icarus-daedelus said:? I thought Emperor Palpatine was the ruler of the Vatican.
Evlar said:It's one theme of the film: the ignorant dismiss phenomena they don't understand as religious hocus-pocus while the informed are busy tying it down to the physical sciences.
icarus-daedelus said:Well, Eywa doesn't control humanoids; presumably it can't control self-aware beings. Maybe it doesn't really 'control' anything, but rather functions like a shared subconscious, suggesting things to the inhabitants of the planet that will preserve the balance of life on Pandora.
Anyway, there's nothing inherently negative about a Borg-like concept. IIRC collective consciousness was portrayed positively in the later Foundation books.
icarus-daedelus said:Well, Eywa doesn't control humanoids; presumably it can't control self-aware beings. Maybe it doesn't really 'control' anything, but rather functions like a shared subconscious, suggesting things to the inhabitants of the planet that will preserve the balance of life on Pandora.
Anyway, there's nothing inherently negative about a Borg-like concept. IIRC collective consciousness was portrayed positively in the later Foundation books.
JGS said:I think Eywa could influence the humanoids as well. It's just they were already involved in the fight. If Eywa knew ahead of time that there was an imminent attack like when Jake was asking for help, I tend to believe it woulhd have warned the Na'vi as well.
The ones that need encouragement however were the animals since they didn't have a clue what was going on, but the Na'vi already did. Also, it's pretty clear that this is not something Ewya normally did. In fact, the Na'vi did not know of a time it had happened before which was why Ewya was considered neuitral in the affair.
True. And even within the context of the movie, it's left entirely reasonable why Eywa would respond the way she did: she protects the "balance of life". A balance that was threatened by an outside intruder. So she reacted like a body attacking an infection: systemic rejection.JGS said:I think Eywa could influence the humanoids as well. It's just they were already involved in the fight. If Eywa knew ahead of time that there was an imminent attack like when Jake was asking for help, I tend to believe it woulhd have warned the Na'vi as well.
The ones that need encouragement however were the animals since they didn't have a clue what was going on, but the Na'vi already did. Also, it's pretty clear that this is not something Ewya normally did. In fact, the Na'vi did not know of a time it had happened before which was why Ewya was considered neuitral in the affair.
Pretty much.Solo said:I just figured Eywa, being the internet of sorts, sent out a message to all inhabitants of Pandora that their world was under siege, and it would be in everyone's best interest to put aside their differences (ie. thanator curbing his desire to eat Na'vi) and fight to protect their world.
Evlar said:When Avatar gets a Best Picture nom then the ship will undoubtedly sink.
no... it has to win. without a win it will be close (probably within $30M or so). Even with a nom it will be close in Titanic's favor. With a BP win though, yeah... Titanic will probably go down by about $15-25M.Evlar said:If Avatar gets a Best Picture nom then the ship will undoubtedly sink.
GhaleonEB said:True. And even within the context of the movie, it's left entirely reasonable why Eywa would respond the way she did: she protects the "balance of life". A balance that was threatened by an outside intruder. So she reacted like a body attacking an infection: systemic rejection.
It wasn't so much that she stayed neutral, as she was trying to keep a balance. And that means rejecting whatever forces threaten to be too destructive.
LosDaddie said:Are you guys really suprised that (some) conservatives wouldn't like Avatar? I walked out of the theater knowing my neo-conservative in-laws would HATE the movie.
On that note: "the libertarian take on Avatar"ToxicAdam said:I thought the liberal message in Avatar was so cheesy and over the top that it wouldn't effect people in a serious way. It covers such common tropes that exist in other movies that it's hard to even quantify it as a "message" and more like a Hollywood cliche.
But this seems to happen every time some movies reach a certain threshold of public saturation. The media comes in and tries to overreach and create conflict where there is none. I remember the same kind of "battle" happened over Forrest Gump. Some claimed it was a liberal movie and some claimed it was a conservative movie. etc etc.
ToxicAdam said:I thought the liberal message in Avatar was so cheesy and over the top that it wouldn't effect people in a serious way. It covers such common tropes that exist in other movies that it's hard to even quantify it as a "message" and more like a Hollywood cliche.
