Avatar may be the front-runner for Best Picture at the Oscars this year its already been nominated for Golden Globes, Directors Guild, and Producer Guild awards but director-producer James Cameron isnt so sure hed be a welcome sight on the red carpet. After jumping up and making a fool of myself with my acceptance speech [for Titanic], Im sure nobody wants to see me at the Academy Awards again, he says. Or maybe they want me to win again to see if I can make an even bigger fool of myself. Even if he doesnt take home a statue, though, Avatars $1.3 billion grosses are already making him feel like King of the World. Let me put it this way, he says. All those naysayers, the nattering nabobs of negativity, the people who were saying the movie looks bad before theyd even seen anything you have to learn to ignore them. Thats something I learned on Titanic. But yeah, its satisfying that I was able to prove them all wrong.
Proving everyone wrong didnt come without an insane amount of hard work. Avatar took so many years of dedication that Cameron barely had time for swine flu. I took a half day off, he says. I took a day off about once every seven weeks, when I started slurring my words. I did get frustrated and cranky. But then one day, I just sort of bitch-slapped myself. I told myself, Youre fing rich. You dont have to do this. You could be off doing deep-sea exploration. So you better find a way to love it. The next day, I came to work whistling. I was slapping the grips on the back. It lasted till about noon.
Scullibundo said:DISCOVERY INTERVIEW WITH JAMES CAMERON
PART 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G-V1ulX7_Zc
PART 2:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BWqEmR_3bNA&feature=related
PART 3: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xubh8n5TWfw&feature=related
That is awesome.JC: "All those naysayers, the nattering nabobs of negativity..."
Now that is fucking awesome. :lol :lolJC: "Youre fing rich. You dont have to do this. You could be off doing deep-sea exploration. So you better find a way to love it."
jett said:You bitches are gonna look real stupid when the subtitles on the bluray prove you wrong.
:lolSolo said:Who a) gives a fuck about subtitles and b) watches movies in their native tongue with subs on? I dont give a rats ass what the subs may read, she is clearly saying "my Jake". Clean the shit out of your ears, ma'jett.
So, what scenes do you guys think he is referring to?Before it hit theaters, Avatar, which has amassed $1.3 billion at the worldwide box office, seemed to many in Hollywood like a crazy gamble. But not only did director James Cameron always believe that the film would be a hit he was even planning a sequel during production. Ive had a storyline in mind from the start there are even scenes in Avatar that I kept in because they lead to the sequel, Cameron says. It just makes sense to think of it as a two or three film arc, in terms of the business plan. The CG plants and trees and creatures and the musculo-skeletal rigging of the main characters that all takes an enormous amount of time to create. Itd be a waste not to use it again.
Dead said:http://popwatch.ew.com/2010/01/14/avatar-sequel-james-cameron/
So, what scenes do you guys think he is referring to?
Solo said:Who a) gives a fuck about subtitles and b) watches movies in their native tongue with subs on? I dont give a rats ass what the subs may read, she is clearly saying
"my Jake". Clean the shit out of your ears, ma'jett.
jett said:Preemptively accepting your pwnage, I see.
Scullibundo said:I didn't really look into the meaning of this post, so I'm just going to assume it conforms to everybody's argument against you.
or
Bout time you admitted you were wrong jett. Glad to see you take your medicine.
jett said:the fug
Scullibundo said:Already posted yesterday. And many people think its the opening shot.
adg1034 said:The flyover shot itself? Jake's VO on top of it? Which part, exactly?
Scullibundo said:Just pointing out the nature of a lot of your argumentative posts. Blanket posts that pretty much say 'I don't want to argue specifics, so I'll just assume that I've won this round.'
Correct, it mentions people began having dreams of forests, etc before pandora was found. Leading some (from the book) to think Eywa called out to us and put herself in danger in order to help Mother Earth.Scullibundo said:Yeah both, since he's been having dreams of flying. And I think in pandorapedia its reported a few people had dreams of flying before coming to Pandora.
IIRCryutaro's mama said:Out of curiosity, does anyone know what section of the movie was shown during the 18 minute preview of earlier last year?
