• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Roman Polanski denied chance to close US rape case

Status
Not open for further replies.

Fevaweva

Member
I'm trying to figure out the point in saying shit like oh he's still a great director and deserves awards and shit.. like no fuck you, no he doesn't

It is called separating the art from the artist. Like I have said, Polanski being a child molester in the 70s doesn't make Chinatown, The Pianist or Carnage (for example) bad films nor does it diminish his skill as a director
 
But he is a great director, and the Pianist is a fantastic film. Just because Polanski is a an awful human being...it doesn't, objectively speaking, diminish the quality of the direction in The Pianist.
That's true but it also doesn't mean the academy should publicly acknowledge it. Rape culture right here in this post folks. Never saw his movie but I'm sure it's well done. Guy is a piece of shit and his work, no matter how "great" it is should not be acknowledged by society.
 
If you're good enough to be hired for the job, then you should be hired for the job regardless of criminal past. As long as you've shown no sides of repeating those mistakes, obviously, as to not jeopardize whatever business I am hiring you for.

The Polanski case is a bit different though. If he had gone to jail and rehabilitated himself and the like, I would have no problem hiring him to direct my movie. Not sure how I would react to the Polanski situation, though.
Rapist apologist. Wonder what your thoughts on this would be if it was a family member of yours (or you) as the victim and you saw society rewarding a man that is a know widely to be a sexually violent criminal.
 

Wiktor

Member
It's sad that Polanski gets a free pass in Hollywood but Mel is blacklisted for life for saying some stupig things in drunken stupor.

Anyway, the case will end only when he dies. He will never come back to USA and US courts will never be able to force other countries to extradite him.
 

Wiktor

Member
Rapist apologist. Wonder what your thoughts on this would be if it was a family member of yours (or you) as the victim and you saw society rewarding a man that is a know widely to be a sexually violent criminal.

You think that nobody should hire a rapist who, unlike Polanski, did his time?
Also..I get your victim argument, but this is the rare case where it doesn't work, because the victim not only has forgiven him, but also made a request to the american prosecutors to drop the case.
 

Lethe82

Banned
I'm trying to figure out the point in saying shit like oh he's still a great director and deserves awards and shit.. like no fuck you, no he doesn't

Separating the art from the artist, but awards given to him after the fact are still kind of gross, though many people worked on those films, so credit where it is due still (by that I mean I'd have less problems with a film he has made winning for something other than best director etc).
 

Lethe82

Banned
It's sad that Polanski gets a free pass in Hollywood but Mel is blacklisted for life for saying some stupig things in drunken stupor.

People were willing to give him a pass on that, frankly (forgive don't forget kind of thing), when those audio tapes came out of him repeating the same kind of language and threatening to kill his with and child or w/e he was done.

That's true but it also doesn't mean the academy should publicly acknowledge it. Rape culture right here in this post folks. Never saw his movie but I'm sure it's well done. Guy is a piece of shit and his work, no matter how "great" it is should not be acknowledged by society.

That's not rape culture, that's an objective statement. The issue you're rallying against however is that people in positions of power can use that power to get away with some pretty heinous things which also includes things that fall under rape culture. People let people get away with tons of things if they have the power to leverage, murder, theft, extortion...
 

StayDead

Member
This might be an odd question, but what do his victims think about the whole situation? They're the most important people here and if for some reason they've got over the hell they must've gone through and decide that nothing should be done, would people support that? I'm sorry if this sounds like a stupid question but I know very little about this case or the victims. If they still want him to stand trial and rightfully so it should happen though.
 

obin_gam

Member
This might be an odd question, but what do his victims think about the whole situation? They're the most important people here and if for some reason they've got over the hell they must've gone through and decide that nothing should be done, would people support that? I'm sorry if this sounds like a stupid question but I know very little about this case or the victims. If they still want him to stand trial and rightfully so it should happen though.
It's victim as in singular. And she think's people should just let it go: http://www.theguardian.com/film/2013/sep/18/samantha-geimer-roman-polanski-unlawful-sex-email

Over the decades, she has seen public response to her own story change with the times. "You'll notice the culture has shifted so that everything has swung the other way and now it's Roman the Monster. And then it was my mum and I the monsters." They were called liars and gold-diggers. Gore Vidal called her a hooker. "It was terrible and unwarranted, but not shocking. Well, some of it was shocking." It was also a long time ago. Polanski should be allowed to resolve his legal issues and come back to the US, she says. "Because that's what would be fair. Because it's the right thing." And her? She smiles. "I'm fine."
 

