• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Rottenwatch: AVATAR (82%)

Status
Not open for further replies.
FirewalkR said:
How up-to-date are Boxofficemojo's overseas numbers? WW is at 745 million and US is at 268. 745 + the aforementioned 36 overseas would be 781, so... what's missing here?
Click to expand...
They have added domestic, but not international from yesterday. They also show about $12m less international box office than Variety and Deadline Hollywood are reporting.

They usually update international grosses in the next few hours.
 
TAJ said:
I finally went the day after Christmas, and saw it in RealD. The picture was as dim as I've come to expect 3D to be, but it's a cool gimmick and it helps make the CG look less fake.
Click to expand...

The dimmer picture isn't a 'gimmick', and not something they want. It simply the reality of the technology right now.
 
irfan said:
Yeah that is a cool moment. I thought most people would miss it as the convo is in the background and both Norm & Grace are out of focus. At that point in the movie, the convo didnt make sense either. :D
Click to expand...

I'm pretty sure they are just spouting off some generic signal cascade/transduction stuff.



I have not posted in this thread yet though, and I guess now would be a great time to say that I loved every minute of it! I went into the theatre expecting little, and came out blown away. It was the best theatrical experience I have been to since LOTR or the Lion King when I was a young kid. It made me feel like a 10 year old again.


In terms of word of mouth, I hear people talking about this all the time! a 34 year old mother of 3 at work was telling me how her girlfriends are all so excited about the movie, and how much she liked it. Heck, my cynical sister saw it twice, and will probably see it again. My dad loved it too.
 
GhaleonEB said:
They have added domestic, but not international from yesterday. They also show about $12m less international box office than Variety and Deadline Hollywood are reporting.

They usually update international grosses in the next few hours.
Click to expand...

Yeah those 12 should make up for the difference.

Btw I finished the game yesterday and boy could it have used quite a few more months of development.

Still, between the info on the game's and the online wiki's Pandorapedia, the depth of information and world-building is staggering. Seems like the only thing preventing us from achieving most of the tech on display (well, except the actual Avatar tech) is the energy source, because we have detailed specs for the rest. :lol
 
FirewalkR said:
Yeah those 12 should make up for the difference.

Btw I finished the game yesterday and boy could it have used quite a few more months of development.

Still, between the info on the game's and the online wiki's Pandorapedia, the depth of information and world-building is staggering. Seems like the only thing preventing us from achieving most of the tech on display (well, except the actual Avatar tech) is the energy source, because we have detailed specs for the rest. :lol
Click to expand...
You made me go check Pandorapedia to find that everything has been deleted. D:
 
Username of the person that's put up the message is " neytiri_3 "

d'awwww <3
 
How weird, my bro, who at first I thought enjoyed the movie, seems to have reversed his opinion. Now, he's pretty much against the film except for the visuals (and Quaritch). The funny thing is though, his biggest complaint was Jake, and how, in his interpretation, he came off as a big jerk/douche/prick/etc. That was kind of interesting to me because I have not heard that complaint about Jake at all, the main complaint being that his character was a vacuum devoid of much personality. His next big complaint was the awful preachiness of the film's message. I guess he had hoped for more of a True Lies kind of script in terms of writing.

Funny because he's a big District 9 fan, and because Wikus was probably the most definitive douchebag main character ever.
 
I logged in but seems like there's no "history" page.

Still, the actual info is still online, seems that it's just the main index page that's gone.
 
FirewalkR said:
Still, the actual info is still online, seems that it's just the main index page that's gone.
Click to expand...
You are correct sir! The individual pages are still there with the info:

http://www.pandorapedia.com/doku.php/us:na_vi
http://www.pandorapedia.com/doku.php/isv_venture_star
http://www.pandorapedia.com/doku.php/the_avatar_program
http://www.pandorapedia.com/doku.php/amp_suit_amplified_mobility_platform
http://www.pandorapedia.com/doku.php/dragon_gunship

Those are all I had in my Firefox history
 
DanielPlainview said:
thought I would share this with fellow Avatar fans, it made the list! put a ton of work into this, check it out:

Click to expand...

Return of the King is your top LOTR movie? Blargh.

Born Ultimatum but not Supremacy? BLARGH
 
ToxicAdam said:
No one laughed in my showing, but I had a father next to me tell his son to cover his eyes (when it looked like we were going to see some Na'vi hot sex). His son says "Why?!" Then the scene is quickly over and his Father says "Never mind".

I thought it was a hilarious exchange.
Click to expand...

Ah yes, so the child is mature enough to handle all the killing and violence that was in that movie, but not mature enough for a very short and brief matting scene.

Awesome movie btw.
 
Dax01 said:
Is this a list in which, for example, 99 is a better movie than 100 (and so on)?
Click to expand...

That would be the only reason to number them in a countdown.

Also, Big Fish is better than Return of the King which is better than Fellowship of the Ring and Munich? This is why I don't bother reading other people's lists.
 
StoOgE said:
Return of the King is your top LOTR movie? Blargh.

