutes), if you guys want to see act 1 of the game live while listening to my terrible French accent![]()
Wow there's a disable copyrighted music option
If you factor in resolution then clearly Infamous is pushing more but I'm talking about user perception. Quantum Break can tear frames in select circumstances but it is rather uncommon during the game, I've found. In general, you get perfectly paced 33ms frame-times. No skips or stutters, just fluid performance.
I'd say The Order runs better while Second Son is perceptibly less smooth, if we're drawing comparisons.
You mean awesome accent? Come on, now.
Last big GIF from me (for now):
![]()
In working on a large analysis now. Yes, they do some insane stuff with time manipulation. I cannot imagine how much work it must have taken. That scene at the end of the Gamescom demo? Yeah, they do that stuff fairly often in very different ways. It's very impressive.Any chance you guys will dig into the ridiculous amount of...I'm not even sure what to call them..."special effects", rippling, time stuff....sheer effort put into what I'm seeing in some of these scenes? It looks ridiculous and crazy in an impressive way.
In working on a large analysis now. Yes, they do some insane stuff with time manipulation. I cannot imagine how much work it must have taken. That scene at the end of the Gamescom demo? Yeah, they do that stuff fairly often in very different ways. It's very impressive.
Hype!In working on a large analysis now. Yes, they do some insane stuff with time manipulation. I cannot imagine how much work it must have taken. That scene at the end of the Gamescom demo? Yeah, they do that stuff fairly often in very different ways. It's very impressive.
This confirms my suspected. The IQ is bad...
![]()
Last big GIF from me (for now):
![]()
Hopefully that steers abit the focus off 720p. Its gonna be a shame if the game is technical very good and impressive in many ways. But we are still gonna hear all the time. "But its 720p in 2016 haha" stuff.
Can you guys unload more gifs of cool shit in this game?
The game may not be what people were expecting on the technical side, but I know is that it looks sick.
5 acts
4 live action episodes.
In working on a large analysis now. Yes, they do some insane stuff with time manipulation. I cannot imagine how much work it must have taken. That scene at the end of the Gamescom demo? Yeah, they do that stuff fairly often in very different ways. It's very impressive.
Looks so incredibly good -- I was going to get this game anyway, but now I'm really excited.
Also goes to show you how lame compressed video is at relaying image quality.
Any idea on these "artifacts"? Intended effect or graphical issue?
I noticed that issue at 2-3 occasions. This is at 4:15-4:25 mark (Gamersyde video) when they rotate the camera around the character.
http://abload.de/img/19jsbc.png[IMG][/QUOTE]
Graphical issue, likely to do with the AA solution I believe (not sure). It's apparent throughout both videos.
Image quality is very different from a typical 720p title - it's not that cut and dried. It's significantly cleaner than various 792p Xbox One titles, for instance. Aggressive temporal AA + some sort of reconstruction.Hopefully that steers abit the focus off 720p. Its gonna be a shame if the game is technical very good and impressive in many ways. But we are still gonna hear all the time. "But its 720p in 2016 haha" stuff.
The next RYSE.
Only in graphics.The next RYSE.
I've been playing The Division on Xbox One for 40 hours or so and it doesn't look as good as QB in any aspect.