It doesn't. The OP is clearly and obviously talking about replaceable batteries in relation to gaming, and using them with game controllers. I'm not sure how mobile phones (and someone else brought up automobiles) are relevant to the discussion.Kind of brings your own intelligence into question, doesn’t it?
I'm going to tell you something that might absolutely shock you...There's nothing wrong with internal lithium ion batteries. What should change is the ease of access to them. According to ifixit it's around a 20 minute process to unclip the bottom of the DualSense controller, replace the battery and reassemble. The cost of the battery is about $20ish dollars as well. Given that the batteries last for several years, and you can even buy higher capacity ones, I think that's a great solution. The only way this could be improved in my opinion is if manufacturers had a screwed-shut flap on the back that enabled easy access to just that compartment.
But let's play devil's advocate here. Let's say in this scenario controllers still use AA batteries. I invest the $35 into a four pack of eneloop AA's and a wall charger. Now I have to keep track of the batteries, have make a permanent spot on my wall for this damn charger to live that I use all the time, and then, in a few years, buy more fuckin batteries because EVEN THESE WEAR OUT! I'm just... making the original problem more complicated! All this versus just plugging in the controller into the same damn cord that I use for my phone and my steam deck and my "massage gun" and my laptop and all the other shit around that uses this charging interface.
TL;DR: $20 and 20 minutes of your time every couple years is not that big of a fuckin deal.
We’ve already gone through a generation of built-in batteries in controllers and it was well proven they can last the entire generation.It doesn't. The OP is clearly and obviously talking about replaceable batteries in relation to gaming, and using them with game controllers. I'm not sure how mobile phones (and someone else brought up automobiles) are relevant to the discussion.
If I'm not mistaken, most people change their cell phones every year or every two years. And on average, it takes about two years before one notices any degradation or decrease in battery life, on their phones. A console generation cycle usually lasts 5 to 7 years... Your controller batteries won't last that long, especially without degradation.
In fact, you can list and compare (on paper) the pros and cons of each, and normal replaceable batteries comes out with more pros, every time. Which pros/cons are more important to an individual, however, is entirely subjective.
I bought an Xbox 360 after the ROD debacle, and guess what, the controller still works to this day, minus some minor stick issues. One huge pro of controllers with replaceable batteries, is that you can also buy a li-ion, rechargeable battery pack. You don't have that option, stock, with in-built li-ion batteries.
But yes, I am the unintelligent one.
Which controllers do you have that no longer work? I have old Dual Shock 3 controllers and original Move controllers that work. I can't think of any I have that do not.They have a life expectancy and I am now left with a bunch of controllers that don't charge and either need to be connected or don't even work.
Please enlighten me.
One of us is confused. Did my post mention anything about Xbox? The argument is about internal versus external. So my post talks about how existing internal batteries don't need or deserve to be demonized. It doesn't matter how good the xbox controller's charging solution is for PS or Switch players.I'm going to tell you something that might absolutely shock you...
Xbox controllers allow you to quickly and very easily pop off the battery panel, to replace or insert any type of battery - from single-use AA, rechargeable AA, to Xbox's own li-ion rechargeable battery pack, to battery backs from many, many other manufacturers/providers.
And just like that, using the standard model of replaceable AA batteries, consumers now have myriad choices for the types of batteries they want to use on their controller, and the ease in choosing and installing one. Whaddayaknow
YesDo you want replaceable batteries for your mobile phone as well? That’s even more expensive and dies faster because the usage is much higher than that of a controller.
And then it’ll be the best thing ever.Soon xbox will have built in batteries and we won't talk about it ever
Fuck my iPhone. There will be a new.Do you want replaceable batteries for your mobile phone as well? That’s even more expensive and dies faster because the usage is much higher than that of a controller.
"I was wrong" threadAnd then it’ll be the best thing ever.
Your controller will die. There is no doubt about it.I've never in my life had a controller stop working because it wouldn't charge.
Oh yeah? How so?Controller built-in batteries are also very easily replaceable.
Dualsense won’t work wired with really dead battery.And wires are even better! Never have to recharge or buy new ones!