I didn't get to go.![]()
Dead said:IIRC
- Part of the Quaritch intro
- Part of Jake taming his Banshee
- When Jake meets Neytiri
- Part of the Thanator chase I think
Theres more, but thats all I can remember
I kind of wish I hadn't gone to see it ever since seeing the movie.
yeah, you made the right choiceScullibundo said:Glad I resisted.
Dead said:IIRC
- Part of the Quaritch intro
- Part of Jake taming his Banshee
- When Jake meets Neytiri
- Part of the Thanator chase I think
Theres more, but thats all I can remember
I kind of wish I hadn't gone to see it ever since seeing the movie.
http://www.mtv.com/movies/news/articles/1629886/story.jhtmlBefore he makes the sequel, however, Cameron said he might step away from Pandora for a while. "There's some possibility of doing another film in between," explained the filmmaker, who has been absent from the awards-season scene since he similarly blew through it in 1997 with "Titanic." "But we'll certainly get busy talking about what the strategy is [for an 'Avatar' sequel], whether it makes sense to do it and laying any technical groundwork that needs to be done. These are big projects."
As for recent speculation over the leaked "Avatar" script that supposedly revealed extended intimacy between the film's lead characters, Cameron said he was getting a kick out of the chatter. "We took a good 10 seconds out of that scene. So people shouldn't [get too worked up over it]," he grinned. "I think it's one of those cases where the fantasy vastly exceeds the reality."
Still, fans can look for that scene and others in an upcoming DVD that Cameron is compiling, but one that he stopped short of labeling with a phrase we hear all too often. "The 'director's cut' is what we release," Cameron said. "What we do is we do a special edition, where you could select a longer version of the film that has some scenes reinstated. But it's really more of a fan version than a director's version.
"[The fan version] will be 10 or 12 minutes longer," he revealed. "Something like that."
If the "Avatar" sequel does happen, it'll be a few years before audiences can lay their 3D-glasses-enhanced eyes on it. Cameron is currently in pre-production on his next movie, "Battle Angel" in which he'll use some of the same CG technology he created for "Avatar." That film is slated to hit theaters in 2011.
"Always" is an exaggeration, he's been cagey about it. Of the couple dozen interviews I've seen and read, he's never said one way or the other. If he did in one other interview, I missed it. Though logistically it makes sense, since he has to draft the scripts and ramp the pre-production. I've been assuming he'd do The Dive as a breather between the big Avatar projects.Scullibundo said:Cameron was always going to do another film before the AVATAR sequel. I don't trust that as a source that its Battle Angel. But as soon as its announced I'll be there with condoms on.
And since then he's been dancing around it. Still, since I'm in the camp that does not want an Avatar sequel, I'm happy that something else will likely come first.Scullibundo said:There was an audio interview with Marketsaw about a month ago where he said he didn't want to launch into another 3-4 year project - which was his reasoning for saying it probably wouldn't be Battle Angel next and why it follows that it wouldn't really be AVATAR II either. Facial rigs don't take THAT long to make.
If its out of The Dive and Road to Hiroshima, I hope its the latter.
GhaleonEB said:And since then he's been dancing around it. Still, since I'm in the camp that does not want an Avatar sequel, I'm happy that something else will likely come first.
Though I really have no interest at all in the Hiroshima project.
ffffuuuuuck. In one interview you say 40 minutes of usable footage and in the next you say only 10-12 minutes longer. It better be the formerGhaleonEB said:Can't wait for my issue to show up, I used to pick Cinefex up regularly and it was always a fantastic read.
....
http://www.mtv.com/movies/news/articles/1629886/story.jhtml
Dead said:ffffuuuuuck. In one interview you say 40 minutes of usable footage and in the next you say only 10-12 minutes longer. It better be the former![]()
the fact that this is even a discussion is laughable. Hurt locker is brilliant art, not a schlocky special effects ridden fern gully remake.D23 said:the critics have spoken!
The Hurt Locker beat avatar in best picture of the year- critics choice awards
elrechazao said:the fact that this is even a discussion is laughable. Hurt locker is brilliant art, not a schlocky special effects ridden fern gully remake.
elrechazao said:the fact that this is even a discussion is laughable. Hurt locker is brilliant art, not a schlocky special effects ridden fern gully remake.