But this seems to happen every time some movies reach a certain threshold of public saturation. The media comes in and tries to overreach and create conflict where there is none. I remember the same kind of "battle" happened over Forrest Gump. Some claimed it was a liberal movie and some claimed it was a conservative movie. etc etc.
JGS said:We didn't delve deep enough to know what the Na'vi are capable of. Personally I thought I saw greed, jealousy, & hate gainst Jake. Rumor from the encyclopedia is they had conflicts with other Na'vi. Further, there is not that much interaction outside of a particular tribe, just like with humans.
I think it is human nature to not hurt your family/friends s the Na'vi weren't acting unusual in that regard. What is unusual is the interaction they have with their world. I wouldn't call that slavery. I think they understand the balance they have to keep to make sure the planet stays around.
I also don't think the Na'vi are anymore savage than the mercs who are out to kill them/manifest destiny just for a mineral deposit which is what Cameron is getting at. He obviously is not against technology or even against war/violence, but he appears to be against it's use to hurt others and the environment for commercial gain. I don't have a problem with that message even if I was whacky enough to disagree with it.
Count Dookkake said:JAKE FUCKING SAYS THEY ARE MERCENARIES IN THE FIRST 5 FUCKING MINUTES OF THE MOVIE.
Sorry for the shouting, guys. It is not directed at you.
jason10mm said:Good points. I suppose the colonial america analogy had europeans getting members of one tribe to betray another tribe rather than starting intratribal conflict. But I still think we have merchantile goods the Na'vi might appreciate.
I'm sure Cameron would say the Na'vi are willing participants in the maintence of balance on Pandora. But in my view, a planet spanning organic network means that all other competition to said network has been eliminated. Eywa purposefully creates the Na'vi to act as caretakers to destroy anthign that challenges its worldwide dominance.
Think about it. To maintain the "balance" implies stasis. [...]
So Eywa acts to protect itself, the Na'vi are just the gardeners![]()
Somnia said:No matter what, this movie is going to have people hate it for one reason or another. It is that way with everything in the entertainment business. No one can please EVERY person. If you enjoy it like me...then just enjoy it. Let others have their own opinions on what is good and what is bad because as time has shown...you will not change their minds..EVER.
Anyways...onto 2 billion Avatar! GO!
Yeah, at this rate it will still be doing decent business. Weird that they'd cut that off for what will undoubtedly be a quickie release with minimal extras.Scullibundo said:By the way, the bluray is being released on April 21. No idea what cuts there are. That is a date I saw being advertised here in Aus at video stores and I just read that as the date bandied about in the US by FOX.
That's a few days after my birthday.
Scullibundo said:By the way, the bluray is being released on April 21.
Jill Sandwich said:Going to go see it again this weekend now I've got some cash! Musn't forget the pizza.
Anticitizen One said:well what he said was they are the military but "out here they basically act like mercenaries"
Anticitizen One said:well what he said was they are the military but "out here they basically act like mercenaries"
GhaleonEB said:Yeah, at this rate it will still be doing decent business. Weird that they'd cut that off for what will undoubtedly be a quickie release with minimal extras.
Heh. I forgot all about Alice in Wonderland, that will jettison Avatar from the 3D screens.jett said:Without 3D screens and IMAX, it will be dead weight by April.
Not necessarily, especially if Fox gives it a promotional push or two, which might well happen if Avatar sputters out just short of Titanic. If I were them I would delay its release in favor of one with more footage / features and a higher theatrical gross.jett said:Without 3D screens and IMAX, it will be dead weight by April.
Not sure if we still need spoiler tags, but here goes:ArachosiA 78 said:Seen it 3 times now, but I still don't get one thing.At the end when Neytiri is trying to revive Jake's avatar after she kills Quaritch, she somehow suddenly realizes that his human form is in the trailer next to her, and she jumps in to save him. There doesn't seem to be anything to inform her of this; she just figures it out on her own. She's obviously an intelligent creature, but I still find it hard to accept that she is able to figure this out on her own.
Furthermore, she is able to figure out that Jake needs the emergency air mask to stay alive. I suppose she could have recalled seeing other humans wearing these masks, but how would she know what they are for?
