It is indeed! Thanksborder said:LieMAX uses digital projectors, while traditional IMAX uses celluloid film. LieMAX will have the superior image quality and superior looking 3D, if it's any consolation...
border said:There are minor plot holes like "Why do arrows go through bulletproof glass?" and "Why don't they just mine somewhere that doesn't require a massive military engagement?" You can imagine away the answers if you like.....none of it is really that bothersome.
Well, as I thought was perfectly made clear in the movieborder said:Military operations are not cheap. If the humans are cheap then they probably would look for smaller deposits of unobtainium, rather than trying to mine the one area of the planet that would require large-scale genocide and a massive disruption of an ecosystem.
DY_nasty said:Even the most mechanically impaired child can figure out that you can put a stick into something you can't fit your finger into. If they wanted to use those guns, they could've found a way. Any explanation as to "why not" would've been nice.
polyh3dron said:Most if not all current HDTVs that have a 120hz refresh rate do not actually accept a 1080p/120fps input. The new 3D capable HDTVs coming out soon will be capable of it though.
WretchedTruman said:Got back from it a few hours ago. Wrote up a review; gonna go see it again tomorrow to see how it holds up in 2D.
Just gotta say, a lot of this "criticism" can be rebutted with "it's a fuckin' movie, dood."
quadriplegicjon said:Sexy. after this movie.. i'll definitely be looking into one of those.
by the way. this movie was just fucken awesome. i really really loved it.. and i was even a bit skeptical going in.
Saw it in IMAX 3D, but my friend just isn't into the 3D phenomenon quite yet, and I've yet to convince her, so...eh.quadriplegicjon said:why?
see it in RealD 3D.. and then IMAX 3D, or vise versa. That is what I am doing!![]()
From what I've read, the 3D Avatar BD will be backwards compatible with regular BD players/screens. There will probably be only one Avatar BD for both 3D and 2D and I don't see them charging extra for it TBH.StoOgE said:They *just* approved the standard a few days ago. I imagine they will be super expensive at first. I also expect the 3d capable Blurays to carry a hefty premium for a few years.
lolololololololmac said:Sweet except for that part were the colonel says, "you're not in Kansas anymore." The entire theater literally threw up and I didn't even bother watching the rest of the movie.
mac said:Sweet except for that part were the colonel says, "you're not in Kansas anymore." The entire theater literally threw up and I didn't even bother watching the rest of the movie.
mac said:Sweet except for that part were the colonel says, "you're not in Kansas anymore." The entire theater literally threw up and I didn't even bother watching the rest of the movie.
Broadbandito said:..joke post?
ToxicAdam said:Don't get me wrong, there are 6 "groan worthy" moments in this film. But they are just that .. moments. They don't take you out of the movie and they don't lessen the overall experience. Personally, I think this movie is going to be lame as a rental. Without the effect of 3D, I doubt the world (and the Na'vi) really feel alive at all. It really sells the experience.
Can you list those? I want to see if I groaned too.ToxicAdam said:Don't get me wrong, there are 6 "groan worthy" moments in this film. But they are just that .. moments.
Even though i didn't think that the 3D effect was revolutionary in it's use, i'm going to agree with you there for those of us who see it in 3D first. It sets the precedent. i saw bits of it in 2D just to see the difference, but i have no interest in watching the entire film that way.ToxicAdam said:Personally, I think this movie is going to be lame as a rental. Without the effect of 3D, I doubt the world (and the Na'vi) really feel alive at all. It really sells the experience.
shintoki said:Okay, quick question. What are with these theaters and not letting you keep the glasses? You charge me an extra 3$ just for 3D. Then say I have to give them back? Aren't they getting them from the studios for free too or something? And even so...why not give me my 3$ back if I give you your glasses back.
Why? They use to be free. You still had to return them. But they didn't charge any extra outside of the Imax price if it was in 3D also.Jax said:stop. think about what you're saying. then shut up.
The Real 3D theater I went to tonight gave out new glasses sealed in plastic bags. We could keep them if we wanted, or drop them in a recycle box outside the theater exit. Since they will charge extra whether I bring back the glasses or not, I just tossed them in the box.shintoki said:Why? They use to be free. You still had to return them. But they didn't charge any extra outside of the Imax price if it was in 3D also.
Combine said:Can you list those? I want to see if I groaned too.
Those were some great impressions though. I could definitely see the sequels being moved up to quick production if the film does that to a lot of people and makes the money.
shintoki said:Why? They use to be free. You still had to return them. But they didn't charge any extra outside of the Imax price if it was in 3D also.
ToxicAdam said:That's the one place where CGI-heavy movies still fail. They allow directors to show massive, epic battles (like LOTR), but they never really feel epic or real. It's just a mess of chaos interspersed with closeups of the heroes doing outrageous things.
Ah,ToxicAdam said:A few times when they wedged in the environmentalist preaching in the movie. A few pieces of dialog from the villain and both of the "tender scenes" with Jake and the female Na'vi. Just didn't feel right to me, but Cameron did a good job not lingering with them
Definitely, and I think what really helped was howSnowman Prophet of Doom said:I loved the final battle because Cameron shot it so well. He had a perfect concept of space and scale. There was no shaky-cam bullshit or quick editing; he allowed us to see what was happening and framed it in an interesting way.
Snowman Prophet of Doom said:I loved the final battle because Cameron shot it so well. He had a perfect concept of space and scale. There was no shaky-cam bullshit or quick editing; he allowed us to see what was happening and framed it in an interesting way.
I was actually surprised by the mechs and helicopters. They looked really fake in some of the promos and trailers, but they look very good in the final film.
One of my favorite vignettes in the movie; it fleshed out their bonding as including more than just these big rituals and trials. They were simply talking about a shared experience and becoming friends.Scullibundo said:In fact there is a scene in the movie that is reminiscent of that in itselfAfter Jake's first flight where you see him and Neytiri together by the cliffside and she's saying 'I came down like this and you were -' 'Oh yeah I banked right so hard' or something like that.
GhaleonEB said:The only really awkward moment I thought the movie had was when Quaritch mentioned how they had to make a "preemptive strike" for their own safety. The audience groaned a bit. I did too. But Cameron follows that up a few moments later with someone saying Quaritch was aiming for a "shock and awe" campaign, which cemented it even further. More groans, some laughter, in the theater. He couldn't leave good enough alone.
I was disappointed because Cameron had made clear in interviews (as the film was) that the behavior on display was more about the history of human nature, which while applicable to recent events was not limited to them. Linking the analogy so tightly to the Iraq war was unfortunate because some of that universality was lost, and it will date the movie a touch as it ages.
Maybe that's how it will be seen over time; perhaps that's even how Cameron meant it. But that's not how it came across to me because of the most recent use of the term. And at any rate, I didn't like the analogy to being specific to any particular conflict; it was a line that brought out a specific reaction in the audience, and for me at least broke the spell the move had cast.Scullibundo said:I felt it was a lot more akin to the Vietnam war campaign of shock and awe.
Dead said:So people who have read the Scriptment....just how much is different?
Scullibundo said:A lot. It would have been at LEAST 3 and a half hours full run time if it had gone by the original scriptment. Also, it really would have cost $500 million. I just have the feeling that Laeta Kalogridis who co-wrote the adaptation of the original treatment may have pushed for a much more stream-lined version of the story and characters. Characters, animals etc were even cut out from the original treatment.