Born Ultimatum but not Supremacy? BLARGH
Click to expand...

Absolutely and absolutely. Will defend both of those completely.


Dax01 said:
Is this a list in which, for example, 99 is a better movie than 100 (and so on)?
Click to expand...

not so much, as you get deeper down the list it gets a little more important. Check out the intro for the best explanation.
 
Gui_PT said:
Ludicrous?
Click to expand...
2r3ft6h.jpg


Sounds about right.
 
I talked to my mom, about the movie yesterday, and she said it must of sucked for those actors to put on all tat blue make-up on all the time!:lol :lol
Also happy new years eve everyone!!!
 
neoism said:
I talked to my mom, about the movie yesterday, and she said it must of sucked for those actors to put on all tat blue make-up on all the time!:lol :lol
Also happy new years eve everyone!!!
Click to expand...

:lol Nice. The future is now. Did you explain it to her?
 
neoism said:
I talked to my mom, about the movie yesterday, and she said it must of sucked for those actors to put on all tat blue make-up on all the time!:lol :lol
Also happy new years eve everyone!!!
Click to expand...

Thats awesome. I am still trying to convince my dad to go. He's loved all of James Cameron's movies but he thinks this one looks cartoony. A lot of people thought this from the initial trailers and I think a lot of people are surprised when they actually see it, hence the strong word of mouth.
 
Onix said:
And with that, Cameron wins :D
Click to expand...
Yup. I was wondering the other day how many people were going to walk out of Avatar and not realize they'd just seen a mostly animated movie. I'm guessing quite a few.

My family is out of town tonight, and I'm starting to get bored. Might up and head to the next showing in a bit. Would be in Dolby 3D, but the closest RealD theater is an hour away (which is where I saw it before). So at least I'll be able to compare the projection tech.
 
bud said:
just came back from the theater. i had a blast--the story was fairly standard but the execution was outstanding.

i have to say, it looked way better than watching the trailer on my laptop. in nine ouf ten instances it looked very convincing, but there were some ehh parts--weaver's avatar was the only one, really, that always looked undeniably cg. i'm not sure what went wrong there.




that part didn't look cartoony at all in imax 3d. awesome.

zoe saldana was the highlight, personally speaking. terrific, convincing performance.

btw, at some point into the movie, you can totally hear worthington's australian accent. :lol

(rodriguez looked hot in that white tanktop)
Click to expand...
Yes I loove that night scene when they first met, personally for me, I think Jake, and Neytiri's character's looked the best through out the film. I seen nothing resembling cartoony!
I know they used 3D in a new why for this film, but how did they get the CGI to look sooo real, what did they do different from other films!???Also definitely agree, on Zoe, I reeeally hope she gets at least an Oscar nom!
 
GhaleonEB said:
Yup. I was wondering the other day how many people were going to walk out of Avatar and not realize they'd just seen a mostly animated movie. I'm guessing quite a few.

My family is out of town tonight, and I'm starting to get bored. Might up and head to the next showing in a bit. Would be in Dolby 3D, but the closest RealD theater is an hour away (which is where I saw it before). So at least I'll be able to compare the projection tech.
Click to expand...


You're hooked on Cameron's awesome juice
 
neoism said:
Yes I loove that night scene when they first met, personally for me, I think Jake, and Neytiri's character's looked the best through out the film. I seen nothing resembling cartoony!
I know they used 3D in a new why for this film, but how did they get the CGI to look sooo real, what did they do different from other films!???Also definitely agree, on Zoe, I reeeally hope she gets at least an Oscar nom!
Click to expand...


Cash+Moore's Law+WETA+ILM= magic.
 
Gui_PT said:
You're hooked on Cameron's awesome juice
Click to expand...
I will freely admit this. He got me with Titanic, too. :lol

I was originally planning to see it again on Saturday after I head into town for a shopping run. I might keep those plans too, we'll see.

By the balls, I tell you.
 
neoism said:
Yes I loove that night scene when they first met, personally for me, I think Jake, and Neytiri's character's looked the best through out the film. I seen nothing resembling cartoony!
I know they used 3D in a new why for this film, but how did they get the CGI to look sooo real, what did they do different from other films!???Also definitely agree, on Zoe, I reeeally hope she gets at least an Oscar nom!
Click to expand...

there was a preview for the new depp movie directed by burton and the 3d was so in your face and really gimmicky: ''oh, look, he's standing in front of him! ooooooooh.'' the 3d in avatar was more subtle.
 
I have seen it 3 times and will be seeing it a 4th tomorrow and I realized that I am still just as excited to see it as I was the first time. Cameron has created a movie that has a lot of replay value regardless of the familiar story. I just have such a fun experience with this movie and the way he executes it.
 
GhaleonEB said:
Yup. I was wondering the other day how many people were going to walk out of Avatar and not realize they'd just seen a mostly animated movie. I'm guessing quite a few.

