On RTX cards, the bulk of DLSS software runs on Tensor co-processors.
You should probably play some games on PC for once in your life.
While it can be semantically correct, I actually take an issue with calling something like 'lowering resolution' an optimization at all. Admittedly outside of GDC presentation we rarely get to discuss more interesting optimization work, so for RT it'll be sometime out before we see what (if anything) is possible.
I been building and playing PC games since 98.
Works without it.
There's a reason why demon souls isn't the best looking game, technically speaking. It's because the console isn't as powerful as what has been out/currently out/coming out for PC.
So when it releases on "PC", don't you think it will look better, and with raytracing support? I still don't think it'll be the best looking game on PC, especially from a technical standpoint.
What is the transfer speed from the SSD to the vram in ratchet and clank, DemSouls, or whatever game you choose? If you don't have a clue, you shouldn't make baseless claims like that. Also, do you think the consoles will have better raytracing/textures in cyberpunk for instance? If not, your statement holds no weight.
Not sure what this has to do with gaming, or this thread at all?
Without SSD, the game hitches
You have to sign up for the UE4 plugin here https://developer.nvidia.com/rtxgi
Again talks talks talks. I say to post a picture which shows WD with better reflection compared MM, but nope, there is even a Epic developer who claimed it's one of the best implementation seen until now, but obviously different opinion doesn't counts for you, and you continue to give air to the same narrative without care of everything else. Stop to call facts, indisputable a bunch of guesses by you and Dictator, they are opinions like others, I literally not have idea where coming because on the picture I don't see that better quality like we can see something of concrete about such tech disquisition? Because I don't see anything of better in the WD solution compared MM from the videos available on the net. Period. Be a bit more humble if I can say.We are comparing the PC version of WD:L to the PS5 version of MM.
I'll say this yet again, if you think seeing all the objects in the world to infinity at a lower quality is your definition of "better" reflections, then I won't argue that. You won't hear me fight that at all.
If, however, you think that the quality of the reflection is better, then you are factually WRONG. Period. This isn't up for debate.
Watch Dogs: Legion - how does console ray tracing compare to Nvidia RTX?
Hardware accelerated ray tracing is now firmly established in triple-A titles on PC and with the transition to next gen…www.eurogamer.net
So now post a screenshot to prove your point means nothing because obviously it's impossible ti see a better reflection on WD compared MM from it and it goes against your useless long explanation, my personal guess. But some days agos you downplayed even the SSS implementation on MM and just from a single picture provided by DF; I'm asking what is changed today and why screenshot comparison is no more helpful for such discussion, mmmm.
Dude... i'm no graphics tech specialist, but i don't need to be one to understand how having multiple reflective surfaces in scene, all with reflections inside reflections, more convincing transparency and higher res is way more complex to reproduce in real time than just having more objects inside the reflection. No picture in the world will convince you if you can't understand that.
Post the twitter, I beg you.
Dude can you show me a picture with all those magnificent stuff on WD on console, pointing out such details in the following video:
The problem is that it's a 1st gen implementation by AMD and far less optimised for Ray Tracing than NVidia's 30 series and DLSS solution, which offers a 2x performance increase all-round in Ray Tracing from the 20 series. And developers have opted for dynamic resolution on PS5, not a DLSS solution, which has resulted in a lot of 1440p-4K in Ray Traced games.
forum.beyond3d.com
I'm already aware of RDNA 2's lack of brute force RT hardware performance, hence my next GPU card RTX 3080 Ti 20GB from MSI RTX 2080 Ti Gaming X Trio OC and Blender 3D's hardware RT acceleration is important.
Why does it have to be on console? RT tech is on PC also, and probably what VFX was mostly referencing until now
I'm not 100% in-the-know of how RT tech works exactly, but at least mathematicaly speaking, based on what i know RT does, even just a single level more of recursion here would lead to an exponential growth in complexity.
PS5 has been out for, what, 2 weeks? I mean, how many released examples can you even give for the ps5 here?
DS and SM MM look better than anything on PC.
AMD Radeon RDNA2 Navi (RX 6500, 6600, 6700, 6800, 6900 XT)
I guess simultaneous launch of Ryzen 5000, RDNA2 card, XBSX/S and PS5 has proven too much and EPYC Milan with 8 Chiplets each , CDNA... Supply is not able to keep up. Zen3 chips are not even listed in most etailers.
Love Dictator's deflection.
Because I don't compare a more powerful pc with RTX tested from years Vs a weaker hardware in its first steps. Of course on pc raytracing is better. But on console the raytracing showed in Spiderman is the most impressive and in WD (on console) is very limited.
Now let not spit out nonsense.
No, this isn't the reason. Its devs said they were going to add RT but at the end they didn't implemented it because they are a relatively small team for AAA games (under 100 people) and the game had to be ready for launch, so didn't have time to implement all the things they wanted to implement, and RT was one of them.
If you think MM or DS on ps5 are more impressive games even for pc, you are completely wrong with all respect. You can achieve similar result just with the mod pack of The Witcher 3.
They are and like I said nothing coming (been announced for PC)
You are free to believe whatever you want.
Read above
assurdum
Not even offline rendering does infinite level of recursion. Of course, it's just a 2nd level. It's still more accurate than no level of recursion like in MM.
There is my video. Full 4k. Ultra settings. You see the popping across the street. That's not the point of the video. The point is to show all the things that DF stated was superior to MM in the reflection quality that is being reflected.
I can't believe people are that delusional and have little fanboy logic to deny that. Its as if these fanboys have blinders on, and refuse to open their eyes, unless it's Sony, ps5, or playstation related. They can't even give credit to cyberpunk which blows the doors off any ps5 exclusive. Not to mention how the ps5 version is actually the ps4 version. And there was even word about how the next gen patch is going to be released later, due to technical difficulties with console version. You'd imagine that "super fast SSD" could fix all these issues, if you'd listen to
yurinka
and
S0ULZB0URNE
funny posts.
I can't believe people are that delusional and have little fanboy logic to deny that. Its as if these fanboys have blinders on, and refuse to open their eyes, unless it's Sony, ps5, or playstation related. They can't even give credit to cyberpunk which blows the doors off any ps5 exclusive. Not to mention how the ps5 version is actually the ps4 version. And there was even word about how the next gen patch is going to be released later, due to technical difficulties with console version. You'd imagine that "super fast SSD" could fix all these issues, if you'd listen to
- over the top ridiculous.
Developers know how to master a closed box, they only need time to build their engines (the one of the demo won't be ready until end of 2021) and until then they will make mostly crossgen games with tweaked previous gen engines.
www.digitaltrends.com
You can get the updated data here:As of 2018 1.14% Steam User play games at 4K. 3.12% play at 1440p.
Steam survey shows PC gamers are still mostly playing in 1080p and lower
Valve Software’s latest hardware and software survey for July reveals that 63.72 percent of Steam’s registered members still play games with a 1,920 x 1,080 resolution. Even more, 13.33 percent of Steam’s gamers play at 1,366 x 768 while only 1.14 percent are playing at 3,840 x 2,160.
PC is great, but lets not pretend every PC is a beast. Lol.
Do you even know how to math?! No wonder your posts don't make the most sense. 3/4 or over 75% of pc players play in 1080p or above.
Due to Sony's strict DRM controls, Sony artfically stops PS5 games from running from USB 3.0 (5 GBbps) external drive. Sony is controlling your purchased game console's usage.
Yes, I know maths, I'm a game programmer. I mentioned the numbers of 'Primary Display Resolution', which is the resolution of the main (and in most cases only) display that people has.Do you even know how to math?! No wonder your posts don't make the most sense. 3/4 or over 75% of pc players play in 1080p or above.
Then over 3/4 of PC players with at least 2 monitors much higher than single 1080p, if not more, unlike the b.s. you just pulled out of thin air.
At least try not to so disingenuous. Also, how many ps5 games actually play in true native 4K at least 60fps with raytracing, ultra pc settings, and not checkerboard? Hmmmm...Didn't think so....
PS5 uses USB 3.2 gen 2 (10Gbps) to use there up to these external HDD or SSD.
