• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Rottenwatch: AVATAR (82%)

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's one theme of the film: the ignorant dismiss phenomena they don't understand as religious hocus-pocus while the informed are busy tying it down to the physical sciences.
 
icarus-daedelus said:
? I thought Emperor Palpatine was the ruler of the Vatican.

Nope, sorry.

And because of said spider, it´s impossible for the church to forbid Catholic priests from having sex with little boys.

Evlar said:
It's one theme of the film: the ignorant dismiss phenomena they don't understand as religious hocus-pocus while the informed are busy tying it down to the physical sciences.

True.

I´m still convinced that Eywa or someone Creationed the Na´vi.

Could make for some nice "debates" about evolution with Avatar 2/3. Probably with the same guys crying over the poor "Marines" getting killed for violating the rules of the RDA.
 
I was always wondering about the ending, when all the creatures of Pandora helped the Na'vi, if Eywa controlled them or coordinated them to attack the humans. I mean, as strange as it sounds I thought Eywa was only a few steps away from the Borg.
 
icarus-daedelus said:
Well, Eywa doesn't control humanoids; presumably it can't control self-aware beings. Maybe it doesn't really 'control' anything, but rather functions like a shared subconscious, suggesting things to the inhabitants of the planet that will preserve the balance of life on Pandora.

Anyway, there's nothing inherently negative about a Borg-like concept. IIRC collective consciousness was portrayed positively in the later Foundation books.

Yep, the planet/organism Gaia. Very cool stuff.

Especially that cliffhanger at the end of Book 7 ;_;.
 
icarus-daedelus said:
Well, Eywa doesn't control humanoids; presumably it can't control self-aware beings. Maybe it doesn't really 'control' anything, but rather functions like a shared subconscious, suggesting things to the inhabitants of the planet that will preserve the balance of life on Pandora.

Anyway, there's nothing inherently negative about a Borg-like concept. IIRC collective consciousness was portrayed positively in the later Foundation books.

I think Eywa could influence the humanoids as well. It's just they were already involved in the fight. If Eywa knew ahead of time that there was an imminent attack like when Jake was asking for help, I tend to believe it woulhd have warned the Na'vi as well.

The ones that need encouragement however were the animals since they didn't have a clue what was going on, but the Na'vi already did. Also, it's pretty clear that this is not something Ewya normally did. In fact, the Na'vi did not know of a time it had happened before which was why Ewya was considered neuitral in the affair.
 
JGS said:
I think Eywa could influence the humanoids as well. It's just they were already involved in the fight. If Eywa knew ahead of time that there was an imminent attack like when Jake was asking for help, I tend to believe it woulhd have warned the Na'vi as well.

The ones that need encouragement however were the animals since they didn't have a clue what was going on, but the Na'vi already did. Also, it's pretty clear that this is not something Ewya normally did. In fact, the Na'vi did not know of a time it had happened before which was why Ewya was considered neuitral in the affair.

I remember reading an earlier post about the original scriptment for the film, how several people on earth have dreams of flying over a forest. Seeming that Eywa is calling to human kind to save them, since it only wants to protect the preservation of life. In the theatrical version, we only see Jake having the dream...but in fact it's many more on Earth. Haven't read the scriptment tho...
 
JGS said:
I think Eywa could influence the humanoids as well. It's just they were already involved in the fight. If Eywa knew ahead of time that there was an imminent attack like when Jake was asking for help, I tend to believe it woulhd have warned the Na'vi as well.

The ones that need encouragement however were the animals since they didn't have a clue what was going on, but the Na'vi already did. Also, it's pretty clear that this is not something Ewya normally did. In fact, the Na'vi did not know of a time it had happened before which was why Ewya was considered neuitral in the affair.
True. And even within the context of the movie, it's left entirely reasonable why Eywa would respond the way she did: she protects the "balance of life". A balance that was threatened by an outside intruder. So she reacted like a body attacking an infection: systemic rejection.

It wasn't so much that she stayed neutral, as she was trying to keep a balance. And that means rejecting whatever forces threaten to be too destructive.
 
I just figured Eywa, being the internet of sorts, sent out a message to all inhabitants of Pandora that their world was under siege, and it would be in everyone's best interest to put aside their differences (ie. thanator curbing his desire to eat Na'vi) and fight to protect their world.
 
Solo said:
I just figured Eywa, being the internet of sorts, sent out a message to all inhabitants of Pandora that their world was under siege, and it would be in everyone's best interest to put aside their differences (ie. thanator curbing his desire to eat Na'vi) and fight to protect their world.
Pretty much.

