Hitokage said:The flying fuck we are. With evolution being one of the most supported and tested theories in all of science, those who counter it by taking the writings of 4000 year old men as literal infallable truth hardly match up. SUPPORT is what matters, it ultimately doesn't matter WHO you are or what you've done before... status alone means nothing to a claim's veracity. There are no authorities in science.
Creationism has been making noise as a larger push by fundamentalist christians in an reactionary attack on science and liberalism. The recent trend of "Intelligent Design" is just their new method to not get immediately smacked down in court on first amendment grounds.
It is true that natural selection (change in color, loss of wings, became blind) is supported via mutations (which is loss of genetic information or re-shuffling of the same genetic makeup) but it's the "fish-to-philosopher" evolution that is still in question because it requires new genetic information, not a loss/reshuffling of the existing genetic information.
"There is no known law of nature, no known process and no known sequence of events which can cause information to originate by itself in matter."- Dr. Werner Gitt
(director and professor at the German Federal Institute of Physics and Technology (Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Braunschweig), the Head of the Department of Information Technology)
*waiting for someone to pull up a Talk.Origins article*