RaymondCarver said:
I kind of figured it'd take > $200 or $300 to play Doom3 flawlessly
Understand that the only reason I'm responding to this is that you used the word
flawlessly, as in:
does not have flaws. You didn't say "to run Doom3 good," or "well," or "decent for $200." You mused that there might be a solution in the $300 range in which one could not possibly ask for anything more in the realm of Doom3 performance. just so we have the explicit terms clear.
Now, my machine is a P4 3.4 HT, with 1gb DDR, and a 6800GT. It does not run Doom3
flawlessly. I run at 1024x768, with High Quality seetings, V-Synch on, no AA and no AF.
The processor and vid card
alone, BTW, cost be over $800, just a month and a half ago.
It's good, it's very very good. But dipping below sixty is a rather common occurance in medium to heavy combat and you can sacrifice fifteen frames everytime you turn of your flashlight. The latter stages of the game really hit up the framerate.
Now I reckon if i switched the P4 for a nice Athlon64, it'd run even better, but not
flawlessly. Unless you mistakenly equated flawless performance with a that doesn't dip below 30fps, then you can put the word "flawless" out of your head for another year or more.