BlazinSkatinAxel
Member
That racism dying off.No surprises here. My parents live in super rural central NY and the smallest towns are basically ghost towns.
That racism dying off.No surprises here. My parents live in super rural central NY and the smallest towns are basically ghost towns.
Sure but the fundamental problem is population basedThe more federally funded program that existed, the better off losing regions would be in situations like this
This attitude is poisonous, and it contributes significantly to the growing polarization against the liberal establishment in rural areas. They're not stupid, and they can see the paternalism and contempt emanating from elite power centers.
It blows my mind how common it is to hear things like this from people who claim to be from the party of compassion.
Yeah, can't even run a govt elder care program if a local population doesn't have enough potential caregivers.Sure but the fundamental problem is population based
There are Rural Americans who didn't vote Trump, and Rural Americans who aren't bigots.
Nobody offers compassion unconditionally, probably not even you. You want that, maybe visit a monastery. The rest of the world is give and take.
But that's my whole point. THOSE people are still Rural America. We even have progressive gaffers from Rural America.I feel for these people, and I want them to succeed economically. I want them to escape these rural hell holes. Hell, before this election, I wanted the people I didn't politically agree with to succeed as well because that is the decent human empathetic thing to want for all people. But after these fucks made it clear they want to harm my child who has a disability out of spite for "libruls", those latter mother fuckers can waste away for all I care. They made it personal, not me.
I still hope those who didn't wish for this find a way to escape and join the better half of America.
I honestly don't have a short term answer, and it sucks. I just want people to remember that. There are people who don't "need to be convinced" who live out in Rural counties. Those people (like yourself) just seem like victims of this situation, through and through.Of course there are. But how do you help people who are in deep Red counties in deep Red states in a currently Red country? People want to help them, Clinton wanted to help them, Bernie wanted to help them, Obama wanted to help them etc, etc. But the deeper you are in the midst and in the power of people that want to burn your life down, it's hard to reach you, you know?
It's like a drowning man who starts flailing and drags his rescuer down with him not like someone pissing on you when you're on fire.
I'm kinda in that situation myself here in WV tbh
Growing up in rural Oregon I am seeing the baby boomer generation die off to health problems from a lifetime of drug/alcohol/tobacco use. Larger farming conglomerates take over the properties and the children move to sub/urban areas. It is just the inevitable path society has taken.
The implied alternative, that sympathy is earned by voting for the correct political party, seems pretty morally abhorrent to me.
I was wondering if big business would just buy up the land as people die, using it for MegaFarms(tm) or heck, doing nothing with it to make sure city real estate prices stay high? Play the long game.
It is possible for Dems to campaign on tax cuts for the middle class and tax reform that help small businesses. That is something Obama and many other Democrats talked about often actually.
I was wondering if big business would just buy up the land as people die, using it for MegaFarms(tm) or heck, doing nothing with it to make sure city real estate prices stay high? Play the long game.
I was wondering if big business would just buy up the land as people die, using it for MegaFarms(tm) or heck, doing nothing with it to make sure city real estate prices stay high? Play the long game.
The implied alternative, that sympathy is earned by voting for the correct political party, seems pretty morally abhorrent to me.
Edit: and even then, as noted above, you're still throwing up to 49 percent of these areas under the bus because of the aggregate decision of the population as a whole.
citation needed
Nah, you're not gonna frame the argument on those bullshit terms. Sympathy is reciprocated when one shows some consideration for more than one's own egotistical predicament. I thought I was being a good guy when I voted in their best interests, despite not walking in their shoes. Too bad they can't manage to do the same for themselves, I guess? If I accept your premise that these people are not stupid, am I supposed to keep feeling bad for people who can feel heat and still choose to walk into fire?
We are winning people to our side, but they're not in rural areas, because those people refuse to vote for Dems.This is...actually exactly what I'm talking about. Smug tribalism won't win anyone to your side. And if you're not concerned with winning people to your side, you're not interested in building any kind of political power.