Also, here's a countdown of sorts, in graph form. Passing TDK is a lock next week, and then it's a question of legs to hit Titanic (I think the ship will sink).

vfd2lj.jpg
 
Are you guys really suprised that (some) conservatives wouldn't like Avatar? I walked out of the theater knowing my neo-conservative in-laws would HATE the movie.
 
Monday's totals are in and Avatar is now the #5 highest grossing movie domestically. Will definitely hit #4 by Wednesday (possibly tomorrow) and #3 before the weekend is over. After that TDK should be around $60-65M away. Only two weeks after that at most?
 
If Avatar gets a Best Picture nom then the ship will undoubtedly sink.

Pre-Avatar I truly thought it would be another good five years before it would happen.
 
No matter what, this movie is going to have people hate it for one reason or another. It is that way with everything in the entertainment business. No one can please EVERY person. If you enjoy it like me...then just enjoy it. Let others have their own opinions on what is good and what is bad because as time has shown...you will not change their minds..EVER.

Anyways...onto 2 billion Avatar! GO!
 
Evlar said:
If Avatar gets a Best Picture nom then the ship will undoubtedly sink.
no... it has to win. without a win it will be close (probably within $30M or so). Even with a nom it will be close in Titanic's favor. With a BP win though, yeah... Titanic will probably go down by about $15-25M.
 
GhaleonEB said:
True. And even within the context of the movie, it's left entirely reasonable why Eywa would respond the way she did: she protects the "balance of life". A balance that was threatened by an outside intruder. So she reacted like a body attacking an infection: systemic rejection.

It wasn't so much that she stayed neutral, as she was trying to keep a balance. And that means rejecting whatever forces threaten to be too destructive.

I agree. I actually did a typo. I meant to say that she was considered neutral until the planet was attacked. That's when Neytiri realized she wasn't neutral at all, just the planet apparently had never endangered itself; it was only when us rascally humans came on the scene.

However, I do think her warning came from Jake in his "prayer".
 
LosDaddie said:
Are you guys really suprised that (some) conservatives wouldn't like Avatar? I walked out of the theater knowing my neo-conservative in-laws would HATE the movie.


I thought the liberal message in Avatar was so cheesy and over the top that it wouldn't effect people in a serious way. It covers such common tropes that exist in other movies that it's hard to even quantify it as a "message" and more like a Hollywood cliche.

But this seems to happen every time some movies reach a certain threshold of public saturation. The media comes in and tries to overreach and create conflict where there is none. I remember the same kind of "battle" happened over Forrest Gump. Some claimed it was a liberal movie and some claimed it was a conservative movie. etc etc.
 
ToxicAdam said:
I thought the liberal message in Avatar was so cheesy and over the top that it wouldn't effect people in a serious way. It covers such common tropes that exist in other movies that it's hard to even quantify it as a "message" and more like a Hollywood cliche.

But this seems to happen every time some movies reach a certain threshold of public saturation. The media comes in and tries to overreach and create conflict where there is none. I remember the same kind of "battle" happened over Forrest Gump. Some claimed it was a liberal movie and some claimed it was a conservative movie. etc etc.
On that note: "the libertarian take on Avatar"
 
ToxicAdam said:
I thought the liberal message in Avatar was so cheesy and over the top that it wouldn't effect people in a serious way. It covers such common tropes that exist in other movies that it's hard to even quantify it as a "message" and more like a Hollywood cliche.

But this seems to happen every time some movies reach a certain threshold of public saturation. The media comes in and tries to overreach and create conflict where there is none. I remember the same kind of "battle" happened over Forrest Gump. Some claimed it was a liberal movie and some claimed it was a conservative movie. etc etc.

They had a field day over Happy Feet of all things, so I knew the negativity would hit Avatar.
 
JGS said:
We didn't delve deep enough to know what the Na'vi are capable of. Personally I thought I saw greed, jealousy, & hate gainst Jake. Rumor from the encyclopedia is they had conflicts with other Na'vi. Further, there is not that much interaction outside of a particular tribe, just like with humans.

I think it is human nature to not hurt your family/friends s the Na'vi weren't acting unusual in that regard. What is unusual is the interaction they have with their world. I wouldn't call that slavery. I think they understand the balance they have to keep to make sure the planet stays around.

I also don't think the Na'vi are anymore savage than the mercs who are out to kill them/manifest destiny just for a mineral deposit which is what Cameron is getting at. He obviously is not against technology or even against war/violence, but he appears to be against it's use to hurt others and the environment for commercial gain. I don't have a problem with that message even if I was whacky enough to disagree with it.

