Revisiting Dragon Age: The Veilguard - one year on, how have our thoughts changed

RagnarokIV

Battlebus imprisoning me \m/ >.< \m/

things are tougher for us in a five-star system. I do like how clear-cut five stars are, but it's complicated in other ways. Five stars is 'full marks' but is definitively not perfect, right? And less perfect than a 10 in a 10-point system, by design. So I look at my Dragon Age review on VG247 and feel three stars at a glance reads a little harshly - though if you read the text I think it's justified, obviously. But the truth is, three stars reads a little tough because The Veilguard is truly a 7/10-ass 7/10. But it's the lower end of a seven, so it gets three stars, but three stars translates on the aggregation sites to 60/100, or 6/10, which definitely looks harsher. See the complexity?

Decent is the word, right? I think you could look at this, look at our reviews, and see you and I at opposite ends of a chasmous spectrum. Truth is, though, I really enjoyed my time with Veilguard - I just think it's sort of less than the sum of its parts, to deploy a cloying cliche. At the same time, my respect for the people who made it was great to begin with and has only rocketed as I've learned more about its development.

Yes, I would score it differently now. I think I'd probably land on four stars, although my hedging there is telling. But to sit and reappraise in the cold light of a year's worth of reflection is also to overlook the passion I felt for the game when I reviewed it. I loved it - at the time I was certain of that. It gave me emotional highs and lows and some incredible set-pieces. And I don't want to discredit the excitement I felt by tutting at my past self now, because to feel excited by a game is the best magic they can offer.

Basically:
Elephant%27s_tea_party%2C_Robur_Tea_Room%2C_Sydney%2C_24_March_1939_-_Sam_Hood_%283529604677%29.jpg
 
Last edited:
I have had it downloaded but no time to try it. I doubt my thoughts were off. Looked like solid graphics, solid combat, shit story. I'll try it sometime.
 
By most accounts, given I haven't played the game, Veilguard seemed to land as the definition of "mid at best". And that's being generous, it seems, given the pedigree of the studio that created it.
 
The game was always trash and it literally put me to sleep.

Fighting a dragon was never this boring

Oh sorry I thought this was about Inquisition
 
Last edited:
The gameplay was decent enough

The writing, the interpersonal dialogue, the relationships, EVERYTHING that made Dragon Age interesting has been decimated by high school drama style writing.

Genuinely immature writing and dialogue are ridiculous - this game was written for 14 year olds
 
Hey guys, let's see what my foil wrapped turd turned into after a year of fermentation!

Oh....uh.....ya know what, let's just go to the mall instead! No, no, don't look at it.
 
Aside from Taash and the other indian chick, I thought the game was ok. Like 7+ out of 10 ok. I enjoyed it more than Dragon Age 2. Origins and Inquisition remain top shit tho.
 
Last edited:
I installed it on PC Gamepass but have not got through the opening sequence in the city being attacked.
Then Hogwarts Legacy went up on PC Gamepass and Velguard got deleted to make space.
I need a bigger M.2 in my PC. Got a 1TB that needs to get quadrupled in size soon.
 
It was trash then, it's trash now.

Don't even know why they're bothering to bring it up, thought they'd all moved on to defending the outer worlds 2.
 
I wasn't concerned about the politics at all. It was just such a nothing game. So incredibly bland. Which is in stark contrast to Dragon Age Origins which was full of heart and spirit.
 
Finished it recently.

Sticking to main quest generally results in good time.

Story / writing is on better side in video games. Will take this over a lot of other games that do this well.
 
This was another one of those drunken purchases I made just like I did with Suicide Squad for $10.

Fortunately I didn't taint my trophy list with it.
 
Frustrated Skip Bayless GIF


Eurogamer, stop.

I some times wonder if these outlets will ever realise they need to step away from defending and propagating activism-driven nonsense to stay in business, OR if they'll stubbornly stick to it until they run out of gas.
 
Last edited:
The gameplay was decent enough

The writing, the interpersonal dialogue, the relationships, EVERYTHING that made Dragon Age interesting has been decimated by high school drama style writing.

Genuinely immature writing and dialogue are ridiculous - this game was written for 14 year olds
Was it? I thought the gameplay looked fun at first. But I heard lots of reviews complaining about how spongy the enemies get later in the game, how the harder difficulty levels just crank up the enemy HP and it becomes a total slog without really being a challenge. They talked about how they turned the difficulty down because combat became so tedious and time consuming.

Also remember at least one video showing off how telegraphed the enemy attacks are. Some guy took down an ogre way above his level because it was so trivial to step outside the red circle and avoid every attack.
 
There is no space to think of new thoughts when it comes to Veilguard.

Just its mention is enough to fill my brain with yuck pics of Qunari. What an apt pic to describe the entire game.
 
Wow...how reasonable and balanced of Eurogamer to suggest a year later that perhaps, just perhaps, they got their review of this junk a teeny tiny bit wrong. Although still refusing to change their 5/5 for anyone unfortunate enough to give it any credence in the future.

How reasonable were they a year ago when they were not only deleting, within minutes, any negative comments on their 5/5 review that suggested the same thing, but were instantly shadow banning the accounts that made them? :messenger_angry:

One of the most mealy-mouthed and insincere mea culpa's I've read.
 
"But the truth is, three stars reads a little tough because The Veilguard is truly a 7/10-ass 7/10. But it's the lower end of a seven, so it gets three stars, but three stars translates on the aggregation sites to 60/100, or 6/10, which definitely looks harsher. See the complexity?"

john-connor.gif
 
Good graphics, decent enough gameplay, bad writing, and poor roleplaying. The problem is that bad writing sticks out the most in an RPG. There are too many examples of dialogue in the game being extremely shallow, robotic, and cringe-y.
 
Top Bottom