I hope your self-righteousness is some comfort to you when we get president Dog the Bounty Hunter in 2020.
I mean rural America votes for the party that doesn't want to invest, or even reduce investments. It's hard to find too much sympathy
This is...actually exactly what I'm talking about. Smug tribalism won't win anyone to your side. And if you're not concerned with winning people to your side, you're not interested in building any kind of political power.
I hope your self-righteousness is some comfort to you when we get president Dog the Bounty Hunter in 2020.
What exactly do you want from us? We offer them help for years and they slap us with Trump. Now they're okay with their elected leaders lying about easily proved shit, attacking journalists, and full-on corruption. Why should we be nice to people who go out of their way to hurt us?
But that's my whole point. THOSE people are still Rural America. We even have progressive gaffers from Rural America.
I have zero intention of making some bullshit "few bad apples" analogy, because yes most of Rural America will vote R. But don't forget about those Rural Americans who are effectively trapped. Think how much it has to fucking suck for them?
I don't want Rural American to become synonymous with Bigot.
Here's one of the great graphs from the article:
Why the huge across the board drop from 06 to 16?
Are we getting to Europe levels of not reproducing ourselves already?
Absolutely. Fully sympathetic to their plight, but elections have consequences. They needed to vote for better candidates and policies.I am 100% fine with us dedicating more resources towards supporting people in these communities but they need to vote for people who stand for supporting resources in these communities
Great Recession.Why the huge across the board drop from 06 to 16?
Are we getting to Europe levels of not reproducing ourselves already?
No surprises here. My parents live in super rural central NY and the smallest towns are basically ghost towns.
No one wants to live there because it isn't openly available to access.There's no land shortage in the US; on the contrary, there are millions and millions of acres that sit around entirely unused that you could buy for scraps if you were so inclined. But why would you? No one wants to live there.
Yep... no sympathy here. About time rural America feels the consequence of continually voting against their best interests.
So rural America is the pits while urban America like San Francisco is unaffordable.
Both Americas have failed.
No. '08 recession.
Great Recession.
It's getting worse in most of them due to NIMBYism - Seattle's a big exception on that front. San Fran's an outlier (along w/ NYC) due to the land area issues.San Fran is a bit of an exception. Most major cities have affordable homes/places.
Yep. Rural America is in for a rude awakening when their orange king does nothing for them.
Wow, it had that big of an impact? Was it from people having less kids, or more people dying?
I am 100% fine with us dedicating more resources towards supporting people in these communities but they need to vote for people who stand for supporting resources in these communities
I mean rural America votes for the party that doesn't want to invest, or even reduce investments. It's hard to find too much sympathy
It's getting worse in most of them due to NIMBYism - Seattle's a big exception on that front. San Fran's an outlier (along w/ NYC) due to the land area issues.
We are winning people to our side, but they're not in rural areas, because those people refuse to vote for Dems.
Wow it really is the new "inner city" SMH
This is...actually exactly what I'm talking about. Smug tribalism won't win anyone to your side. And if you're not concerned with winning people to your side, you're not interested in building any kind of political power.
I hope your self-righteousness is some comfort to you when we get president Dog the Bounty Hunter in 2020.
There are legitimate reasons to despise many stripes of Republican voters. But I'm specifically addressing the particular rhetorical move that says people deserve to be immiserated because they live in a red district.
Rural != Poor. Trump's voters were generally better off, they just don't live in cities!I'm not sure what the motivation behind this post is, but I agree in a sense: prejudice against poor whites is fast becoming as acceptable on the Democratic side as prejudice against poor minorities is on the Republican.
The fact is, we literally can't do anything to help them if they keep voting for people who are intent on burning the country down.
You can't do anything to help them anyways. Rural america /is/ dying, and there's nothing anyone can do to stop it. The only thing we can do is make the transition to mass urbanization more harmonious.
You can't do anything to help them anyways. Rural america /is/ dying, and there's nothing anyone can do to stop it. The only thing we can do is make the transition to mass urbanization more harmonious.
That racism dying off.