I don't need to see their stupid app to know this is an awful idea. Why the hell do I need to pay for their guaranteed to be crappy online service and use my phone to chat/join lobbies/see friends? I'm already paying a cell phone bill for voice chat so what value is Nintendo offering? It's cumbersome, inconvenient, and reeks of pure incompetence but then again I should have expected as much from nintendo. They have always had a terrible online service from friend code BS to Miiverse and Switch looks to be no different.I think people need to calm down and wait until we SEE this app.
Then we can proceed to shit on it if it's as bad as it sounds.
Hmm. Im.going to wait and see how it goes before jumping to conclusions.
Absolutely, but we don't know if the app can interact/communicate with the console in any way.It's not on the console, it's on a separate device that you may or may not have.
What else could you possibly need to know to confirm that it's a shit idea?
I will have to see. I still think it's mostly to save battery in portable mode. The OS needs an overview but there are probably such features when docked.
the switch doesn't have a microphone
What the hell does that have to do with matchmaking? Is Reggie just speaking out of his ass? Does he know what mm is?
None of this makes sense.
The Switch isn't a 4G/LTE device, you can only play online through wifi.
To play online you have to use your smartphone to download an app that connects to your Nintendo account that connects to your Switch through magic apparently to handle all things we consider basic online functionality.
Why? How is that more elegant than something integrated?
Removing basic features is innovative and different.So has anyone tried defending this also
Seems for any of the many fuckups there's always people defending it for the Switch
Wow. One of the few voices of reason is this cesspool of a thread. I applaud you friend. I'm right with you.
He's trying to say that you will use your headphones that most phone users carry, which again makes no sense because can't I just plug those headphones into the Switch itself? It's all bullshit haha
Because AMD was holding them back...
I find it amusing that Nintendo believes it's disrupting the market, when in actuality, they've perfected the art of disrupting themselves.
Has anyone worked out a logical reason why this all handled via a phone app anyway? If I'm being forced to use my phone, why not just conference call everyone?
I didn't affect battery life on the 3DS.
3DS supported voice chat. Heroes of Ruin, if nothing else, proved that.3DS doesn't have any of this functionalityin its OS either as far as I recall.
Removing basic features is innovative and different.
It's like they want the good momentum Switch was building up to be for nothing and destroy it day by day until launch.
I'm pretty sure 3DS battery life was quite a bit better with wifi off.
The last week has been like:Considering GAF since the last week, what good momentum?
I think I know why Nintendo is doing this.
They've always been hesitant to allow voice chat, because it might mean children being subjected to all sorts of foul language and inappropriate topics. By tying this functionality to phones, they are protecting very young kids from it and also ensuring that the kids that do have it are deemed mature enough by their parents to own a cell phone.
Of course, the fact that you'll need a paid subscription to access online in the future anyway somewhat disproves this theory.
They straight up said the online service would be in a trial stage until this fall, when the full paid service rolls out officially. You can be sure that what's in place at launch will be missing features.
The wording is poor, but obviously you'll be able to play bomberman, and MK8, and splatoon, and arms, etc etc without this app and before the paid service launches. Games will still internally 'match make'
Also why are people talking about holding a phone to your face? Bluetooth link a pair of ear buds w/mic or your "bulky headset" to the phone, app active, phone asleep. Sure not exactly the simplest thing, but if necessary to offload and have games running online as smooth as possible... *shrug*
The wording is poor, but obviously you'll be able to play bomberman, and MK8, and splatoon, and arms, etc etc without this app and before the paid service launches. Games will still internally 'match make'
Also why are people talking about holding a phone to your face? Bluetooth link a pair of ear buds w/mic or your "bulky headset" to the phone, app active, phone asleep. Sure not exactly the simplest thing, but if necessary to offload and have games running online as smooth as possible... *shrug*
No, I agree, user experience is going to be pretty integral to the whole thing, and its mostly pointless to speculate how that user experience will be because it could well be awkward and cumbersome as fuck.
I'm just saying social features "as an app" conceptually makes a lot of sense.
More sense for people who actually own smartphones than those that don't, I will admit though.
MS managed this on the Xbox. As in the original Xbox.
Can somebody explain the "bulky headset" thing to me... So instead of carrying the headset, you hold your phone to your ear to voice chat? Burning up your battery? Or is he saying you put it on speaker? This makes no fucking sense. Couldn't they just build a mic into the handheld?
Wow. One of the few voices of reason is this cesspool of a thread. I applaud you friend. I'm right with you.
MS managed this on the Xbox. As in the original Xbox.
3DS doesn't have any of this functionalityin its OS either as far as I recall.
I think I know why Nintendo is doing this.
They've always been hesitant to allow voice chat, because it might mean children being subjected to all sorts of foul language and inappropriate topics. By tying this functionality to phones, they are protecting very young kids from it and also ensuring that the kids that do have it are deemed mature enough by their parents to own a cell phone.
Of course, the fact that you'll need a paid subscription to access online in the future anyway somewhat disproves this theory.
and why haven't they had time to figure this stuff out?
like what have they been doing? i just don't understand why this can't be "ready."