• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Rich SF residents get a shock: Someone bought their street

Jeff-DSA

Member
Turn it into a moat and make them ferry across it to get to their homes. A dollar a crossing, every tenth crossing earns you one free crossing*.

*Free crossing subject to date and time restrictions. Cannot be combined with other offers. Non-transferable.
 

Trace

Banned
You mean a rich person pays $90k in order to exploit and make money off of other rich people?

giphy-downsized-large.gif
 

_Ryo_

Member
Set up a toll booth every 5 feet of the street and allow the needy to work at the booths.

Or after seeing this picture
2695366434_07c8390d16_z.jpg


Set up a toll booth before every incline/entrance to the side walk.
 

Dr.Guru of Peru

played the long game
I don't understand the response from most posters - this is extremely underhanded and exploitative, regardless of the financial means of the victims. The sale should be voided and he HOA should be given the opportunity to pay its taxes.
 

GK86

Homeland Security Fail
I would throw a block party once a month and invite all the "regular" folks to join.
 

Easy_D

never left the stone age
I don't understand the response from most posters - this is extremely underhanded and exploitative, regardless of the financial means of the victims. The sale should be voided and he HOA should be given the opportunity to pay its taxes.

I mean, they had an opportunity to do so for 30 years.
 

Alx

Member
Can't hate the hustle. The new owners are alot more generous that I would be. I'd start charging the residents every time they use my street either by walking or using their car. It will be charged by feet of my street used. Rates will be reasonable and be based on income levels. Dogs and children under 5 will be free though and I'll run half-off Sunday promotions!

Would that be legal ? Over here you can't block someone from accessing their own property, they have a right of free traversal in such situations. It always makes for heated discussions in the countryside when farmers get to cross each other's fields and meadows.
 

Trace

Banned
Selective sympathy eh?

Situations change. If someone was doing this to Trump tower or something I'd be cheering them on. To a homeless shelter? Not so much.

Living on a private street in the Presidio is not something I have sympathy for.

Globally not everyone who lives on a private street is rich

I can guarantee you everyone living on that street is a multimillionaire. Unless you think mansions in San Fran come cheap.
 

E92 M3

Member
Situations change. If someone was doing this to Trump tower or something I'd be cheering them on. To a homeless shelter? Not so much.

Living on a private street in the Presidio is not something I have sympathy for.



I can guarantee you everyone living on that street is a multimillionaire. Unless you think mansions in San Fran come cheap.

So, if someone is wealthy than they don't deserve sympathy? Not very kind of you.

...yes? I don't have sympathy for child abusers, or murderers, or Trump. Or Rich people living on a private street who do anything to avoid paying taxes.

Why are you bringing up criminals lol? We're talking about law-abiding citizens. These people pay their taxes, otherwise, they would be in jail.
 

Trace

Banned
So, if someone is wealthy than they don't deserve sympathy? Not very kind of you.



Why are you bringing up criminals lol? We're talking about law-abiding citizens. These people pay their taxes, otherwise, they would be in jail.

Why would I have sympathy for rich people being told their street has been bought? It's delicious irony for all the fucking over they do to the rest of the populace.
 

_Ryo_

Member
So, if someone is wealthy than they don't deserve sympathy? Not very kind of you.



Why are you bringing up criminals lol? We're talking about law-abiding citizens. These people pay their taxes, otherwise, they would be in jail.

To demonstrate that sympathy can be selective. I'm not saying they're criminals, nor am I implying they should be in jail.
 

Zoe

Member
Would that be legal ? Over here you can't block someone from accessing their own property, they have a right of free traversal in such situations. It always makes for heated discussions in the countryside when farmers get to cross each other's fields and meadows.

True, there usually are easements.
 

Zoe

Member
I'm pretty sure the property owners didn't receive a letter saying 'if you don't pay $14 a year, the street goes bye bye'

And they really didn't:

In a letter to the city last month, Scott Emblidge, the attorney for the Presidio Homeowners Association, said the group had failed to pay up because its tax bill was being mailed to the Kearny Street address used by an accountant who hadn’t worked for the homeowners since the 1980s.
 