My family is out of town tonight, and I'm starting to get bored. Might up and head to the next showing in a bit. Would be in Dolby 3D, but the closest RealD theater is an hour away (which is where I saw it before). So at least I'll be able to compare the projection tech.
Click to expand...
Don't forget to take your daughter! :lol
 
I was always curious why Grace's avatar looked so different from the others. Her nose is undeniably thinner; her eyes seem smaller, as do her ears.

Am I crazy, here?
 
bud said:
there was a preview for the new depp movie directed by burton and the 3d was so in your face and really gimmicky: ''oh, look, he's standing in front of him! ooooooooh.'' the 3d in avatar was more subtle.
Click to expand...
The 3D in Avatar was used mostly to accomplish a sense of depth, wasn't none of that IN YOUR FACE 3D typical gimmick.
 
WretchedTruman said:
I was always curious why Grace's avatar looked so different from the others. Her nose is undeniably thinner; her eyes seem smaller, as do her ears.

Am I crazy, here?
Click to expand...
Fictional explanation: she was the first successful avatar, and had a higher mix of human DNA compared to the later ones.

Director's explanation: Weaver's nose and upper face were so distinctive that when they "avatar'd" her, she didn't look anything like herself. So they scaled it back to make her recognizable.
Vic said:
The 3D in Avatar was use mostly to accomplish a sense of deep, wasn't none of that IN YOUR FACE 3D typical gimmick.
Click to expand...
Yeah, it was more about creating depth into the screen, not out of it. I can only think of a handful of instances where stuff was really pushed out into the audience.

The Alice trailer looked like the 3D was going to be repeatedly used in the most gimmicky ways possible.
 
GhaleonEB said:
I will freely admit this. He got me with Titanic, too. :lol

I was originally planning to see it again on Saturday after I head into town for a shopping run. I might keep those plans too, we'll see.

By the balls, I tell you.
Click to expand...

Don't blame you. I would've seen it more than once if I had the possibility.

Do me a favor. Every time you watch it again. Post a review here so I can dream about the movie please :D
 
Vic said:
The 3D in Avatar was used mostly to accomplish a sense of depth, wasn't none of that IN YOUR FACE 3D typical gimmick.
Click to expand...

indeed. the holographic screen fx in the control room were pretty cool.
 
bud said:
indeed. the holographic screen fx in the control room were pretty cool.
Click to expand...
As mentioned before, the glasses and windows looks so fucking great in Avatar/3D
 
The depth they were able to create with the 3D is what 3D movies from this point on need to use. Watching the Alice in Wonderland and Shrek trailers after seeing Avatar the first time were just typical boring ass in your face 3D. I don't want that anymore (dont know if I ever did) after seeing this movie. I hope most major action movies take lessons from Cameron, Weta, ILM, everyone involved in doing this.
 
Probably old news. But it's awesome to read anyway: http://www.deadline.com/hollywood/a...de-today-leads-total-500m-final-week-of-2009/
'Avatar' Crossed $800M Worldwide Today; Pic Leads Total $500M Final Week Of 2009; Year Ending +10% With Overall $10.6B
Who woulda thunk it? Adding Wednesday's estimated North American gross of $18.4M, Avatar's new domestic cume is now a staggering $268.8M after only 13 days in release. It's been averaging $18M a day. Overall, today's box office should be very good and tomorrow should be huge. Saturday and Sunday will then look normal. With 20th Century Fox conservatively anticipating this weekend's number in the $50M neighborhood, James Cameron's big budget technopic will be the #2 grossing film for 2009. "And there's a whole lot of gross still to come in 2010. This rocket ship still has loads of fuel in its tanks!" a Fox exec reminds me. Even rival studios tell me they expect Avatar to hit $335M by end of Sunday. "Cameron looks like he'll rank #1-#2 with Titanic," a Fox competitor emailed.

Avatar's international for Wednesday was $36.9M, down only 6% from Tuesday, making the foreign cume now $525.3M. So the worldwide total ending Wednesday was $794.1M. It has now crossed $800M today. Yowza!

So it's no wonder that, with today being the last box office opportunity of 2009, this final week will post record numbers with nearly $500 million in revenue generated from December 25 through December 31. Overall, 2009 is looking at $10.6 billion box office, up 10.07% from 2008. Hollywood numbers guru Paul Dergarabedian is also reporting that attendance figures are the highest in the past 5 years at 1.42 billion tickets sold at an average price of $7.46.
Click to expand...
 
Just got back from Avatar, packed house in there lol. Its amazing how many people are still going to see this movie! I thought it was GREAT. Totally blew away my expectations.
 
Brought my mother to see the movie earlier today and she absolutely loved it, despite her not usually being a Sci-Fi/Fantasy person.

Was funny to see how many times she was gasping during the film due to the scenery and spectacle. :lol

Was a sold out show as well.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

RIP Cora (my avatar)
46
790
gamingforum1 replied
Funk musician Sly Stone, 82, has passed away
11
579
GeekyDad replied
What's the deal with your avatar.
2 3
131
1K
Sand Dan Glokta replied
Brian Wilson Legendary founder of the Beach boys dies at 82
28
905
LiquidMetal14 replied
Avatar Error?
7
500
Nocty replied
Top Bottom