Why does every 80's property need a remake or a sequel? Comon Hollywood do something new.
This franchise will inevitably be rebooted at some point.
Why do posts like this always ignore all the films out there that are clearly doing new things and not reboots? So bizarre.
This is a thread about rebooting a classic 80's franchise, what the hell else is he going to talk about? Are you on crack? Is crack your primary dietary intake? Crack flakes? Pancracks? Peanut butter and crack?
Don't bring it up, ignore the thread, and watch something else instead? Seems like a silly thing to complain about and then top it off by saying "Hollywood do something new". They do... all the time.
I don't even like crack
Everytime Ghostbusters III is brought up, I have to:
1) Defend GB2 from the haters. This movie gets too much hate. I was watching it just the other day on Comedy Central and I was completely entertained by it.
And
2) The recent video game was very well done in every aspect. The story was interesting. The characters were accurately portrayed. The acting was decent considering none of the cast is really familiar with voice acting. Bill Murray has done Fantastic Mr. Fox and Garfield, Dan Aykroyd did Yogi Bear. Ernie Hudson and Annie Potts have a fairly decent VO background though. Production value was great too. I don't understand why people think a 3rd film would be a complete train wreak when the game was able to navigate the movie license video game curse just fine.
Agree with 1. Strongly disagree with 2. Game was subpar.
I love both movies and thought the game was great... would love a sequel video game if we don't get a movie.
Again... Ignoring the vast amount of movies out there.
Henchmen21 said:Agree with 1. Strongly disagree with 2. Game was subpar.