Good points. I suppose the colonial america analogy had europeans getting members of one tribe to betray another tribe rather than starting intratribal conflict. But I still think we have merchantile goods the Na'vi might appreciate.

I'm sure Cameron would say the Na'vi are willing participants in the maintence of balance on Pandora. But in my view, a planet spanning organic network means that all other competition to said network has been eliminated. Eywa purposefully creates the Na'vi to act as caretakers to destroy anthign that challenges its worldwide dominance.

Think about it. To maintain the "balance" implies stasis. The Na'vi can't grow in numbers because their environment is fully exploited to the extent that it can be without resource loss. So they must endure rigorous breeding programs and create the ridiculously lethal rite of adulthood to control their numbers. They are ALL hunters, necessary to sustain their minimalist lifestyle (the lifestyle mandated by Eywa). There are no dedicated craftsmen, because the society can't support any. This is clearly evident when the reward for surviving the rite of adulthood is the "privilege" of making a bow from the home tree. In a more progressive society this would be some by a dedicated bowyer, as practice makes perfect, but for the Na'vi, everyone gets their one shot at it, regardless of their ability.

If the Na'vi were not kept in an infantile state by Eywa, they would rebel and begin to build themselves.

And I even think that Eywa doesn't care for the Na'vi in particular. Consider what it does. Jake makes his empassioned plea to the Na'vi. But they, passive as they are, do nothing and lose their home tree. Na'vi are killed, a tree is lost, but Eywa does nothing. But when EYWA itself, her network node, is threatened, it responds! I bet Jakes plea to Eywa is immaterial. The Na'vi defense is immaterial, the animals could have repelled that attack all on their own.

So Eywa acts to protect itself, the Na'vi are just the gardeners :P

Heh heh, the mere fact that I spend this time analyizing a film shows how much I like it :P
 
Count Dookkake said:
JAKE FUCKING SAYS THEY ARE MERCENARIES IN THE FIRST 5 FUCKING MINUTES OF THE MOVIE.

Sorry for the shouting, guys. It is not directed at you.

well what he said was they are the military but "out here they basically act like mercenaries"
 
jason10mm said:
Good points. I suppose the colonial america analogy had europeans getting members of one tribe to betray another tribe rather than starting intratribal conflict. But I still think we have merchantile goods the Na'vi might appreciate.

I'm sure Cameron would say the Na'vi are willing participants in the maintence of balance on Pandora. But in my view, a planet spanning organic network means that all other competition to said network has been eliminated. Eywa purposefully creates the Na'vi to act as caretakers to destroy anthign that challenges its worldwide dominance.

Think about it. To maintain the "balance" implies stasis. [...]

So Eywa acts to protect itself, the Na'vi are just the gardeners :P

That's how I felt about Eywa, but couldn't quite articulate. Definately something that can be explored in a sequel though. The way Eywa chose Jake, I definitely thought it was using him somewhat and maybe that's why he could do that legendary feat. If Eywa was more aggressive, it would have been like a biological skynet.
 
Just saw it. 11:30AM showing, theater was 1/5 full which is pretty damn impressive I think for a Tuesday morning :lol

The movie was alright, good graphics for the most part (there were a few little quirks where the 3d didn't really work for me) predictable story but still a decent movie. There were a few short segments that didn't really belong in the film, but others really added to the film
the burning of his brother's corpse and then Jake waking up after the burning of the Home Tree
. I can't wait to see the final "directors" cut though, sounds like some good stuff got cut to trim the film's length.
 
Somnia said:
No matter what, this movie is going to have people hate it for one reason or another. It is that way with everything in the entertainment business. No one can please EVERY person. If you enjoy it like me...then just enjoy it. Let others have their own opinions on what is good and what is bad because as time has shown...you will not change their minds..EVER.

Anyways...onto 2 billion Avatar! GO!

Soon we will be getting pure vitriol hate threads and people calling this the worse movie ever and so forth.
 
I saw this movie with my dad. Retired Army/Vietnam Vet/Seargent.

He had zero issue with the violence against the military in the movie.

It's set in 2156 if I'm not mistake, which is why he didnt care. :lol

People are ridiculous.

Ma poopooo hurtz caus the avatarz
 
By the way, the bluray is being released on April 21. No idea what cuts there are. That is a date I saw being advertised here in Aus at video stores and I just read that as the date bandied about in the US by FOX.

That's a few days after my birthday.
 
Scullibundo said:
By the way, the bluray is being released on April 21. No idea what cuts there are. That is a date I saw being advertised here in Aus at video stores and I just read that as the date bandied about in the US by FOX.