ArachosiA 78 said:Seen it 3 times now, but I still don't get one thing.At the end when Neytiri is trying to revive Jake's avatar after she kills Quaritch, she somehow suddenly realizes that his human form is in the trailer next to her, and she jumps in to save him. There doesn't seem to be anything to inform her of this; she just figures it out on her own. She's obviously an intelligent creature, but I still find it hard to accept that she is able to figure this out on her own.
Furthermore, she is able to figure out that Jake needs the emergency air mask to stay alive. I suppose she could have recalled seeing other humans wearing these masks, but how would she know what they are for?
Yeah, the planet is sentient. Because the na'vi have been uploading their brains to it for thousands of years.Scullibundo said:Nah, I like the idea of a sentient planet better.
After sharing an editing credit on "Titanic" with two other people, helmer James Cameron planned on cutting "Avatar" by himself. But even the indefatigable Cameron soon found there was simply more sheer work than he could handle. Eventually he again found himself with two collaborators on his billion-dollar blockbuster: John Refoua and Stephen Rivkin.
"Our original projections about how the film would be (edited) were predicated on an early test with a simple scene of two people talking -- but pretty much everything else in the film is not two people talking," says Cameron, acknowledging that "the amount of labor and hours required was probably our biggest underestimation. It quickly became clear that I wasn't going be able to do everything."
At first Cameron resisted the idea of hiring other editors, thinking, "How do you bring someone up to speed when there's no one in the world who knows how to do this other than within our group? We're starting from scratch with a new process. The answer: get smart guys and have them figure it out with you."
Cameron hired Refoua first, but then "we realized that John would not be able to handle it all, so we brought in Steve."
Editing "Avatar" was complex largely because most of the film's footage consists of performance capture, a technology that offers many more editorial options than straight live action. It also let Cameron exercise his perfectionism and explore a process that goes way beyond standard live-action editing by giving him the ability to isolate and combine the best individual actor performances from each take.
In fact, the team had to invent new terms or meanings for what they were doing, such as a "stitch," a "combo" and a "load."
As Cameron explains: "You might like Zoe (Saldana) from take four and Sam (Worthington) from take eight. Now you're doing a 'combo.' Or you like Zoe from take four until a certain line of dialogue, then from take seven. Then you're doing a stitch -- stitching her motion together."
Rivkin elaborates: "Normally, when you shoot a live-action movie, and there's more than one actor in a shot, you're limited to the performances in that take. In 'Avatar,' after the performances were captured, Jim often wanted to combine performances from different takes into a camera 'load' -- or section of a scene -- and build a composite from different performances.
"We were able to create a 'master' that had the best performances from every actor -- combining actors in the same load and 'stitching' them together if necessary," Rivkin adds.
"We could also use the performance capture from two different takes of the same actor, which could be made into a continuous take, so you aren't limited by one particular performance. The first line can be from one take, the next line from another."
The goal was "to have every option available," Rivkin emphasizes. "Some actors peak at take one, some at take 10. By combining different performances in the same load, you have the flexibility to create the best possible master."
This "building of performance loads was one of the most complex workflows you can imagine," Rivkin observes.
The three editors worked together closely. "Steve and I were right next to each other, Jim was down the hall," says Refoua, who got a longer gig than he bargained for when he joined the project. "Originally I came on for just six weeks to help out. I was still there 120 weeks later."
Rivkin, who also worked for 2 years on "Avatar," was anticipating a break after working on two "Pirates of the Caribbean" films back to back when he got the call from Cameron.
"Jim was looking at a set on his viewfinder. Nothing was there on the stage, but in his camera there was a whole virtual world. He showed me some of the stuff they were working on and I realized that day that this was an extraordinary project."
Count Dookkake said:Neat article, Sculli.
Funny thing is how much the cineastes bitched and moaned when Lucas talked about this stuff back in 99. "Oh, it's violence against acting" type bullshit.
What a difference a decade makes!
Scullibundo said:To be fair, a lot of the actor's performance was made up by a committee of animators in Lucas' films. There wasn't much that was natural about the process, which is very different to AVATAR.
Count Dookkake said:To be fair, that's not what I 'm talking about.
I should have been more clear. Lucas talked about stitching together different takes into single shots, and different facial expressions from one take onto others, all involving flesh and blood actors, not in reference to the animated characters.