It is tl;dr, but I did catch this snippit.
A barrel is currently trading at $104/barrel. I wonder if that would alter his conclusion
Stuff like liquefied natural gas (LNG) and shale gas have increased competition and kept prices in check.Speaking of which, what happened to the price of gas?
I remember when I was a kid, back in the early 2000's, my parents talked about what would happen if gas ever hit $100 a barrel and the horrible things that would happen.
I remember other people talking about that as well, any reason why doomsday never came to pass?
Russia are actually getting a pretty poor deal out of this; they'll be selling the stuff at a loss for 3-4 years and they've got to spend about 40-50 billion building the pipeline first.
Russia will probably sign a similar deal with India as well. Potentialy with South Korea as well. They are rapidly strenghtining the BRICS Central Asian axis. There's a good chance they'll be launching the BRICS equivalent of World Bank this year with $100b which will be the beginning of creation of a system which will be parallel to US dominated Bretton Woods system. Russia is playing the long game.
Rule number of Western apologists and their media:
1. Every country that opposes the United States aggressiveness has an economy that is in shambles.
There is nothing like "taking over at the right time", an economy is only as good as the leadership of the country. The fact remains that he steered the country towards prosperity, 1998 didn't become suddenly more favorable than 1997.
To the average person it might as well be. I was born and raised there and have family still there. Russians are not doing that well. All that GDP money is going to a select few.
This is the most important part of the deal. China is moving to the next step in talking about security agreements between the BRICSs, which are making moves to "de-dollarize" the world. This will all have irreversible effects for the dollar, and the US can't rely on mystery buyers in Belgium picking up the now less desired treasuries, as they have been since tapering began.
It's a new century, and I think it belongs to the new Eurasia.
Completely false. Average real incomes have skyrocketed since Putin became president. This is a statistical fact.
.
I was not arguing that things haven't improved under Putin. Skyrocketing from an abysmal level doesn't necessarily mean you're well off at the end.
The average income in Russia is about 17k (USD) a year, lower than the OECD average of 23k. The wealth gap is huge and Russia is basically an oligarchy.
I was not arguing that things haven't improved under Putin. Skyrocketing from an abysmal level doesn't necessarily mean you're well off at the end.
The average income in Russia is about 17k (USD) a year, lower than the OECD average of 23k. The wealth gap is huge and Russia is basically an oligarchy.
Western Australia is shitting itself
Yeah.Russia has a more equitable wealth distribution than for example US or China and is roughly the same as Japan (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_distribution_of_wealth). Are all thos countries oligarchies?
Just imagine China + Russia in space. Is more effective than 1000 episodes of Cosmos. The good times are coming back.
All their actions have taken place in places the US is officially neutral in. They are not anywhere as provocative as Russian actions, which haven't hurt Russia much anyway.
Chinese actions have still not fostered further ASEAN integration, and it has in fact heightened their differences as their rising nationalism moves them away from further ASEAN integration. Many of these countries aren't united because they're bickering over the same islands as well.
Fostering cooperation amongst ASEAN would've just led to a regional bloc to challenge China, many of whom already had strong relations with the US. Playing them off one another has been much more successful.
If China does not seek a war, then it's actions have been successful; having regional neighbors and the US expend more money on military budgets is a reasonable cost. I don't see any of the nations wanting to go to war over rocks in the sea that the US is officially neutral on, especially with their dependence on the Chinese economy.
Cost of living is actually very high compared to incomes. It's not easy to live over there.That figure is meaningless without looking at the cost of living in Russia.
I feel more at ease in a multipolar world.
The economy of any country that stands up to the US happens to be in shambles.
There is nothing like "taking over at the right time", an economy is only as good as the leadership of the country. The fact remains that he steered the country towards prosperity, 1998 didn't become suddenly more favorable than 1997.
This is the most important part of the deal. China is moving to the next step in talking about security agreements between the BRICSs, which are making moves to "de-dollarize" the world. This will all have irreversible effects for the dollar, and the US can't rely on mystery buyers in Belgium picking up the now less desired treasuries, as they have been since tapering began.
It's a new century, and I think it belongs to the new Eurasia.
Nothing you said disagrees with what I said. The South China Sea issue divides ASEAN--besides the countries that are allied with China, many of the countries are also bickering amongst themselves for the islands and dispute over sea borders.I would say otherwise. Each ASEAN country is far too small, economy and military wise. The only way to fight back with China is only integration. Somehow it doesn't come into full effect yet because China has hold some poor ASEAN country ball (Burma, Laos, Cambodia). And ASEAN has the rule of not agree on anything if one of the member country make objection (which surely that 3 countries will object the joint ASEAN military program in a favour of China).