Joni

Member
the Academy Award-winner had even less right to the procedural hearing than he did when he fled justice 37 years ago.
Wait, what? Why wouldn't he have had the right to that 37 years ago?
 

Drek

Member
Wait, what? Why wouldn't he have had the right to that 37 years ago?

Because he had a trial and plead guilty. Most people don't get to have a trial, plead guilty, then reboot the entire process because they're worried how they pleaded originally would result in jail time.

The fact of the matter is that he drugged and raped a 13 year old. In 1977 he was allowed to plead that down to statutory rape, implying that the drugged 13 year old was a willing participant, just too young to give legal consent. He was too chickenshit to risk even a minute in jail, so he used his celebrity and wealth to flee the country.

If he was any random dude who pulled the same thing France would have extradited him as he walked off the plane. Because he makes snooty ass films they worship his feces and have shielded him for 37 years.

The U.S. should drop a drone on his house in France and be done with it. The entire French government is guilty of aiding and abetting a fugitive, so they're just asking for the collateral damage.
 

Zeus Molecules

illegal immigrants are stealing our air
It's sad that Polanski gets a free pass in Hollywood but Mel is blacklisted for life for saying some stupig things in drunken stupor.

Anyway, the case will end only when he dies. He will never come back to USA and US courts will never be able to force other countries to extradite him.

thats not 100% true. He is still making lower budget movies and slowly the studios are trying to sneak him into behind the scene roles on bigger budget movies. With all that said there are signs that that is how Mel actually feels and not just a drunken stupor.
 
thats not 100% true. He is still making lower budget movies and slowly the studios are trying to sneak him into behind the scene roles on bigger budget movies. With all that said there are signs that that is how Mel actually feels and not just a drunken stupor.

I'd take the drunken (maybe actual) thoughts someone has, over somebody actually raping someone.
 
Because he had a trial and plead guilty. Most people don't get to have a trial, plead guilty, then reboot the entire process because they're worried how they pleaded originally would result in jail time.

The fact of the matter is that he drugged and raped a 13 year old. In 1977 he was allowed to plead that down to statutory rape, implying that the drugged 13 year old was a willing participant, just too young to give legal consent. He was too chickenshit to risk even a minute in jail, so he used his celebrity and wealth to flee the country.

If he was any random dude who pulled the same thing France would have extradited him as he walked off the plane. Because he makes snooty ass films they worship his feces and have shielded him for 37 years.

The U.S. should drop a drone on his house in France and be done with it. The entire French government is guilty of aiding and abetting a fugitive, so they're just asking for the collateral damage.

I know it's hard to understand for some Americans but there are things called borders, due process and sovereignty.
 

Lethe82

Banned
This guy is still making movies while Hollywood shunned Mel Gibson.

Why?

Mel Gibson had multiple fuck ups beyond just the antisemitism (which is obviously hugely damaging in Hollywood) including threatening to basically murder his ex wife and let me tell you, the audio tapes of those conversations with his ex wife are ugly.Also Polanski fled the country and basically found enough people to continue to do what he does, so people had to live with it. It's MUCH easier to blacklist an actor than a Director that still has many friends in high places. That and the Mel Gibson thing is still very fresh in comparison.
 

onken

Member
I agree that Polanski had a fucked up life with his mother dying in a concentration camp and with poor Sharon Tate being killed by the Manson family along with her and Roman's unborn child. However, even though I'm sympathetic for how tragic his life has been, those dark events do not make him unaccountable for his crimes. The man drugged and raped a thirteen year old girl. I hate that the director of my favorite film (Chinatown) committed such a monstrous crime. but he still did it and should pay for it.

Totally agree with all of this.
 

Joni

Member
Because he had a trial and plead guilty. Most people don't get to have a trial, plead guilty, then reboot the entire process because they're worried how they pleaded originally would result in jail time.
I thought you still got a trial if you plead guilty, just a shorter one.
Also, isn't that what a sentence bargain does? You do a plea bargain based on the sentence.
 