Would that be legal ? Over here you can't block someone from accessing their own property, they have a right of free traversal in such situations. It always makes for heated discussions in the countryside when farmers get to cross each other's fields and meadows.

That's called an easement, and it may be in play here as well. I don't know anything about California law, nor do I know much about real property law, but it's certainly possible the homeowners could get a court to enforce an easement on this street if the new street owner attempts to block them from using the street.
 

Az

Member
For some reason I don't get joy out of this like some of you. Yes those ppl are rich but I dont know them or how they got there.

Im not bothered by it either. Its whatever
 

liquidtmd

Banned
'They are rich therefore deserve feck all sympathy' is a bit flawed in that I know some really nice folk who have worked their absolute asses off over the years to get to what would probably qualify as rich.

Financial wealth status should not really disqualify people from empathy any more than financially poor people
 

Balphon

Member
I'm left wondering what notice the City/County actually attempted. All the article has is the Treasurer's office quoted as saying "well we sent the bills" along with the hilarious CYA response of "we did what the law required."

I can't imagine the notice was actually legally sufficient if it didn't involve some physical posting on the property to be sold, but I don't know CA law.
 

E92 M3

Member
Why would I have sympathy for rich people being told their street has been bought? It's delicious irony for all the fucking over they do to the rest of the populace.

Please tell me how you know which people they fuck over? Do you know every single resident and their family? Do you think poor people don't fuck people over?

You seem misguided.

To demonstrate that sympathy can be selective. I'm not saying they're criminals, nor am I implying they should be in jail.

Yeah, but c'mon, not that selective lol. I was talking within the framework of normal everyday citizens.
 

RedAssedApe

Banned
'They are rich therefore deserve feck all sympathy' is a bit flawed in that I know some really nice folk who have worked their absolute asses off over the years to get to what would probably qualify as rich.

Financial wealth status should not really disqualify people from empathy any more than financially poor people

what about not paying taxes
 
'They are rich therefore deserve feck all sympathy' is a bit flawed in that I know some really nice folk who have worked their absolute asses off over the years to get to what would probably qualify as rich.

Financial wealth status should not really disqualify people from empathy any more than financially poor people

This board really shows it's ass when it comes to stuff like that. I've grown used to it.
 
'They are rich therefore deserve feck all sympathy' is a bit flawed in that I know some really nice folk who have worked their absolute asses off over the years to get to what would probably qualify as rich.

Financial wealth status should not really disqualify people from empathy any more than financially poor people
I agree.
 

Stumpokapow

listen to the mad man
I'm pretty sure the property owners didn't receive a letter saying 'if you don't pay $14 a year, the street goes bye bye'

They did, it just went to their chartered accountant, whose address they didn't update properly. Gee whiz officer, I forgot to renew my license! Shucks, what do you mean I'm not allowed to drive my car?
 
'They are rich therefore deserve feck all sympathy' is a bit flawed in that I know some really nice folk who have worked their absolute asses off over the years to get to what would probably qualify as rich.

Financial wealth status should not really disqualify people from empathy any more than financially poor people
Where I am on this, as the son of two parents who worked (still work) their fucking asses off for their family and are now the only people in their respective extended families who could be considered upper middle class or rich (not own-a-mansion rich but put-two-children-through-private-school rich)

Edit: Also I doubt that the residents of this street deliberately neglected to pay an annually $14 tax.

There's some humor in it, but I can still see people getting extremely pissed about this stuff and I sympathize.
 

Tain

Member
love stumbling into advantageous positions and accidentally retaining massive amounts of wealth from generation to generation
 

Briarios

Member
So, if someone is wealthy than they don't deserve sympathy? Not very kind of you.



Why are you bringing up criminals lol? We're talking about law-abiding citizens. These people pay their taxes, otherwise, they would be in jail.

Actually, they didn't pay their taxes, which is why their street was sold ...
 
Top Bottom