DeepEnigma
Gold Member
Oh look, two bitches.
Oh look, two bitches.
Who's the purple haired bitch?Oh look, two bitches.
It's the exact opposite, actually. He's a fine visual director but the moment he's involved with the story, it usually falls apart. See: Sucker Punch, his DC movies, Army of the Dead, etc.For all i've hear about this guy in the last 15 years or so, he's good at writing but not at directing,
He directed some solid movies in the beginning of his career. Dawn of the Dead is one of the best remakes ever made (written by James Gunn btw), and yes Watchmen was a good (but not perfect) adaptation of what was once regarded as an 'unfilmable' comic book. 300 is well regarded as well but I'm not a huge fan of it, personally.why is he's that revered after all these flops? Is it all because of Watchmen being one of the few mature comic hero movies?.
The self-proclaimed: 'the leading film critic of her generation'Who's the purple haired bitch?
Is it....?Rebel Moon – Part One: A Child of Fire Review - IGN
Zack Snyder's stab at a Star War is let down by a derivative patchwork script, mediocre action sequences and a superficial story.www.ign.com
Hard to believe a synder joint is this bad.
The self-proclaimed: 'the leading film critic of her generation'
Login • Instagram
Welcome back to Instagram. Sign in to check out what your friends, family & interests have been capturing & sharing around the world.www.instagram.com
Never forget Zack Snyder stated his ideal Batman film, one he considers actually adult and high quality, would feature batman being ass raped in prison.
Everyone says that about "Batman Begins." "Batman's dark." I'm like, "Okay, no, Batman's cool." He gets to go to a Tibetan monastery and be trained by ninjas. Okay? I want to do that. But he doesn't, like, get raped in prison. That could happen in my movie. If you want to talk about dark, that's how that would go.
Here’s the quote for anyone who can’t believe it:
The fact they gave this clown the keys to the DC kingdom is still as hilarious as it is tragic.
Well they gave those keys to the toxic feminist and the purple haired weirdos instead.The fact they gave this clown the keys to the DC kingdom is still as hilarious as it is tragic.
Well they gave those keys to the toxic feminist and the purple haired weirdos instead.
It's not. This had colossal bomb written all over it. That's why every studio passed and it went to Netflix.Hard to believe a synder joint is this bad.
A review I read earlier specifically called out the cinematography and action as bad because he decided to do the cinematography himself for this one and the story is all set up and never gets going.I generally love Snyder movies and I fully expect this to have great cinematography and action and the story and dialogue to be average.
Reflective of life in San Francisco you mean.These DEI loons need to see fictional worlds reflective of the world we live in today.
This is where Im at too. I do wish both would join up with better writers or do what Cameron did and marry one.I love Snyder's films for the same reason I love Michael Bay films. I find them fun. They're not supposed to be meaningful or thought-provoking. They both know how to work the camera and add visual flair where it matters. Fuuuuck the haters.
I love Snyder's films for the same reason I love Michael Bay films. I find them fun. They're not supposed to be meaningful or thought-provoking.
Sure he indulges he's films into topics that like you say come across pretentious, I credit him for the attempt. There isn't an art film I don't find pretentious anyway. Just look at every Terrence Malick film, holy fuck they're pretentious but loved because they're considered arthouse. I find Sucker Punch to be he's best attempt at trying to appease two audiences, it doesn't quite land, but he gets more scrutiny for it than he should.Snyder thinks they are, as do his fans. That's kind of the problem. If he just made popcorn flicks without all the pretentious stuff he doesn't entirely understand on top, his stuff would be fine. Good, even. Michael Bay knows where his talents lie, and doesn't go outside his wheelhouse. Snyder constantly thinks he's smarter than he actually is, and ruins most of his movies because of it.
Again - Dawn Of The Dead remake is absolutely fucking great, because it plays to his strengths. It's simple, unpretentious fun. He can handle that. He just can't handle anything that requires deeper thought, context or complexity.
He thinks he's (and wants to be) Chris Nolan, but he's actually Paul WS Anderson, or Michael Bay. No shame in that.
Sure he indulges he's films into topics that like you say come across pretentious, I credit him for the attempt. There isn't an art film I don't find pretentious anyway. Just look at every Terrence Malick film, holy fuck they're pretentious but loved because they're considered arthouse. I find Sucker Punch to be he's best attempt at trying to appease two audiences, it doesn't quite land, but he gets more scrutiny for it than he should.
He doesn't think he's Nolan, Bay, or Anderson. He's crafted he's own style and has become recognized in the industry as Zack Snyder!
Zack Snyder!
Bless you Manabyte! Zack is only love
What I mean is he's attempt at commentary, not attempt to be pretentious - like what? lolMalick's movies are loved because he's a very accomplished storyteller and visual artist.
It's nice for you to credit Snyder with an attempt at being pretentious. The rest of us would rather he just made half decent movies, instead of the endless parade of self indulgent, poorly executed duds he makes now.
What I mean is he's attempt at commentary, not attempt to be pretentious - like what? lol
He's a very much style over substance director, and is easily one of the most visually distinct directors in the industry. The colour grade he uses, one-shots with no cuts; he's cinematic technique with camera panning, even the way he storyboards comic book adaptations. A brilliant visual storyteller. An underrated director. It would be ideal to have he's films complimented with better writing, but this does not reflect poorly on Snyder's ability as a director in my opinion, and he's films are at the bare minimum "half decent".
Can you watch this and not be impressed with the shots? The man does not need a cinematographer.
Defending Snyder by trying to shit on Malick.Sure he indulges he's films into topics that like you say come across pretentious, I credit him for the attempt. There isn't an art film I don't find pretentious anyway. Just look at every Terrence Malick film, holy fuck they're pretentious but loved because they're considered arthouse. I find Sucker Punch to be he's best attempt at trying to appease two audiences, it doesn't quite land, but he gets more scrutiny for it than he should.
He doesn't think he's Nolan, Bay, or Anderson. He's crafted he's own style and has become recognized in the industry as Zack Snyder!
Looking at his log, I've only seen the 300 movies, Wonder Woman 1, and Man of Steel. I liked them. I saw bits of pieces of Watchmen (the only parts I remember is that giant god like hero kicking ass). No doubt the plots seem as thin and predictable as ever, but I enjoy his giant battle scenes and style. Although the final fight in MoS was way too long. It went on forever like a video game boss battle. He's an all style, zero substance kind of director.
Looking at his log, I've only seen the 300 movies, Wonder Woman 1, and Man of Steel.
He had script input on wonder woman 1, that movie was directed by patty Jenkins.
Its weird the hate boner some of you guys have for Snyder.
I'm not arguing he's the best film-maker ever, but Goddamn there's no way he's that bad either!
Objective worst-case is that he's middling.
Dawn of the Dead remake was great.
300 was visually revolutionary even if ultimately its less than the sum of its parts.
Watchmen has its problems, but it works extremely hard to be faithful to book/series that was considered unflimable for years. Its certainly light-years better than that abortion of a TV show bearing the name.
Sucker Punch was gutted by the studio/MPAA, accused of misogyny, and is actually a whole lot better than its reputation suggests if you see the unrated version - as it actually makes sense with the missing material reinstated.
Man Of Steel is for me one of the better Superman movies, and really is only let down by an excess of CG at the climax.
BvS, again, is way better in its unedited form. Yes, its got its issues but for me is way better than Marvel's Civil War, a worse and even less plausible story that apparently people gave a pass to as at that point the red brand could do no wrong. It also pays off -by design- the stuff that people bitched about with the end of MoS - in the sense that Bruce Wayne's concerns about Supe's potential threat doesn't come entirely out of left field.
As to Suicide Squad... well there we have an actual example of Snyder's version vs the Studio's mandated cut... and everyone knows which was worse!
Is this the greatest (selective) filmography in the space? Hell, no. But you cannot argue that there aren't things worthy of praise in there either.
The reality is that Snyder would have been best employed to adapt Frank Miller's Dark Knight Returns, as that's unquestionably a massive influence on how he envisions the DC characters, and is clearly way more in tune with his personal tastes.
But of course, that wouldn't fit into the whole "cinematic universe" marketing lollapalooza initiated by Marvel's hot run... so this is what he was allowed to make.
Going to have agree with you here! Unfortunately his last Zombie movie on Netflix gave me headache with the blurred effects.It's a Zack Snyder movie.
I expect cool visuals and mediocre everything else.
Snyder didn't make Suicide Squad.As to Suicide Squad... well there we have an actual example of Snyder's version vs the Studio's mandated cut... and everyone knows which was worse!
Its weird the hate boner some of you guys have for Snyder.
I'm not arguing he's the best film-maker ever, but Goddamn there's no way he's that bad either!
Objective worst-case is that he's middling.
Dawn of the Dead remake was great.
300 was visually revolutionary even if ultimately its less than the sum of its parts.
Watchmen has its problems, but it works extremely hard to be faithful to book/series that was considered unflimable for years. Its certainly light-years better than that abortion of a TV show bearing the name.
Sucker Punch was gutted by the studio/MPAA, accused of misogyny, and is actually a whole lot better than its reputation suggests if you see the unrated version - as it actually makes sense with the missing material reinstated.
Man Of Steel is for me one of the better Superman movies, and really is only let down by an excess of CG at the climax.
BvS, again, is way better in its unedited form. Yes, its got its issues but for me is way better than Marvel's Civil War, a worse and even less plausible story that apparently people gave a pass to as at that point the red brand could do no wrong. It also pays off -by design- the stuff that people bitched about with the end of MoS - in the sense that Bruce Wayne's concerns about Supe's potential threat doesn't come entirely out of left field.
As to Suicide Squad... well there we have an actual example of Snyder's version vs the Studio's mandated cut... and everyone knows which was worse!
Is this the greatest (selective) filmography in the space? Hell, no. But you cannot argue that there aren't things worthy of praise in there either.
The reality is that Snyder would have been best employed to adapt Frank Miller's Dark Knight Returns, as that's unquestionably a massive influence on how he envisions the DC characters, and is clearly way more in tune with his personal tastes.
But of course, that wouldn't fit into the whole "cinematic universe" marketing lollapalooza initiated by Marvel's hot run... so this is what he was allowed to make.
Snyder didn't make Suicide Squad.
Sucker Punch with gratuitous nudity would have been the greatest film ever made....change my mind!!!I...love Sucker Punch.
What I mean is he's attempt at commentary, not attempt to be pretentious - like what? lol
He's a very much style over substance director, and is easily one of the most visually distinct directors in the industry. The colour grade he uses, one-shots with no cuts; he's cinematic technique with camera panning, even the way he storyboards comic book adaptations. A brilliant visual storyteller. An underrated director. It would be ideal to have he's films complimented with better writing, but this does not reflect poorly on Snyder's ability as a director in my opinion, and he's films are at the bare minimum "half decent".
Can you watch this and not be impressed with the shots? The man does not need a cinematographer.
People expect every movie to be 11/10 and change their life’s.I didn't expect much. Probably will be a fun popcorn flick to watch with a couple beers.
Bloodsport rules.
Those scenes in the video were incredible! Even if you don't like the movies, you can't deny his eye for great shots and cinematography!
DamSnyder and IGN are both trash