It’s absolutely disgusting for women to be sexually harassed in the workplace, and every effort should be made to stop it.
Characters and storylines in video games should never be used to push a political agenda first. It’s an Incredibly stupid thing to do.
Both of these statements are true, and if you don’t realise that, you really are part of the problem.
We must first clearly, unambiguously define sexual harassment. It seems to me the definition has changed considerably over past years, and always in the same ever expanding direction, as part of the never ending war on language.
Is leering, which is mentioned in the article, sexual harassment? Really? Under what circumstances? Is asking a colleague out sexual harassment? Really? Under what circumstances? Is complementing a colleague on her looks sexual harassment? Really? Under what circumstances. Is a light touch on the shoulder sexual harassment? Really? Under what circumstances?
In the context of this discussion, sexism is the belief women ae inherently inferior to men. What action or omission by Rocksteady betrays such belief? Likewise, misogyny is disdain and hatred for women in general. What statement or action by Rocksteady betrays that attitude towards women?
It's always possible the article is deliberately omitting sensitive but crucial details. But none of the behaviours ascribed to Rocksteady management so far remotely qualify as sexist or misogynistic.
Developers have the right to use characters and, more broadly, their games to push any political or ideological agenda. However, they should be aware that people who disagree with the agenda in question will probably pass on the game.
It goes both ways.