cartoon_soldier
Member
Ferrio said:He gives that speech often.
:lol
Ferrio said:He gives that speech often.
its a mineral that takes 12 years and giant truck loads of money to bring back to Earth. Unobtanium is a good name for it.Tobor said:Is that supposed to help an argument? At least Roddenberry took the time to make up a name. Sounds like Cameron forgot to use search/replace.
Combine said:Expensive and rare on earth, not on Pandora.
maharg said:I think you might be underestimating the penetrative power ofarrows and overestimating how strong glass can be made. Bullets have pretty weak penetrative power, but the amount of kinetic energy in a flying arrow is massive, and the penetrative power of arrows is much higher because of the sharp tip. Especially when those arrows are twice the size of human arrows and drawn by much stronger people.
Yeah yeah, 200 years in the future, but if the humans could make an impenetrable seethrough material that's lightweight and thin I'd expect them to be using it for more things than cockpit windows. Fences, larger windows on the big gunship, etc.
Also note that when they were firing up at the gunships earlier in the movie: that's the worst possible scenario for arrows. At the height of their arc they'd have the least energy.
How do you know how much that lump is worth? He doesn't say 'this piece', he talks about it in weight, do you know the weight of that sample?OuterWorldVoice said:If Unobtanium is so expensive and so rare, how come he has a small nation's worth floating on a desk ornament in his unsecured office?
Because they're on the planet where it's being mined, making it - in that location - somewhat less rare.OuterWorldVoice said:If Unobtanium is so expensive and so rare, how come he has a small nation's worth floating on a desk ornament in his unsecured office?
And go where, to do what with it? It's a six-year journey back home. I suspect employee's personal belongings are inspected at some point along the way.OuterWorldVoice said:The point remains, any employee could wander in and pocket tens of millions of dollars. Diamonds aren't rare in African mines, but they don't leave them lying around either.
yeah, those Transformers battles sure were comprehensible compared to Avatar.JzeroT1437 said:I see a lot of films in a month--eight this week alone--and Avatar is without a doubt the most boring, clumsy film I've seen in a while. The first hour and a half is spent slowly developing Pandora, while Jake provides background narration as exposition for anything Cameron couldn't find time to show or didn't trust his audience to figure out, entire minutes are wasted on shots of the wilderness and wildlife, which though beautifully rendered, belong in an artbook rather than the film, and the plot is a complete joke.Retarded.Evil corporate and military men seek to usurp an indigenous people in order to attain their "Unobtainium".
The last hour is spent on huge, Michael-Bay-esque explosions and incomprehensible battle sequences. It's nothing but a display of graphical advancement--which it excels at--but a five minute tech demo for studios would've served just as well as this 2.7 hour mess. The only people I can imagine liking this are potheads who got high before watching it and possibly people who have never seen an action movie in their life.
Tobor said:These are fair points. I concede this one. Besides, if it didn't work, they'd have nothing left. I'm just happy that Cameron resisted the urge to have the Navi build Ewok traps. I figured that was a given.
stuburns said:How do you know how much that lump is worth? He doesn't say 'this piece', he talks about it in weight, do you know the weight of that sample?
The real reason is it's bad ass.
DanielPlainview said:yeah, those Transformers battles sure were comprehensible compared to Avatar.
:lol
I think it is just showing how weird evolution can develop things. After all, what the heck is a platypus good for and yet there it is?DanielPlainview said::lol I thought this too. It must suck for them to fly around everywhere like that.
What is the stiff competition exactly? The Hurt Locker? Bastards? This is like the worst year for films imaginable.jey_16 said:Best picture? Best actress? :lol Alright guys, maybe a bit too much off the kool-aid
How do you know it's a metal? The name is not the 'real' name of the material in the Avatar world. How do you know that piece isn't hollow? How do you know an alien metal wouldn't be considerably lower in density? How do you know what state earth is economically to state if '20 million a kilo' is even a lot?OuterWorldVoice said:A kilo. And he means an Earth kilo. It's a metal ("ium") and even if it's a very low density metal, like sodium (0.968 g·cm−3) or another alkali metal, then that's a LOT of it. At least at the stated price.
maharg said:Yes, Ewok traps would have been pretty terrible.
To the unobtainium (I'm on the side of finding that a ridiculously stupid name, for reference): I doubt you'd have found anyone more covered in furs and gold in colonial days than the governor of a colony.
Heh.Tobor said:These are fair points. I concede this one. Besides, if it didn't work, they'd have nothing left. I'm just happy that Cameron resisted the urge to have the Navi build Ewok traps. I figured that was a given.
CassidyIzABeast said:its a mineral that takes 12 years and giant truck loads of money to bring back to Earth. Unobtanium is a good name for it.
stuburns said:What is the stiff competition exactly? The Hurt Locker? Bastards? This is like the worst year for films imaginable.
You're gonna praise TF2 and diss Avatar? On GAF? Good luck with that...:lolJzeroT1437 said:You're right. They were rich and meaningful.My point wasn't that the battle scenes were particularly incomprehensible--it's that I didn't give a shit about them because they failed to develop the characters outside of vague cliches and stereotypes.I especially liked how the guy playing Quatrich looked like he shit his pants after getting two arrows through the midsection. I know that's the face I would make with two bolts sticking out my chest.
And the action was clumsy. Surprisingly clumsy for Cameron. Go back and watch T2 then tell me this is good Cameron action. This was ass modeled on LoTR war scenes.
Tesseract said:agreed.
cameron kept it simple, solid, and out of reach. it works.
this place reeks of wankery.
:lolJzeroT1437 said:This was awful on so many levels. Explicit exposition. Wasted scenes on the surroundings. Cheesy dialogue. A childishly basic plot.
Seriously. This is throwing movies into the ever-popular graphics vs gameplay argument. All it served as was a grandiose excuse for visual luxuriation.
TacticalFox88 said:You're gonna praise TF2 and diss Avatar? On GAF? Good luck with that...:lol
JzeroT1437 said:This was awful on so many levels. Explicit exposition. Wasted scenes on the surroundings. Cheesy dialogue. A childishly basic plot.
Seriously. This is throwing movies into the ever-popular graphics vs gameplay argument. All it served as was a grandiose excuse for visual luxuriation.
PrivateWHudson said:The Book of Eli was LOUD and awesome. I wish the feature presentation was as loud.
Hasphat6462 said:It's a visual medium. The storytelling is IN the moving images, ever thought about that?
tino said:The book of Eli trailer was dumb as hell. It reminded me of every sub-standard western done by A-list actor when they have the window to do a quick actioner. (Last Man Standing, 3:10 to Yoma etc etc)
I know Gary Whitta is reading this thread, but that was just a dumb trailer. The chick didn't even look dirty. Everybody else in that trailer looked post-apocalyptic and that girl looked like she had a two-hour makeup session.
Hasphat6462 said:It's a visual medium. The storytelling is IN the moving images, ever thought about that?
JzeroT1437 said:There was no story though. That's the thing--the story was total garbage.
JzeroT1437 said:There was no story though. That's the thing--the story was total garbage.
OuterWorldVoice said:They should have got the writers from Transformers 2.
and how awesome it was.JzeroT1437 said:This was awful on so many levels. Explicit exposition. Wasted scenes on the surroundings. Cheesy dialogue. A childishly basic plot.
Seriously. This is throwing movies into the ever-popular graphics vs gameplay argument. All it served as was a grandiose excuse for visual luxuriation.
Do you think the Na'vi named the planet Pandora? If the humans named the planet, why can't they name the ore Unobtainium. Honestly, are we nitpicking the names of fantasy ore found on fantasy planets? Relax guys....OuterWorldVoice said:Nah, it was weird and popped a lot of folk OUT of the movie for a few seconds. Of all the complaints I've seen about the film, this is the most objectively reasonable one. I loved the film, btw, but that name just grated.
Hasphat6462 said:How was the story garbage? A tired premise doesn't equate to a bad story.
man, avatar gets WAY too much shit for its story:lolJzeroT1437 said:There was no story though. That's the thing--the story was total garbage.
This is what is so strange about Cameron, he's been quite open about his writing skills, and yet seems to want to write everything he makes. I think his scenario work is okay, he should farm out the rest though.Tobor said:The storytelling is in the script. The visual images help tell the story as written. And Cameron needs to hire some screenwriters.
Tobor said:No way, those guys suck. He should have hired the writers from Star Trek.
Were you alive in 2008? It was much worse.stuburns said:What is the stiff competition exactly? The Hurt Locker? Bastards? This is like the worst year for films imaginable.
How do you know it's a metal? The name is not the 'real' name of the material in the Avatar world. How do you know that piece isn't hollow? How do you know an alien metal wouldn't be considerably lower in density? How do you know what state earth is economically to state if '20 million a kilo' is even a lot?
The truth is, you can think it's stupid, but Cameron could easily have a perfectly logical explanation. It's just not given.
:lolTobor said:No way, those guys suck. He should have hired the writers from Star Trek.
Napoleonthechimp said:Yeah but... that aspect of it lost me.animals can interact with plants and trees too
OuterWorldVoice said:They should have got the writers from Transformers 2.
ryutaro's mama said:Do you think the Na'vi named the planet Pandora? If the humans named the planet, why can't they name the ore Unobtainium. Honestly, are we nitpicking the names of fantasy ore found on fantasy planets? Relax guys....
True, last year was worse, but 07, 06 and 05 were awesome.DanielPlainview said:Were you alive in 2008? It was much worse.
JzeroT1437 said:Lots of huge explosions? Check. Lots of animated things mashing into each other in some excuse for an epic battle?
JzeroT1437 said:I never said Transformers 2 was a better film--I said TERMINATOR 2 was a better film. I just said the ending was riddled with Michael-Bay-Esque traits, which it was. Lots of huge explosions? Check. Lots of animated things mashing into each other in some excuse for an epic battle? Check. Generally lacking feeling of climax? Check.
From your understanding of the written sentence, I'm shocked you could follow the story at all.
How about Newtonium then?OuterWorldVoice said:I'm 100% relaxed. But it's the equivalent of calling their guns "deathrays."
It was clunky. If it weren't, it wouldn't keep popping up in the thread.
As a matter of fact, it reminded me precisely of the guy selling "Deathsticks" in Episode 1. Just a needlessly awkward phrase.
OuterWorldVoice said:Nah, it was weird and popped a lot of folk OUT of the movie for a few seconds. Of all the complaints I've seen about the film, this is the most objectively reasonable one. I loved the film, btw, but that name just grated.
Californium, Eisteinium, shakespeariumryutaro's mama said:How about Newtonium then?