Drek

Member
I know it's hard to understand for some Americans but there are things called borders, due process and sovereignty.

There is also a thing called extradition treaties. The U.S. and France have one. France doesn't honor it. Breaking deals specifically pertaining to your sovereign borders tends to make people not give a shit about the "due process" part.

Again, the French government are aiding and abetting a U.S. fugitive, in direct violation of their own laws and agreements with the United States.

People suspect Iraq of having WMDs with literally zero proof, just a lot of truthy feels in their guts - tens of thousands of soldiers, billions of dollars, and the lives of hundreds of thousands of civilians are offered up against this insult to the international community.

France obviously violates an international treaty to shield a self-confessed rapist - shoulders are shrugged and excuses are made.

White privilege I guess?

I thought you still got a trial if you plead guilty, just a shorter one.
Also, isn't that what a sentence bargain does? You do a plea bargain based on the sentence.

He needed to show up for sentencing, that was the last part to be processed. They let him plea down to lesser charges that would have had far less jail time associated than real rape. He still bailed because there was still some potential he'd see some time in jail.

He had 90% of his trial and bailed on the last 10% because even though he was handed a pro-rape culture + Hollywood celebrity sweetheart deal he wasn't willing to face a minute of real imprisonment. Because he's a piece of shit.
 
I'm trying to figure out the point in saying shit like oh he's still a great director and deserves awards and shit.. like no fuck you, no he doesn't

He's a fucking scumbag who deserves his sentence but his work is amazing. His rendition of Macbeth is one of the best renditions of a Shakespearean play ever.

Just because someone is a piece of shit, doesn't remove any merit from their artistic work and achievements.
 

Joni

Member
There is also a thing called extradition treaties. The U.S. and France have one. France doesn't honor it. Breaking deals specifically pertaining to your sovereign borders tends to make people not give a shit about the "due process" part.

Again, the French government are aiding and abetting a U.S. fugitive, in direct violation of their own laws and agreements with the United States.
Polanski is a French citizen. France doesn't extradite its own citizens.

He needed to show up for sentencing, that was the last part to be processed. They let him plea down to lesser charges that would have had far less jail time associated than real rape. He still bailed because there was still some potential he'd see some time in jail.
Still strange the judge thinks he didn't deserve a hearing in that case.
 

Currygan

at last, for christ's sake
I agree that Polanski had a fucked up life with his mother dying in a concentration camp and with poor Sharon Tate being killed by the Manson family along with her and Roman's unborn child. However, even though I'm sympathetic for how tragic his life has been, those dark events do not make him unaccountable for his crimes. The man drugged and raped a thirteen year old girl. I hate that the director of my favorite film (Chinatown) committed such a monstrous crime. but he still did it and should pay for it.

a level headed post, for once. excellent, agree 100%
 
A sad occurrence all around, and to think that if he had just not raped the girl he would've probably had the chance to make a number of movies equally impressive to his current best.
 
I find it difficult to separate the art from the artist when what the artist did was so despicable.

Like, I've been going through old pay-per-views on the WWE Network, and I can't watch matches with Chris Benoit in them anymore. It's uncomfortable. Every time he does something, it has this sinister undertone to it now.

Watching Polanski's films would probably have the same effect on me. I'd probably subconsciously try to connect every little thing in those films to the motivations of child rape.
 
I find it difficult to separate the art from the artist when what the artist did was so despicable.

Like, I've been going through old pay-per-views on the WWE Network, and I can't watch matches with Chris Benoit in them anymore. It's uncomfortable. Every time he does something, it has this sinister undertone to it now.

Watching Polanski's films would probably have the same effect on me. I'd probably subconsciously try to connect every little thing in those films to the motivations of child rape.

There are schools of criticism that go the opposite way. It may be worth a read: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_the_Author
 
The title says that Polanski himself denied the chance to close his own rape case. It should read "Polanski was denied".

Anyways, I am not surprised.
 
If the art was really separated from the artist, the awards would be called things like "best movie" not "best director".

Céline was both a genius and an asshole. At some moments he behaved like a genius and, some other moments, he was a piece of shit. I think the same can be said for Polanski and many other controversial artists.

I'm not sure you can say that any one part of their personality had an effect on the other, but in my opinion, you cannot ignore one part when forming a honest opinion on those people. People are complex beings. You've got to accept the fact that they did the best and the worst alike.

Now, should Polanski never receive any award? I don't think it's worth a philosophical debate. Just let the heads of the Academy decide, based on the official goals and statuses of the institution. Let them sort it out.

The title says that Polanski himself denied the chance to close his own rape case. It should read "Polanski was denied".

Anyways, I am not surprised.

Auxiliary verbs are frequently dropped from news headlines.
 
Two girls? I thought it was one.

There's an interesting documentary about all this, Roman Polanski: Wanted and Desired (2008).

Yes, people in this topic should watch it if they haven't.

Polanski is a piece of shit but this would've been resolved decades ago if the judge wasn't spotlight loving a media whore. The woman he raped has wanted this over and done with for a long time now because she's sick of being repeatedly dragged back into it.
 
Polanski should go to prison for the equal amount of years that he has been on the run
This guy is still making movies while Hollywood shunned Mel Gibson.

Why?

I know, instead of addressing Mel's emotional problems and state of his mental sanity. Hollywood fluffy people just through him on the curb like trash.
Has Mel said stupid remarks, fuck yeah. But he is not right in the head and needed help instead of being ostracized
 

Pelydr

mediocrity at its best
This might be an odd question, but what do his victims think about the whole situation? They're the most important people here and if for some reason they've got over the hell they must've gone through and decide that nothing should be done, would people support that? I'm sorry if this sounds like a stupid question but I know very little about this case or the victims. If they still want him to stand trial and rightfully so it should happen though.

Victims get over serious trauma so they can move on and have an actual life. It has nothing to do with a rapist actually being responsible for the crime.
 
Victims get over serious trauma so they can move on and have an actual life. It has nothing to do with a rapist actually being responsible for the crime.
not all victims, lots of them suffer through PTSD through out their adult lives. Some develop other disorders.

a rape victim does not "get over it"" like a mugging victim can
 

entremet

Member
Mel Gibson had multiple fuck ups beyond just the antisemitism (which is obviously hugely damaging in Hollywood) including threatening to basically murder his ex wife and let me tell you, the audio tapes of those conversations with his ex wife are ugly.Also Polanski fled the country and basically found enough people to continue to do what he does, so people had to live with it. It's MUCH easier to blacklist an actor than a Director that still has many friends in high places. That and the Mel Gibson thing is still very fresh in comparison.

I listened to those tapes. He was obviously drunk. Not to defend what he said. She was also not his wife. They were never married. They did have a child together.

Hollywood is just that type of town. When you're shunned. You're shunned for good.
 

Hero

Member
Polanski should be denied pretty much everything for the rest of his life.

Not that I think the guy deserves a second chance after fleeing for all these years but I don't think he some kind of monster. The dudes pregnant wife was killed by the Manson family a few years earlier so I'm sure that messed him up. Just a terrible situation all around.

The fuck?
 
He will never get brought to justice at this rate. Scum. No matter who you are you should face your crime and he should do the honourable thing.

I am glad the US court system didn't budge
 

Wazzy

Banned
It's victim as in singular. And she think's people should just let it go: http://www.theguardian.com/film/2013/sep/18/samantha-geimer-roman-polanski-unlawful-sex-email

Over the decades, she has seen public response to her own story change with the times. "You'll notice the culture has shifted so that everything has swung the other way and now it's Roman the Monster. And then it was my mum and I the monsters." They were called liars and gold-diggers. Gore Vidal called her a hooker. "It was terrible and unwarranted, but not shocking. Well, some of it was shocking." It was also a long time ago. Polanski should be allowed to resolve his legal issues and come back to the US, she says. "Because that's what would be fair. Because it's the right thing." And her? She smiles. "I'm fine."
If you were publicly attacked and shamed by Hollywood for being raped, you might say something like this too.
 

Pelydr

mediocrity at its best
not all victims, lots of them suffer through PTSD through out their adult lives. Some develop other disorders.

a rape victim does not "get over it"" like a mugging victim can

Oh I know. Just responding to horrible post saying because a victim may have moved on so should the courts.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom