ShadyAcshuns
Member
Some acting like 30fps is "unplayable" when a very large majority of people won't care. Especially a GP game that no one will be paying anything for.What hyperbole are you actually seeing?
Some acting like 30fps is "unplayable" when a very large majority of people won't care. Especially a GP game that no one will be paying anything for.What hyperbole are you actually seeing?
Well I think GamePass gives them some leaway to release a game incomplete and update it later. When you don't count on a ton of $70 sales Day 1, you don't need to start with the most polished product. So it's more of a byproduct of not having to go for millions of $70 sales in the first month or so of release.
Fall Guys?Any game with the word "fall" in it fails it seems.
Godfall
Babylon's Fall
Redfall
First page, "keeping track of multiple users can't be that taxing".From what I'm seeing, no one is shitting on the developer, just shitting on the decision to allow the game to be released in this state. Needs to be delayed.
BasicallyNo, because 4K screenshots are better in 4K for marketing and we all know marketing is the priority for most AAA games.
This isn't really a case of "the game is too ambitious for 60fps". They're just rushing it out the door for whatever reason.I wanna laugh, but i feel like this is gonna be common on consoles. I hope i'm wrong.
Sure but more pixels results in lower framerate in like 99% of all games. And I don't get the obsession, especially if they add motion blur or some other effect to hide the stutter that will blur the pixels they just managed to force in there.If it's a CPU bottleneck then the resolution matters very little until they fix the underlying problem.
Not here to shit post by any means and while I too would have preferred the 60fps version over the 30fps 4k version, I (and none of us here) have ANY idea what those meetings looked like and what expectations were placed on the dev team.
Co-op game play in a large shared environment is difficult to do performantly. Games are not easy to make and a very V E R Y select few developers have unlimited time, talent, and budget.
Play it or don't play it totally up to you...just please stop shitting on the developer because you THINK you know what the fuck goes into making a game today.
First page, "keeping track of multiple users can't be that taxing".
This one referring to GK?That's referring to Gotham Knights
But it's the truth. There are negative consequences to subscriptions services and when you change the overall goal, the main cash incentive, things change.This is a HORRIBLE excuse! Just TERRIBLE!!!
Lolnow redfall is everyone's most anticipated game because the 60 FPS mode on console not being there at launch is the the deal breaker huh? Hopefully arkane gets that patch out for consoles soon. Man people love their negative Xbox news.
Some acting like 30fps is "unplayable" when a very large majority of people won't care. Especially a GP game that no one will be paying anything for.
This one referring to GK?
"This game looks like a mid-tier Xbox One game. No reason for no 60 fps mode unless Arkane is incompetent."
"The majority won't care" is top tier copium.Some acting like 30fps is "unplayable" when a very large majority of people won't care. Especially a GP game that no one will be paying anything for.
Let's just say that the bulk of the snide comments are from people who were never going to play the game.What hyperbole are you actually seeing?
But it's the truth. There are negative consequences to subscriptions services and when you change the overall goal, the main cash incentive, things change.
Hell I think GP is leading to some of these xbox devs leaving. I bet they don't get sales bonuses like they used to. If you hit people in the pocket book, shit happens.
Since u just join this forum, i will throw you a bone rookie. its ok to have a 30fps mode if you have some really good tech and graphics going on but you should STILL offer a 60fps option. Redfall has none of this going for it.Some acting like 30fps is "unplayable" when a very large majority of people won't care. Especially a GP game that no one will be paying anything for.
![]()
To be fair to greenberg, This was during the brief period where xbox series was the 'worlds most powerful console' right before something changed and it got rebranded to the 'worlds most powerful xbox'. If you know you know.
Nobody will care except for a few forum elites, and console warriors."The majority won't care" is top tier copium.
Both Microsoft and Sony plastered 4K/120 badges all over their top end product for marketing. As has been linked in this thread multiple times, Aaron Greenberg doubled down on 60fps as the standard output.
Stop making excuses for terrible developer decisions because the game will be on Game Pass. 30fps only from a (now) first party studio on the "most powerful console ever" is an absolute fucking joke In 2023.
It'll be added later on, just play something else if you don't like quality mode.Since u just join this forum, i will throw you a bone rookie. its ok to have a 30fps mode if you have some really good tech and graphics going on but you should STILL offer a 60fps option. Redfall has none of this going for it.
I'm a nostalgic too but if we're honest many games from that era ran badly and it was only good enough because we didn't know better and had few games that ran better to compare. Even the hyped up Halo was uneven 25fps on PAL Xbox, 10/10 everywhere but the stutter gave me motion sickness so bad that I skipped the IP for years.I know that it's not close to 30 FPS but it was fine when I played it back then. At least it delivered some nice looking graphics, awesome gameplay, those gun reloads were something else. Lastly it had a good scenario. It packed a great multiplayer experience and more.
Maybe this industry needs a good shaking up?This will fuck up the gaming industry with this thought.
Maybe because MS needs to release something since the release calendar is dryer than grandmas veejayjay?This isn't really a case of "the game is too ambitious for 60fps". They're just rushing it out the door for whatever reason.
They changed the branding when they announced the Series S so they could show the difference between the two. If you know, you know.
Sorry, but I have no idea how dry your grandmas veejayjay is. Do tell though as I'm intrigued now.Maybe because MS needs to release something since the release calendar is dryer than grandmas veejayjay?
Same. I wish they'd all just make AAA banger games and have 3rd parties do the indie/AA/mobile/live service crap.I agree with you. I just hate that this is where Microsoft has decided to go with their gaming business.![]()
When did I say the 60 fps is fake concern? Must be putting words in my mouth but I understand you have no multiplayer games to keep you busy.
of course you didnt... because i bet you can't even "see" the difference.When did I say the 60 fps is fake concern? Must be putting words in my mouth but I understand you have no multiplayer games to keep you busy.
Only one and done games that you can finish within a week lol
sure pretty riky. because they didnt know they were going to launch a series S beforehand....They changed the branding when they announced the Series S so they could show the difference between the two. If you know, you know.
Why do people got to wait? wasnt this game already delayed? or does this launching into gamepass give it a pass when these modes should be standard at this point? just sounds like more excuses, but if you like that then do you. Either way its embarrassing. but hey at least u didnt have to pay that 70$ for it!Nobody will care except for a few forum elites, and console warriors.
It'll be added later on, just play something else if you don't like quality mode.
So when did I say anything about 60 fps? We were talking about a mini boss fight. Also, it looked like it ran well on ign video (might be PC version). Just a bad player is all.of course you didnt... because i bet you can't even "see" the difference.
![]()