That's a few days after my birthday.
Yeah, at this rate it will still be doing decent business. Weird that they'd cut that off for what will undoubtedly be a quickie release with minimal extras.
 
Anticitizen One said:
well what he said was they are the military but "out here they basically act like mercenaries"

No he said they were Army Dogs..Marines fighting for freedom,etc. back home, but out here they work for the Corporation for the money.

More or less
 
GhaleonEB said:
Yeah, at this rate it will still be doing decent business. Weird that they'd cut that off for what will undoubtedly be a quickie release with minimal extras.

Without 3D screens and IMAX, it will be dead weight by April.
 
jett said:
Without 3D screens and IMAX, it will be dead weight by April.
Not necessarily, especially if Fox gives it a promotional push or two, which might well happen if Avatar sputters out just short of Titanic. If I were them I would delay its release in favor of one with more footage / features and a higher theatrical gross.
 
Seen it 3 times now, but I still don't get one thing.
At the end when Neytiri is trying to revive Jake's avatar after she kills Quaritch, she somehow suddenly realizes that his human form is in the trailer next to her, and she jumps in to save him. There doesn't seem to be anything to inform her of this; she just figures it out on her own. She's obviously an intelligent creature, but I still find it hard to accept that she is able to figure this out on her own.

Furthermore, she is able to figure out that Jake needs the emergency air mask to stay alive. I suppose she could have recalled seeing other humans wearing these masks, but how would she know what they are for?
 
ArachosiA 78 said:
Seen it 3 times now, but I still don't get one thing.
At the end when Neytiri is trying to revive Jake's avatar after she kills Quaritch, she somehow suddenly realizes that his human form is in the trailer next to her, and she jumps in to save him. There doesn't seem to be anything to inform her of this; she just figures it out on her own. She's obviously an intelligent creature, but I still find it hard to accept that she is able to figure this out on her own.

Furthermore, she is able to figure out that Jake needs the emergency air mask to stay alive. I suppose she could have recalled seeing other humans wearing these masks, but how would she know what they are for?
Not sure if we still need spoiler tags, but here goes:

She was entirely focused on Jake until she noticed the alarm going off in the remote station; you can see her looking up and then around to investigate it after a few moments. She also would have seen the entire exchange between Jake and Quaritch, and probably known what was up.

As to the masks, humans had been around for decades at that point (I think). So anytime she would have seen one, they'd have had a mask on. I think they knew what they were for (Grace had one on when they tried to save her).

Another instance of the Na'vi recognizing them is when Tsu'tey goes down; before he does he smashes the mask of at least two people.
 
ArachosiA 78 said:
Seen it 3 times now, but I still don't get one thing.
At the end when Neytiri is trying to revive Jake's avatar after she kills Quaritch, she somehow suddenly realizes that his human form is in the trailer next to her, and she jumps in to save him. There doesn't seem to be anything to inform her of this; she just figures it out on her own. She's obviously an intelligent creature, but I still find it hard to accept that she is able to figure this out on her own.

Furthermore, she is able to figure out that Jake needs the emergency air mask to stay alive. I suppose she could have recalled seeing other humans wearing these masks, but how would she know what they are for?

For your second question Humans have been on the planet for 10+ years...the NA'Vi know they need masks to breath so that's an easy one to explain.

For the first question...1)She saw Quaritch attacking the trailer which is probably a pretty good indication of whats happening when Jake collapses. 2) She has seen Grace/Jake collapse before from being "turned off" in their link. She probably knew of their location or knew they were near by since they ran from the human base. I am sure Jake informed some of them where they were so they weren't attacked by NA'Vi patrolling or something.
 
As far as my thoughts on Eywa are concerned, I had always considered the consciousness of Eywa to be the cumulative downloaded consciousness of all the Navi who uploaded their brains to Eywa before dying. (Isn't that what they said they do?)

I figured that in the beginning the planet-wide neural network developed without sentience, but gradually, as the Navi evolved into an intelligent species and started uploading their brains into the planet, the community consciousness known as Eywa was formed.

I guess this would also depend on whether or not non-Navi can interface with the planet like the Na'vi do, and if so, would the combined consciousness of non-sentient beings have been enough to form a sentient Eywa millions of years ago.

At any rate, if the Na'vi are slaves to Eywa, they are essentially slaves to themselves assuming that Eywa is made up of the combined consciousness of all Navi ancestors.
 
just got back from watching avatar. great movie and much better than i thought it would be. although wearing the 3d glasses kinda hurt my eyes a little. never seen an entire movie in 3d before.
 
