Of course we'll get the same old "angry grrrr" thumbnail videos from Hardware Unboxed and Gamers Nexus.If AMD is really calling the RDNA 3 60 CU a 7800 "XT" then I really hope the media calls them out for it like they did w/ Nvidia & the two "4080's". Regardless of it's pricing, it's only going to confuse consumers into thinking it's better than a 6800 XT (which is probably their intention). I digress though, it is what it is.
Coincidence?Every time AMD has an opportunity to capitalise on NVidias greed they end up dropping the ball. That’s a fact.
Silicon vs Silicon, we could no longer expect much from Silicon unfortunately.I'm not so sure, 7600 barely beat the 6650 XT and those had the same number of cores.
7600 didn't beat 6650 XT by 20%, so how could 7800 XT beat 6800 XT when 6800 XT has 20% more CU? Just doesn't seem possible to me, but I'd like to be wrong here, as it would suck to see a worse product launch 3 years later...
RDNA3 is dogshit. Don't ever trust AMD's PR machine!anyone remember all the rdna 3 “leaks” hyping up this crap? this gen really dropped the ball.
This was known 1 year ago that Navi32 had max 60CUs, I don't know why you all acting all surprised.6800 XT has 20% more, that's how. This is the first card in the AMD lineup to go backwards on CU count vs. last gen.
AMD naming/branding is meaningless.
Last gen 6800 XT was on par with a 3080.
This gen 7800 XT could lose to the 4070.
Imagine if Nvidia released RTX 4080 and it was the same performance as RTX 3080, they'd get roasted to hell and back...
The 7900 GRE is a bin-tier card they made just for China. It's basically a way to get rid of chips that aren't good enough for a 7900xtJust get a 7900GRE if you really must be on AMD.
I don't think this is necessarily the issue. The issue is the x800 series was always an x1 chip. The 6800xt was the full Navi 21 and the 6800 was a cut-down version. Now the 7800 is full Navi 32.This was known 1 year ago that Navi32 had max 60CUs, I don't know why you all acting all surprised.
Check the link I posted.
I swear Neogaf members has memory lost or something.
The 7900 GRE is a bin-tier card they made just for China. It's basically a way to get rid of chips that aren't good enough for a 7900xt
Refreshes have always been a thing, but you were getting them at much, much lower price than what the original card used to cost. The 9800 was in the 200 range while the 8800 400+ I believe. These days you're paying a similar price (if not more) for the exact same performance from years ago.Saying that though it's always been scummy. When I first got into PC gaming I bought a GeForce 9800 not knowing it was just a refresh if the 8800 from years earlier.
AMD changed up their naming scheme.I've been saying this for a while. AMD is officially as bad as Nvidia, even worse if you count that given the same performance per price you at least get frame generation with an RTX card. They have simply decided that the price is not tied to the chip size anymore but to the performance and they decided that after the goddamn pandemic where they made bank for no reason, the prices will have to stay up.
The 7900 GRE is a bin-tier card they made just for China. It's basically a way to get rid of chips that aren't good enough for a 7900xt
I don't think this is necessarily the issue. The issue is the x800 series was always an x1 chip. The 6800xt was the full Navi 21 and the 6800 was a cut-down version. Now the 7800 is full Navi 32.
AMD changed up their naming scheme.
It ain't that hard to get with the program.
Price doesn't mean anything. The bin-tier is referred to the shittiest chips of N31 that are used to call a card x900, even though it should be AT BEST A x700xt. You can get a 6950xt for that price, and that's been possible for months.For 650 dollars......bin tier?
Okay.
I'm not so sure, 7600 barely beat the 6650 XT and those had the same number of cores.
7600 didn't beat 6650 XT by 20%, so how could 7800 XT beat 6800 XT when 6800 XT has 20% more CU? Just doesn't seem possible to me, but I'd like to be wrong here, as it would suck to see a worse product launch 3 years later...
Price doesn't mean anything. The bin-tier is referred to the shittiest chips of N31 that are used to call a card x900, even though it should be AT BEST A x700xt. You can get a 6950xt for that price, and that's been possible for months.
It's a shiyty card they won't even dare to launch in the rest of the world.
Not looking good. 6800 XT had 20% more CUs. Sad to see AMD give such a GPU the x800 XT name.
This could actually be worse than the predecessor...
Thought we were talking about AMD?That's not accurate AT ALL if you go by die size
Going by die size
4090 => 4090 or arguably 4080ti
4080 => 4070
4070ti => 4060ti
4070 => 4060
4060ti => 4050ti
4060 => 4050
And even though you do get some nice performance uplift from the previous gen with the first 3, it's way less than you'd get had Nvidia kept the same stricture of the 30 series.
Price doesn't mean anything. The bin-tier is referred to the shittiest chips of N31 that are used to call a card x900, even though it should be AT BEST A x700xt. You can get a 6950xt for that price, and that's been possible for months.
It's a shiyty card they won't even dare to launch in the rest of the world.
Its confusing if they change the naming every generation.AMD changed up their naming scheme.
It ain't that hard to get with the program.
Why you both talk like the card is releasing in here? I'd happily get one of those but I'm thinking it's China only isn't it?Its effectively a direct replacement for a 6950XT.
They are the same price, same VRAM and run near at about the same level of performance.
If you cant find a 6950XT the 7900GRE is a perfect card.
Between the 600 and 700 dollars the 6950XT and the 7900GRE are your best bet, the 4070 isnt particularly interesting unless you really need DLSS.
Where is "here"?Why you both talk like the card is releasing in here? I'd happily get one of those but I'm thinking it's China only isn't it?
I meant in the west, as long as I can buy it on Amazon USA out counts to me, thanksWhere is "here"?
I meant in the west, as long as I can buy it on Amazon USA out counts to me, thanks
I meant in the west, as long as I can buy it on Amazon USA out counts to me, thanks
Well, there's no such thing as a bad card, just bad pricing/value proposition. I think all of AMD's offerings are better than Nvidia's this time, but they both suck. The 7900XT seems to be the better value if you can find it at around 750, but even then, still bad pricing compared to the previous gen.Its effectively a direct replacement for a 6950XT.
They are the same price, same VRAM and run near at about the same level of performance.
If you cant find a 6950XT the 7900GRE is a perfect card.
Between the 600 and 700 dollars the 6950XT and the 7900GRE are your best bet, the 4070 isnt particularly interesting unless you really need DLSS.
There's absolutely no way the 7800 will perform like that. Better than 4070?
The 7600 used a last gen node (6nm) this will be current gen (5nm).I'm not so sure, 7600 barely beat the 6650 XT and those had the same number of cores.
7600 didn't beat 6650 XT by 20%, so how could 7800 XT beat 6800 XT when 6800 XT has 20% more CU? Just doesn't seem possible to me, but I'd like to be wrong here, as it would suck to see a worse product launch 3 years later...