Genesis Knight
Member
One thing never changes about these threads: there's always a bunch of people who think that consoles run on the same $20-a-pop RAM their desktops at home run on.
Aye, no way MS will go Blu-ray.MarkMclovin said:Obviously?
MarkMclovin said:2gb of RAM should be fine.
I'm more interested on finding out what optical drive that'll be used.
Genesis Knight said:One thing never changes about these threads: there's always a bunch of people who think that consoles run on the same $20-a-pop RAM their desktops at home run on.
Genesis Knight said:One thing never changes about these threads: there's always a bunch of people who think that consoles run on the same $20-a-pop RAM their desktops at home run on.
nahGlamFM said:HD DVD. Honestly makes perfect sense.
Genesis Knight said:One thing never changes about these threads: there's always a bunch of people who think that consoles run on the same $20-a-pop RAM their desktops at home run on.
Even ordering billions of chips wouldn't decrease mainboard space and complexity issues, heat dissipation requirements or power consumption.AshMcCool said:No I don't. But If MS orders tens of Millions of those fuckers that can't be much more espensive for them.
Yeah, I don't think that MS is crazy enough to generate a massive recalling again. They will be more messured I think.wsippel said:Even ordering billions of chips wouldn't decrease mainboard space and complexity issues, heat dissipation requirements or power consumption.
BurntPork said:Yeah, but scaling down to that pathetic amount of power would still be an issue. It might be fine for a year two, and even after that it'll still get the Sonics and the MegaMans and the Batmans and whatever other less-demanding games are made, but things like Battlefield or Souls or Metal Gear or GTA or main series Resident Evil? The big games that really matter still won't have Wii U versions because the graphics downgrade would just be too much.
dat heat
AshMcCool said:No I don't. But If MS orders tens of Millions of those fuckers that can't be much more espensive for them.
ThoseDeafMutes said:My desktop at home runs on DDR3, as per this rumor. So does everybody else here. The standard excuse for lowballing RAM in consoles is that the consoles use low latency, high bandwidth specialist RAM rather than the cheaply mass produced DDR3 that we use in our PCs. According to this rumor that isn't true, and suddenly it becomes extremly viable to stick 4 or 8 GB into your console at low cost.
thepotatoman said:Well is it different then? Why don't you inform us instead of being a snide jerk about it.
wsippel said:Even ordering billions of chips wouldn't decrease mainboard space and complexity issues, heat dissipation requirements or power consumption.
This is Microsoft and Ballmer we're talking about.BruiserBear said:I would be very surprised if they announced this at CES.
specialguy said:This rumor is ridiculous. Like I said, the idea of "dual GPU" alone makes it completely obviously false. The other obvious falsity is the timeframe, CES would not be the debut venue regardless, and 2012 is out of the question.
GAF's penchant for swallowing every annoying Xbox rumor is well, annoying.
That said, I guess at least these rumors contain a machine with some actual beef, making it a little less ludicrous.
Rumours put Wii U on 3-core multithreaded POWER7 based CPU, 1+ GB of RAM, and a reasonably powerful ATI GPU. Pretty much half the console that's described by these rumours. It seems Nintendo is maxing out what is possible for a given box and price. Microsoft can't magically do much better. Anyway, consoles that are in the same league with similar architecture are gonna see ports all the time.RedSwirl said:I still don't see why you guys think this?
DCKing said:Rumours put Wii U on 3-core multithreaded POWER7 based CPU, 1+ GB of RAM, and a reasonably powerful ATI GPU. Pretty much half the console that's described by these rumours. It seems Nintendo is maxing out what is possible for a given box and price. Microsoft can't magically do much better. Anyway, consoles that are in the same league with similar architecture are gonna see ports all the time.
If these rumours have any truth in them (which I don't think) however, it seems to me that it's actually an AMD Fusion hexacore CPU with onboard GPU as well as an external GPU for some extra power. AMD CPUs and some relatively high-end GPUs are already built with a DDR3 memory controller, so that explains the memory configuration as well. If anything this would be devkit hardware though, not final stuff. That's the only way that this is not complete BS.
GlamFM said:CES would be a great place to start talking about it - with a full reveal an E3 few month later.
Actually I think it´s how the 360 was introduced as well.
I don't think that FreeMufasa was being exactly accurate with that comparison heh.RedSwirl said:So if everything is legit so far, the difference will be like between the PS2 and Original Xbox? What is that in Dragonball terms? The Wii-U thread says that's like the difference between Captain Ginyu and Stage 2 Frieza but that's a pretty big gap if you ask me.
Router said:The article says 2GB for CPU. Not 2GB total memory anyway.
Or am I reading it wrong?
I'm thinking more 4670 than 4870. MAYBE 4770 or 5750.Sho_Nuff82 said:SMH, who's going to be designing these games that are a full generation beyond a ~4870's display capabilities? For $20 million?
I can't imagine why MS would go with a 6-core, dual-GPU monster and throw in $15 of the worst RAM on the market. Could they be going with a PC-like setup with a near equivalent GDDR5 pool on the cards?
Sho_Nuff82 said:dual-GPU monster
thepotatoman said:Well is it different then? Why don't you inform us instead of being a snide jerk about it.
Dragon said:I think people thinking: "oh they can just add 2 gigs more of RAM, it's only five bucks on Amazon" are missing the point. MIcrosoft isn't going to use consumer level RAM in their next gen system. So 2 gigs will end up being more than five bucks per console.
Anyway, if this rumor is correct we only have to wait a few months to hear about this at CES.
iceatcs said:Gotta love the fact how much difference thread between this one and ARM CPU rumour.
ARM CPU made lot people crazy. This one was little better but 2GB nerve them.
So people still want more powerful, not bother ensure to be success market.
The ram people mainly say this about, are not DDR3, I suppose.Dragon said:I think people thinking: "oh they can just add 2 gigs more of RAM, it's only five bucks on Amazon" are missing the point. MIcrosoft isn't going to use consumer level RAM in their next gen system. So 2 gigs will end up being more than five bucks per console.
Anyway, if this rumor is correct we only have to wait a few months to hear about this at CES.
BurntPork said:How is having twice as many cores and twice as much RAM good for Wii U? This news assures that Wii U will not have better support than Wii. Seems like MS's goal is to max-out hype before Wii U is even truly unveiled.
The dual GPU is likely just for the dev kit. This thing is going to be a beast. Still not sure if I want it, though.
Dragon said:I think people thinking: "oh they can just add 2 gigs more of RAM, it's only five bucks on Amazon" are missing the point. MIcrosoft isn't going to use consumer level RAM in their next gen system. So 2 gigs will end up being more than five bucks per console.
Anyway, if this rumor is correct we only have to wait a few months to hear about this at CES.
So in 6 years they'll release a new Xbox?SomeDude said:What do you think pc games will look like 6 years from now? All xbox fans should protest this insanity.
pottuvoi said:In terms of using memory it still is, I have yet to see a game on consoles with ~100-1000 AI entities which interact with each others in a game world.
Shadow of the BEAST said:eh no. Ms is guaranteed to pay alot less than any consumer is, regardless what they are ordering.