You mean a rich person pays $90k in order to exploit and make money off of other rich people?
I mean, it's amusing but c'mon - if someone did this to your street, you'd be pissed
I don't understand the response from most posters - this is extremely underhanded and exploitative, regardless of the financial means of the victims. The sale should be voided and he HOA should be given the opportunity to pay its taxes.
I don't live on a private street and I have no sympathy for those who do.
Can't hate the hustle. The new owners are alot more generous that I would be. I'd start charging the residents every time they use my street either by walking or using their car. It will be charged by feet of my street used. Rates will be reasonable and be based on income levels. Dogs and children under 5 will be free though and I'll run half-off Sunday promotions!
I don't live on a private street and I have no sympathy for those who do.
Selective sympathy eh?
Globally not everyone who lives on a private street is rich
I'm not a millionaire who can't be assed to pay 14$ a year.I mean, it's amusing but c'mon - if someone did this to your street, you'd be pissed
Selective sympathy eh?
I'm not a millionaire who can't be assed to pay 14$ a year.
Situations change. If someone was doing this to Trump tower or something I'd be cheering them on. To a homeless shelter? Not so much.
Living on a private street in the Presidio is not something I have sympathy for.
I can guarantee you everyone living on that street is a multimillionaire. Unless you think mansions in San Fran come cheap.
...yes? I don't have sympathy for child abusers, or murderers, or Trump. Or Rich people living on a private street who do anything to avoid paying taxes.
You can own a street?!
So, if someone is wealthy than they don't deserve sympathy? Not very kind of you.
Why are you bringing up criminals lol? We're talking about law-abiding citizens. These people pay their taxes, otherwise, they would be in jail.
So, if someone is wealthy than they don't deserve sympathy? Not very kind of you.
Why are you bringing up criminals lol? We're talking about law-abiding citizens. These people pay their taxes, otherwise, they would be in jail.
Would that be legal ? Over here you can't block someone from accessing their own property, they have a right of free traversal in such situations. It always makes for heated discussions in the countryside when farmers get to cross each other's fields and meadows.
I'm pretty sure the property owners didn't receive a letter saying 'if you don't pay $14 a year, the street goes bye bye'
In a letter to the city last month, Scott Emblidge, the attorney for the Presidio Homeowners Association, said the group had failed to pay up because its tax bill was being mailed to the Kearny Street address used by an accountant who hadnt worked for the homeowners since the 1980s.
Would that be legal ? Over here you can't block someone from accessing their own property, they have a right of free traversal in such situations. It always makes for heated discussions in the countryside when farmers get to cross each other's fields and meadows.
So, if someone is wealthy than they don't deserve sympathy? Not very kind of you.
Why are you bringing up criminals lol? We're talking about law-abiding citizens. These people pay their taxes, otherwise, they would be in jail.
Why would I have sympathy for rich people being told their street has been bought? It's delicious irony for all the fucking over they do to the rest of the populace.
To demonstrate that sympathy can be selective. I'm not saying they're criminals, nor am I implying they should be in jail.
'They are rich therefore deserve feck all sympathy' is a bit flawed in that I know some really nice folk who have worked their absolute asses off over the years to get to what would probably qualify as rich.
Financial wealth status should not really disqualify people from empathy any more than financially poor people
'They are rich therefore deserve feck all sympathy' is a bit flawed in that I know some really nice folk who have worked their absolute asses off over the years to get to what would probably qualify as rich.
Financial wealth status should not really disqualify people from empathy any more than financially poor people
I agree.'They are rich therefore deserve feck all sympathy' is a bit flawed in that I know some really nice folk who have worked their absolute asses off over the years to get to what would probably qualify as rich.
Financial wealth status should not really disqualify people from empathy any more than financially poor people
OK, this got less funny. Just some other real estate developer grabbing cash. Was hoping it would just be some regular people.
Jesus. Those are some hardcore-hideous McMansions.lol I know exactly where that is. Pretty ritzy
![]()
I'm pretty sure the property owners didn't receive a letter saying 'if you don't pay $14 a year, the street goes bye bye'
Where I am on this, as the son of two parents who worked (still work) their fucking asses off for their family and are now the only people in their respective extended families who could be considered upper middle class or rich (not own-a-mansion rich but put-two-children-through-private-school rich)'They are rich therefore deserve feck all sympathy' is a bit flawed in that I know some really nice folk who have worked their absolute asses off over the years to get to what would probably qualify as rich.
Financial wealth status should not really disqualify people from empathy any more than financially poor people
I don't live on a private street and I have no sympathy for those who do.
So, if someone is wealthy than they don't deserve sympathy? Not very kind of you.
Why are you bringing up criminals lol? We're talking about law-abiding citizens. These people pay their taxes, otherwise, they would be in jail.
Actually, they didn't pay their taxes, which is why their street was sold ...
Which you think happened due to an accident or intended avoidance?