DarkMehm said:
Good lord.
DarkMehm said:
jett said:So could this mean yet another 70+ million weekend? This really is Titanic 2. :lol
DarkMehm said:
Doesn't matter.syllogism said:It's still way behind for example Return of the King in # tickets sold. Just trying to keep some perspective here.
Bleepey said:The film was OK, although the smurf sex was too odd for my liking. I saw it in 3d and i swas a bit disapointed. I mean, 3D improves the picture quality significanlty but other 3d films i had seen (this was a fim at the science museum) used the effects much better.
way behind?syllogism said:It's still way behind for example Return of the King in # tickets sold. Just trying to keep some perspective here.
DarkMehm said:
DarkMehm said:
1) Up 16% from last Monday.DarkMehm said:
:lolBob Loblaw said:
ToxicAdam said:It's not my favorite movie (not in my top 20), but it's one of my favorite "movie experiences" of all time. If that makes sense.
Yes it does. I don't think it's Cameron's best movie - though I need some more time to let it sink in - but it's one mother of a great theatrical experience.ToxicAdam said:Good. Glad so many people are experiencing this in a theatre. It's not my favorite movie (not in my top 20), but it's one of my favorite "movie experiences" of all time. If that makes sense.
irfan said:5th January, 2010 = 1B WW.
Or sooner :lol
Same for me. The overall experience for me was worth the admission (x3 and counting).Solo said:It completely does. Its not even close to my Top 20, but it is THE best theatrical experience Ive ever had.
syllogism said:It's still way behind for example Return of the King in # tickets sold. Just trying to keep some perspective here.
The CG in At World's End is noticeably inferior than the CG in Dead Man's Chest since I don't believe ILM's A team did the CG in At World's End like in Dead Man's Chest (they were working on Transformers). I was just watching Dead Man's Chest and the CG on Davy Jones's is still more impressive than anything I saw in Avatar. The way they got the weight of his tentacles just right is mindblowing. Then again I'm of the opinion that District 9 had better CG than Avatar, albeit on a much smaller scale. Maybe it was all of the hype that got to me but I just didn't find Avatar to be all that revolutionary. The CG was amazing but it was still in line from what I expected from a $300 million blockbuster. Nothing like watching Jurassic Park or Terminator 2 for the first time.Sharp said:You know, they were just showing the third of these (which I'm assuming you're referring to) on ABC tonight, and having finished watching it, I'm going to have to categorically disagree with this statement in nearly every way. And that's not knocking the CG in the POTC movies either.
LOL. Were the ears just a novelty?FirewalkR said:
U K Narayan said:LOL. Were the ears just a novelty?
FirewalkR said:I don't see any cues for the motion capture system and from what I know ears and tail were done by animators so I'm guessing it was so the actors would have a more... immersive experience. :lol
Perhaps if they had crowded scenes it would help the other actors know who was supposed to be Na'vi, but there were few scenes with both humans and Na'vi.
U K Narayan said:LOL. Were the ears just a novelty?
Avatar was less expensive to make then ALL of these movies.01 Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End $300m
02 Spider-Man 3 $258m
03 Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince $250m
04 Avatar $237m (official)
Jibril said:Avatar was less expensive to make then ALL of these movies.
Imagine that...
JasoNsider said:Soo, the movie is now completely sold out for the week over here. We were going to get tickets today but word must be spreading fast because now we can't go until next week's tickets become available. Now that is some insane word of mouth.
Jibril said:Avatar was less expensive to make then ALL of these movies.
Imagine that...
Solo said:You can also SEE where all the money went in Avatar, as opposed to those other movies. Imagine that. Almost $100M of S-M3 went straight into Maguire, Dunst and Raimi's pockets :lol
Solo said:You can also SEE where all the money went in Avatar, as opposed to those other movies. Imagine that. Almost $100M of S-M3 went straight into Maguire, Dunst and Raimi's pockets :lol
Part of the R&D is included in that budget. They're basically amortizing the R&D across a couple different movies, which does push the budget for Avatar down a bit.WrikaWrek said:Let's put aside the 400 million spent on R&D and just talk about the production budget.
As Ebert said, "There is still at least one man in Hollywood who knows how to spend $250 million, or was it $300 million, wisely."Solo said:You can also SEE where all the money went in Avatar, as opposed to those other movies. Imagine that. Almost $100M of S-M3 went straight into Maguire, Dunst and Raimi's pockets :lol
GhaleonEB said:Part of the R&D is included in that budget, as it's being amortized across several movies.
neoism said:"Avatar Exclusive -Behind The Scenes"
This shit is soo awesome, probably already posted.(It's like 2 weeks old) This is a great little Behind the Scenes! Man, I hope there's hours of this one the Bluray.
Just imagine what JC will do with this stuff 10 years from now!
Look, I know that, and was amplifying and clarifying your post not countering it. I have refined my post a bit to be more clear. I understand how studio budgets are reported, and Avatar in particular.WrikaWrek said:Look, the official budget is never the full budget. When insiders are telling us that Spiderman 3 cost almost 300 million, pirates the same, and that Avatar is the most expensive movie ever at 400 million, i believe those people. Because they get those numbers from producers, when the "official" budgets are given out by the Studio execs that divide and cut stuff from the production budget.
GhaleonEB said:Look, I know that, and was amplifying and clarifying your post not countering it.
Look, I made an edit to refine my post further.
Look, I'm not six years old and do actually understand how budgets are reported.
No worries, I had just stealth edited. Three "looks" was over kill. I was going for sarcasm, not anger.WrikaWrek said:No need to get upset. It's not like i know what you know, take it easy.
Jibril said:Got the Artbook for AVATAR today. I'm perplexed at the sheer beauty of this.
You guys need to check this out:http://www.amazon.com/dp/0810982862/?tag=neogaf0e-20
TacticalFox88 said:Anyone else thinking about buying a brand spanking new TV just for the Blu-ray release? I got a 50" Bravia back in October for Uncharted 2 and I'm already thinking of upgrading. :lol
Jibril said:Got the Artbook for AVATAR today. I'm perplexed at the sheer beauty of this.
You guys need to check this out:http://www.amazon.com/dp/0810982862/?tag=neogaf0e-20
aznpxdd said:Nice. Will purchase when I get home.
Well in that case we should be comparing adjusted grossesgdt5016 said:Doesn't matter.
Money is money.
People are willing to pay for the 3D/IMAX premium.
Jibril said:Got the Artbook for AVATAR today. I'm perplexed at the sheer beauty of this.