Be honest OP, you saw them talking about this today on Digital Foundry Direct right?
But to chime in, I like Sony's approach. Yes it sucks that years down the road when the system is 2 generations old that the batteries die and you can only use the controllers wired but worth it for the convenience while the system is still current.
Batterieries used to be easily replaceable in phones, so sure?Do you want replaceable batteries for your mobile phone as well? That’s even more expensive and dies faster because the usage is much higher than that of a controller.
On the other side, they are making more money by not providing batteries. So they might try to continue this way.Soon xbox will have built in batteries and we won't talk about it ever
Lol you are wrong.Built in batteries is the way to go, I've never a controller die on me because of its battery, and rechargeable ones are a pain in the ass + built in batteries more environment friendly.
My PS3 died before my controller could then.Your controller will die. There is no doubt about it.
There are tons and tons of ps3 controllers that don’t charge at all anymore. In fact it might be hard to find a good one sometimes
Bruh, this is one of the most pathetic arguments of console gaming. It's going to get to a point where people start arguing about which size screws they prefer on their console of choice.Why don't the controllers with rechargeable batteries have an easy way to remove and replace th... oh wait, that's right, because those bozos at Sony want you to spend 80 buckaroos to replace the entire fucking controller instead.
Silly me.
It's less waste in the long run.That doesn’t answer the question though.
Built-in, rechargeable batteries are easier to use. Less busy work.
I got my batteries charger connected to my Xbox via usbThere's nothing wrong with internal lithium ion batteries. What should change is the ease of access to them. According to ifixit it's around a 20 minute process to unclip the bottom of the DualSense controller, replace the battery and reassemble. The cost of the battery is about $20ish dollars as well. Given that the batteries last for several years, and you can even buy higher capacity ones, I think that's a great solution. The only way this could be improved in my opinion is if manufacturers had a screwed-shut flap on the back that enabled easy access to just that compartment.
But let's play devil's advocate here. Let's say in this scenario controllers still use AA batteries. I invest the $35 into a four pack of eneloop AA's and a wall charger. Now I have to keep track of the batteries, have make a permanent spot on my wall for this damn charger to live that I use all the time, and then, in a few years, buy more fuckin batteries because EVEN THESE WEAR OUT! I'm just... making the original problem more complicated! All this versus just plugging in the controller into the same damn cord that I use for my phone and my steam deck and my "massage gun" and my laptop and all the other shit around that uses this charging interface.
TL;DR: $20 and 20 minutes of your time every couple years is not that big of a fuckin deal.
Do you want replaceable batteries for your mobile phone as well? That’s even more expensive and dies faster because the usage is much higher than that of a controller.
Yes.Do you want replaceable batteries for your mobile phone as well? That’s even more expensive and dies faster because the usage is much higher than that of a controller.
This. I wish Sony made this accessible just as the SSD compartment in PS5. Or even HDD in PS2/3/4.if manufacturers had a screwed-shut flap on the back that enabled easy access to just that compartment.
2000’s is when replaceable batteries in phones were around.Mate, are you stuck in the early 2000s?
They use the exact same chemistry. It's just proprietary ones are custom shaped to fit into devices.
Congratulations? This is irrelevant and shortsightedMy PS3 died before my controller could then.
Way to ignore my point.2000’s is when replaceable batteries in phones were around.
You say narrative as if there's some false consensus reached. When a chargeable battery is one of the options available to a controller that gives you multiple options, a version of that where the battery isn't easily accessible is objectively inferior. There's no 2 ways about it.I feel like this thread pops up every few months and it always comes from some Xbox is better narrative.
Honestly in what world do people want to buy or change batteries all the time over simply charging. While the odd persons controller night die, the vast majority of people's controllers last the gen unless they've been mongoloids and thrown them around.
I feel like this thread pops up every few months and it always comes from some Xbox is better narrative.
Honestly in what world do people want to buy or change batteries all the time over simply charging. While the odd persons controller night die, the vast majority of people's controllers last the gen unless they've been mongoloids and thrown them around.