BTW, China is playing a dangerous game here. All of their neibourhood allies are small and poor. So they practically has nobody to support apart from themself. Imagine the war between China and the rest of Asia (with support from US). That would be very interesting.
Cost of living is actually very high compared to incomes. It's not easy to live over there.
Always did, on paper. Like clockwork, heh. A little worried if some previous owners attempt to pay it a visit or create grounds for a custody battle.It's a new century, and I think it belongs to the new Eurasia.
Always did, on paper. Like clockwork, heh. A little worried if some previous owners attempt to pay it a visit or create grounds for a custody battle.
Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs Kurt Campbell spoke with FPI Director Robert Kagan on the Obama administration’s strategic “pivot” from the Middle East to East Asia.
Campbell began by saying that the countries of the Asian-Pacific recognize that while the dominant issues of the 21st century will be decided in that region, the United States was still in the initial stages its engagement there.
China’s recent naval aggressions in the South China Sea, the US marine deployment in Darwin, the deepening and expanded alliance between US and Australia, and the responsibility and role of Australians in pushing back against this alarming militarization of the region.
Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) free trade agreement is being negotiated in Singapore this week between Australia, New Zealand, the US, Peru, Chile, Mexico, Canada, Singapore, Brunei, Malaysia, Vietnam and Japan.
Prime minister Tony Abbott and defence minister David Johnston announced on Wednesday that the government would acquire 58 more of the F-35 jets by 2023, bringing the fleet to 72, with an option to purchase another 28 in the next few years.
The $12.4bn price tag makes it one of the biggest defence purchases in Australia’s history and includes maintenance, weapons and upgrading of facilities in Australia.
China’s president called Tuesday for the creation of a new Asian structure for security cooperation based on a regional group that includes Russia and Iran and excludes the U.S.
Yep, its the Asia Pivot.
Found most of this out listening to Corbett Report, yes he's known as a "conspiracy theorist" but what he talked about 2-3 years ago is playing out now.
Western Australia is shitting itself
Yeah. Most realise even if the say they don't. It's right there. Nature innit, I think--probably the feelz in the wind lol. No escape because we never have--blind to the bind. Those in power are likely powerless to stop it. Growth and decay; for the economists;D
Twistier than a twisty turny thing--it'll traverse the difference. Stand (pile bodies) in the way, back room deal or yknow-- atyourownrisk. Only way to win could be to lose. At least we have Pharrel And tea.
I for one welcome our new Eurasian overlords.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cc5wkQm6B44Yeah. Most realise even if the say they don't. It's right there. Nature innit, I think--probably the feelz in the wind lol. No escape because we never have--blind to the bind. Those in power are likely powerless to stop it. Growth and decay; for the economists;D
Twistier than a twisty turny thing--it'll traverse the difference. Stand (pile bodies) in the way, back room deal or yknow-- atyourownrisk. Only way to win could be to lose. At least we have Pharrel And tea.
If anything I'd prefer China over Russia. Am I wrong?Onward China, on Kazakhstan, on Iran, onward Russia!
The fact that you think life would be any better under a hemisphere under the control of Eurasian autocracies than western Europe and the US automatically makes me assume that you're a greasy 19 year old wearing an edgy anarchy shirt with a stack of Nietzsche and comic books on your desk.
If anything I'd prefer China over Russia. Am I wrong?
Russia will probably sign a similar deal with India as well. Potentialy with South Korea as well. They are rapidly strenghtining the BRICS Central Asian axis. There's a good chance they'll be launching the BRICS equivalent of World Bank this year with $100b which will be the beginning of creation of a system which will be parallel to US dominated Bretton Woods system. Russia is playing the long game.
It's all about the quality of life. If your people have a shitty life, then the size of your economy really doesn't matter.
If anything I'd prefer China over Russia. Am I wrong?
This map is inaccurate in that its smallest unit are nations rather than smaller more localized units. I assure you that there are people living better in Hong Kong than the middle of Mississippi.
The picture does make for great propaganda though.
cray? A fish in sea? Bingo.cray cray
Portrait Mode. Damage +99. Ouchy, mah pride and mah eyez!
The two biggest winners in this is America that is going to try to (and likely will) take Russia's place as Europe's number 1 natural gas Energy dealer and China that got a great deal on the price of Energy from Russia.