Mariah Carey
Member
From what I've heard the script to this is really, really weird.
Mariah Carey said:From what I've heard the script to this is really, really weird.
You shut your filthy whore mouth. Kingdom of Heaven DC is Scotts best film since Alien.Blader5489 said:Kingdom of Heaven is great, but severely crippled by Orlando Bloom's character (as far as acting goes, I thought he was fine). I think it's fair to criticize Scott with that film.
Pctx said:You shut your filthy whore mouth. Kingdom of Heaven DC is Scotts best film since Alien.
Blader5489 said:That was a fake.
Pctx said:You shut your filthy whore mouth. Kingdom of Heaven DC is Scotts best film since Alien.
Pctx said:You shut your filthy whore mouth. Kingdom of Heaven DC is Scotts best film since Alien.
Vinci said:Yeah, I'm not altogether sure I cared about the Space Jockey.
Two? Really?.la1n said:Ridley Scott has made two good movies as far as i'm concerned and really I didn't even like Alien half as much as the cameron helmed sequel Aliens. Really don't have much faith in this but would like to be proved wrong.
Staccat0 said:I'd rather have Alien 5 directed by Alfonso Cauron (or whoever) over a prequel with a long established director at the helm.
What!?! Ridley has made two of the best scifi movies ever in Alien and Bladerunner. Is last couple of movies haven't been great, but they have been good..la1n said:Ridley Scott has made two good movies as far as i'm concerned and really I didn't even like Alien half as much as the cameron helmed sequel Aliens. Really don't have much faith in this but would like to be proved wrong.
I'm not sure. I was being hypothetical. I'd love someone great but current to take a stab at it. The series has had 4 amazing directors all with very different styles have a turn. I say keep the train rollingBlader5489 said:Wasn't the proposed Alien 5 going to be helmed by Scott and Cameron?
Discotheque said:It's one of his best films ever. But I think it's about on par with Gladiator and Matchstick Men.
And below Alien/Blade Runner.
Blade Runner is in my Top 10 movies of all time. In terms of Scott's directing of it, it was near brilliant, but being the huge Alien buff, Alien wins out (for me) again on so many levels of genius. Again, that's my taste. I know a lot of movie guru's out there like to argue the finer points of BR, but again--- Alien--- Scott does such a brilliant job of capturing our most primal fear that you just don't get that same sense in BR.BravoSuperStar said:You mean since Blade Runner, right?
pringles said:Two? Really?
Alien
Gladiator
Kingdom of Heaven DC
American Gangster
Black Hawk Down
Matchstick Men
Body Of Lies
Blade Runner
So atleast 6 of those movies are bad according to you?
pringles said:Two? Really?
Alien
Gladiator
Kingdom of Heaven DC
American Gangster
Black Hawk Down
Matchstick Men
Body Of Lies
Blade Runner
So atleast 6 of those movies are bad according to you?
Yeah, it was fossilized into the chair. That takes longer than 30 years. So the interview in the OP confused me, unless someone else found the alien and will investigate its history or something.C4Lukins said:I doubt that the Space Jockey is going to be a major part of the film. I think it is going to be about humans making first contact with an alien vessel, which is that craft that has crashed on the planet at the beginning of Alien. They are either going to arrive on the craft after the space jockeys are all dead or during their conflict with the Aliens, but while it is still in space. The conflict that follows will lead to the craft crashing on the planet in the end. Although I do seem to recall that Alien implied that the craft had been there for hundreds or thousands of years, so we may not actually see a space jockey in action, unless it is in some sort of flashback or intro to the film. They may explain a bit about the Space Jockey's but the film will not center on their conflict with the aliens.
Ridley Scott like Spielberg and Scorsese talk allot of shit what about they have planned :lolDead said:http://www.collider.com/2010/04/23/ridley-scott-confirms-alien-prequel-will-be-shot-in-3d/
Ridley confirms that he's shooting in 3D
He also says he is planning TWO Alien prequels, though who knows if he will go beyond the first one
shintoki said:Ridley Scott like Spielberg and Scorsese talk allot of shit what about they have planned :lol
Well, from the look of things, it seems like Robin Hood is a total sham, I have a feeling he has gotten bored of that type of movie, so hopefully he does make more of a move back into Sci-Fi beyond this Alien prequel.Scullibundo said:I'm most excited for this because it might ween him back into sci-fi and closer to finally shooting The Forever War.
Same here.Scullibundo said:I'm most excited for this because it might ween him back into sci-fi and closer to finally shooting The Forever War.
Director Sir Ridley Scott has revealed that his 3D Alien prequel will be "really nasty" and will respond to the standard set by James Cameron's Avatar.
Speaking to Screen Daily, the film-maker said the movie, set in 2085, would be "the dark side of the moon".
Sir Ridley, who directed the original Alien film in 1979, paid tribute to Cameron's technological innovation.
"Jim's raised the bar and I've got to jump to it," said the 72-year-old. "He's not going to get away with it."
Speaking about the Alien prequel, which is set five years before the original, the British film-maker said it is about "gods and engineers... engineers of space".
"And were the aliens designed as a form of biological warfare? Or biology that would actually go in and clean up a planet?"
"It will take place in the years before that, when they first come across this thing on a planet called Zeta Reticuli, he added.
"And it will ask who was that guy in the first film lying in a chair with his chest blown outwards when they first go into the giant spacecraft."
Gallbaro said:I would rather have another Alien be a horror flick rather than a action flick.
Scullibundo said:Scott isn't usually one for CG, so that is what I expect.
Solo said:If hes trying to outdo Avatar, I dont expect anything but CG to be honest.
Scullibundo said:HYPE HYPE HYPE HYPE HYPE HYPE HYPE HYPE HYPE HYPE HYPE
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/8644051.stm
This film is sounding better and better.
Blader5489 said:Wait, is the movie set 30 years before Alien or 5 years?
Scullibundo said:I expect a blend in terms of characters and minimal CG when it comes to environment. I'm expecting some grand sets that he'll shoot in native 3D.
jett said:Alien takes place, apparently, in the year 2122...so uh it has to be 40 years before, not 5. The writer of the article made a mistake I guess.
Fun fact: the Zeta Reticuli system is 39 light years away from the Earth IRL...that's quite the technology jump Ridley is expecting.
It's not thaaaat unfeasable really, assuming we'd be able to traverse 39 light years in 40 years (so rather close to the speed of light) then we'd have invent the technology capable of this by 2082 or something - or the technology to go half the speed of light by 2042.jett said:Alien takes place, apparently, in the year 2122...so uh it has to be 40 years before, not 5. The writer of the article made a mistake I guess.
Fun fact: the Zeta Reticuli system is 39 light years away from the Earth IRL...that's quite the technology jump Ridley is expecting.