Good article from Variety on the new process of editing for AVATAR. Really interesting stuff.

http://www.variety.com/index.asp?layout=awardcentral&jump=news&articleid=VR1118013679&cs=1
After sharing an editing credit on "Titanic" with two other people, helmer James Cameron planned on cutting "Avatar" by himself. But even the indefatigable Cameron soon found there was simply more sheer work than he could handle. Eventually he again found himself with two collaborators on his billion-dollar blockbuster: John Refoua and Stephen Rivkin.
"Our original projections about how the film would be (edited) were predicated on an early test with a simple scene of two people talking -- but pretty much everything else in the film is not two people talking," says Cameron, acknowledging that "the amount of labor and hours required … was probably our biggest underestimation. It quickly became clear that I wasn't going be able to do everything."

At first Cameron resisted the idea of hiring other editors, thinking, "How do you bring someone up to speed when there's no one in the world who knows how to do this other than within our group? We're starting from scratch with a new process. The answer: get smart guys and have them figure it out with you."

Cameron hired Refoua first, but then "we realized that John would not be able to handle it all, so we brought in Steve."

Editing "Avatar" was complex largely because most of the film's footage consists of performance capture, a technology that offers many more editorial options than straight live action. It also let Cameron exercise his perfectionism and explore a process that goes way beyond standard live-action editing by giving him the ability to isolate and combine the best individual actor performances from each take.

In fact, the team had to invent new terms or meanings for what they were doing, such as a "stitch," a "combo" and a "load."

As Cameron explains: "You might like Zoe (Saldana) from take four and Sam (Worthington) from take eight. Now you're doing a 'combo.' Or you like Zoe from take four until a certain line of dialogue, then from take seven. Then you're doing a stitch -- stitching her motion together."

Rivkin elaborates: "Normally, when you shoot a live-action movie, and there's more than one actor in a shot, you're limited to the performances in that take. In 'Avatar,' after the performances were captured, Jim often wanted to combine performances from different takes into a camera 'load' -- or section of a scene -- and build a composite from different performances.

"We were able to create a 'master' that had the best performances from every actor -- combining actors in the same load and 'stitching' them together if necessary," Rivkin adds.

"We could also use the performance capture from two different takes of the same actor, which could be made into a continuous take, so you aren't limited by one particular performance. The first line can be from one take, the next line from another."

The goal was "to have every option available," Rivkin emphasizes. "Some actors peak at take one, some at take 10. By combining different performances in the same load, you have the flexibility to create the best possible master."

This "building of performance loads was one of the most complex workflows you can imagine," Rivkin observes.

The three editors worked together closely. "Steve and I were right next to each other, Jim was down the hall," says Refoua, who got a longer gig than he bargained for when he joined the project. "Originally I came on for just six weeks to help out. I was still there 120 weeks later."

Rivkin, who also worked for 2 years on "Avatar," was anticipating a break after working on two "Pirates of the Caribbean" films back to back when he got the call from Cameron.

"Jim was looking at a set on his viewfinder. Nothing was there on the stage, but in his camera there was a whole virtual world. … He showed me some of the stuff they were working on and I realized that day that this was an extraordinary project."
 
Neat article, Sculli.

Funny thing is how much the cineastes bitched and moaned when Lucas talked about this stuff back in 99. "Oh, it's violence against acting" type bullshit.

What a difference a decade makes!
 
Count Dookkake said:
Neat article, Sculli.

Funny thing is how much the cineastes bitched and moaned when Lucas talked about this stuff back in 99. "Oh, it's violence against acting" type bullshit.

What a difference a decade makes!

To be fair, a lot of the actor's performance was made up by a committee of animators in Lucas' films. There wasn't much that was natural about the process, which is very different to AVATAR.
 
Scullibundo said:
To be fair, a lot of the actor's performance was made up by a committee of animators in Lucas' films. There wasn't much that was natural about the process, which is very different to AVATAR.

To be fair, that's not what I 'm talking about. :P

I should have been more clear. Lucas talked about stitching together different takes into single shots, and different facial expressions from one take onto others, all involving flesh and blood actors, not in reference to the animated characters.
 
Count Dookkake said:
To be fair, that's not what I 'm talking about. :P

I should have been more clear. Lucas talked about stitching together different takes into single shots, and different facial expressions from one take onto others, all involving flesh and blood actors, not in reference to the animated characters.

The complaints were based on Lucas taking the absolute worst takes and combining those together.

At least, I assume that is what he did given the quality of performances turned in.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom