• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Rottenwatch: AVATAR (82%)

Status
Not open for further replies.
icarus-daedelus said:
I admire Scullibundo a lot now for sticking to his guns all the way up to the release. He reminds me of Brimstone - the GAFfer who was strangely obsessed with Miami Vice and Shadowrun :lol - except that Sculli was actually right.
Brimstone was right too!
 
Count Dookkake said:
Who was it who called me out for making the comparison between DS:Wii and Titanic:Avatar?

I wish I was petty enough to remember his name.

Either way...

:lol

You've made this analogy at least 30 times in this thread and I still have no idea what you're trying to say. Guess I fail at the gaming part of GAF :lol
 
Solo said:
You've made this analogy at least 30 times in this thread and I still have no idea what you're trying to say. Guess I fail at the gaming part of GAF :lol

Closer to 5 by my estimate. :P

The gist is this...

It is okay to be surprised by the success of the first one, but it is foolish to be surprised by the success of the second one. It's like people were intentionally ignoring the evidence.
 
JGS said:
I'm going to admit confusion on this one. I'm not sure how an animator can animate a face better than the actual actor can animate their own face.
Because human actors don't have navi facial proportions so it doesn't translate perfectly. With mo-cap, you capture every nuance of the facial expressions and that doesn't make sense when you're talking about putting those animations on a different species. A radical example is putting a horse's running animation on a CGI dog. If you pay attention, it just doesn't work.

Looking at Zoe Saldana/netiry comparison:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CeHsc2ioexs&feature=related

It looks like they were trying to intentionally over-act, maybe to make the facial movements more apparent to the animators when they had to do some touch up? I don't know, but something about the navi faces just doesn't feel right.
 
So I watched it again yesterday with another friend. It was okay, nothing more to add, in fact I was really tired and it was a kinda a late show so I took a short nap in the middle of the movie to skip the love scene. The world's still great though, and I don't think I'll every get tired of the major set pieces in the show. I was pretty surprised that the cinema was like 3/4 full for a 3D screening of a a several week old movie on a weekday evening. It's definitely not common for that to happen around here.
 
Jtwo said:
Pretty much this.
I'm actually very excited for the film though.

It won't bomb by any means but it sure as shit isn't going to make 1.8 billion dollars.

Wow! I don't even remember saying this!
 
You should do a riff on the original "YEEEEESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS" thread title.
 
Ahhh... so many memories.
It's so weird to read that thread now that movie is out.
 
So i watched this today and it was pretty good. except for
nature attacking all the humans and the big wolf thing letting the girl 'bond' with it. Made me roll my eyes


As for the 3D:

For the first half hour it was very uncomfortable on my eyes. dark parts on screen would often turn to splodges of black and unfocused backgrounds were incredibly distracting*


*Should be noted that this is my first 3D film. So it probably isn't related to the directing and cinematography.
 
TacticalFox88 said:
Guys, need a catchy thread title for crow thread. Any ideas? Collecting posts as I type this.

Definitely wait until it's #1, that will be news worthy.

"Titanic sinks again as GAF chews on their crow"
"Avatar: 2 billion dollars worth of crow served"
"Ever wonder what the bottom of an Avatar's shoe looks like? bam!"
"It will never pass $250m" :lol
 
Why not just go with the easiest title to think of. Sculli was right, Always bet on Cameron. The real Avatar discussion of Sculli was right. :lol
 
I watched it again yesterday. Twice in two days. I never do that. Ever.

Avatar is awesome and spectacular in the old-school definitions of the words. I haven't seen a movie that so captivated me since The Fellowship of the Ring, but even that didn't convey the pure sense of wonder that Avatar did. It's clear how much Cameron revels in the idea of Pandora, from each individual plant and animal to the Na'vi culture to the sheer landscape of the place. It's as if he came up with Pandora as its own entity and ended up writing a movie as his way of sharing his planet with the rest of us. At its best, Avatar is a movie about sheer joy; the joy of nature and the joy of discovery. The moments where Jake, our surrogate, gets to see or experience something only Pandora could offer, whether it be the Na'vi coming-of-age rituals, awkward helicopter lizards, retractable plants, or the rainforest at night, are the best parts of the movie, bar none. It's a culmination of Cameron's vivid imagination, his innate sense of direction (ha), and the sheer visual effects talent of Richard Taylor and his Kiwi Krew, and I'd be content just watching these scenes into perpetuity. They're that good.

My inner screenwriter cringed at some of the exposition (Sigourney's "Your brother the eminent biologist who trained three years for this assignment?" was particularly horrendous), but story-wise, I was consistently impressed with the simplicity of it all. For the most part, Cameron paints his story in broad strokes, never getting bogged down with the nitty-gritty details of his world or his characters. That's not to say they aren't there, or that they're meaningless in the context of the film, but only that they're not the focus. We don't need to know the technical details of what Unobtanium actually does, or the geological explanation for why the mountains float, or exactly why Jake's brother was murdered, or what made Giovanni Ribisi such an insufferable prick. They're there if you want to find them, whether they're in the Survival Guide (or whatever it's called) or in the promotional materials or in the umpteen books and guides yet to be released, but they're just not the focus.

It's hard to write simply. As a writer myself, it's incredibly hard to know all this detail about something you're writing and not stuff it all in there just because it's cool. Or because you're trying to cover your bases to make sure everyone understands what you're writing. Or because you feel the need to flesh out every single character in whatever it is you're writing. To pull this story back to just its main themes, to take something that could have been sprawling and plodding and turn it into an 160 minute film that felt like 85, all of this just proves what an expert Cameron is when it comes to this stuff. A great writer can trim the fat off a story, set it aside, and create something compelling without it. A great writer will make you want to seek out more... anything about whatever you just read/watched. That's where all the backstory goes. That's where you put it. And that's what Cameron did. And my god, did he do it well.
 
koam said:
"Avatar: 2 billion dollars worth of crow served"
I like this one a lot.

It made me think "James Cameron: 2,000,000,000 | OT:0"
 
Scullibundo said:
Just booked tickets for the weekend with a friend who hasn't seen it yet. Will be my 5th time.

A buddy wants to see it this weekend that hasn't yet...I really want to, but at the same time 6 times in 3 weeks...fuck it why not :D
 
Am I the only one who didn't think the movie was "amazing?"

I saw it in 3D (which I think is overblown) and yes the CGI is amazing, but everything else about the movie is just ok.

I mean the story was incredibly predictable and nothing new. Yeah the idea of Avatars are cool but not enough to really enthrall me in the story.
 
As far as those posts from those AVATAR threads go, I just read them at the time with amusement. I won't say I knew it would have this kind of success but I knew it wasn't gonna bomb.

I love seeing haters fall flat.

"Bu-bu-bu-but 3D tickets prices are...."

STFU
 
Yes you are the only one. Marvel at your uniqueness. Publish books of your experience so that other sheep who wish to experience an alternate world view might live vicariously through you.

No.
 
Scullibundo said:
Yes you are the only one. Marvel at your uniqueness. Publish books of your experience so that other sheep who wish to experience an alternate world view might live vicariously through you.

No.

Just ask because I have heard nothing but universal praise for this movie and I am wondering If I just didn't get it......
 
CajoleJuice said:
I'm saying that there's no way there wasn't a critical review for the movie back in 1984. It's not accurate.
We have now digressed so far from my initial flippant comment that I think steering it back to the initial point is difficult.

My point being, nothing appeals to everyone, regardless of the level of praise it receives generally. Why are we arguing about such a stupidly obvious statement again?
 
GhaleonEB said:
We have now digressed so far from my initial flippant comment that I think steering it back to the initial point is difficult.

My point being, nothing appeals to everyone, regardless of the level of praise it receives generally. Why are we arguing about such a stupidly obvious statement again?
We just need some more people to quote Ninja Scooter's post and put an :lol under it.
 
CajoleJuice said:
I really don't know how to take this post. :lol

100% serious. I remember reading many negative reviews and synopses in tv listing magazines over the years, decrying the violence, Arnie and allegedly silly concept.
 
I am reading a news from a Chinese forum. The advance ordering is so through to roof in the few IMAX theaters they are considering raise the IMAX price from 150 to 180 RMB.

In one theater the projector malfunctioned and ran audio out of sync. People almost torn the theater manager to pieces.
 
Reading through the old Avatar threads really is quite amusing.

Wes said:
ComingSoon via AICN

Basically, Soderbergh was asked why he believes recent movies aren't impacting the culture as significantly as, say, THE GODFATHER did in 1972. After expressing his disappointment with the absence of "benchmark" movies, he cautioned that AVATAR might be the exception.

His exact quote:
"I've seen some stuff and holy shit. It's the craziest shit ever. That could negate everything I just said."
OuterWorldVoice said:
wat

please don't let scullibundo be redeemed.
So much gold in there.

Some of the early news that trickled out such as:

On her dedication to the role: "‘Avatar’ by far is the most physically strenuous film I’ve ever done,” Saldana, no newbie to the biz, admitted. “A role had never challenged me to the point where it freaked me out and scared me. And ‘Avatar’ definitely did that.” “I really have high hopes for it,” Saldana explained. “Because for two years I gave every bit of me in that part.”

...had me wondering, have any of the principles given interviews since the movie came out? I've seen the interview/media circuit stuff they all did for the premier, but nothing since. It's got to be just incredibly gratifying to see Avatar take off like this.
 
Combine said:
The Survival Guide came in the mail today, and man this thing really is awesome. Amazing all the props they created for this universe, and so many that weren't even seen in the film too. Definitely going to give this a very thorough read.

One thing that stood out to me is that there is an explanation for Earth-Pandora communications:

The book goes on to say how the system uses quantum mechanics to create a "tunneling effect" (sounds similar to the one used in the Half Life universe by the Combine) to pass on the data. I like the small note regarding the cost of sending a transmission, which apparently is $7,500 per bit.
Heh, yeah, when my copy came in the mail, I went to the human tech section and that was the first entry that caught my interest.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom