Federer should retire at this point.
No. Nadal's eight Roland Garros was solidified yesterday with the defeat of Donal Young.Djokovic's path is clear now, 100% guaranteed to win RG.
Federer should retire at this point.
If he loses the US Open he will definitely retire. But I can't see him going without at least attempting to get 14.
Federer should just retire already before he ruins his legacy any further.
You know what I mean, Fed is on the massive decline right now where he used to be untouchable. Not just losing to Nadal but more and more players scattered throughout the top 10.
Commentators sound puzzled. Gulbis beating Federer in a slam was NID. Some people need to pay the fuck attention.
Tsonga and Raonic will be both tough. And a good Berdych/Gulbis in the semifinals will also be tough.Djokovic's path is clear now, 100% guaranteed to win RG.
I officially don't care if Novak wins today. 1) Because Federer is gone (Lord knows I don't like him, lol) and Gulbis is back in the QFs. Like I said before, I don't expect Novak to win RG anyway. People really underestimate Nadal here.
But people underestimate Gulbis. He's unpredictable and it a supreme talent. People call him a ball basher, and yet had Federer scrambling to unsuccessfully get those drop shots. He has finesse AND power.
Gulbis will further cement his legacy here.![]()
Same old talk every time. Fed will retire when he choses to. Losing to an inform Gulbis in 5 set is not such a shame that he should retire because of it.
Love Gulbis' attitude, must've been what tennis players were like in the 80's (McEnroe, Lendl, Connors) and not just go flaccid when it counts.
That's actually a GREAT day.Jesus, this day turned from potentially awesome to absolute shit.
Fed's match was crap.
Tsonga is playing like shit.
Goddamn.
That's actually a GREAT day.
People have been saying this for years. That's just from the first 8 pages or so of the general tennis thread searching for "retire." After these posts he won four slams, so who knows what could happen.