• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Samuel L. Jackson talks M. Night Shyamalan

Status
Not open for further replies.
Jackie Brown is a great movie, but it does feel very similar in tone to Pulp Fiction. So it's not a sequel, but it's got that same feel.
 

John Dunbar

correct about everything
based on that bit the interviewer is terrible. "Signs was OK", "I thought it was OK", "People liked X", what the fuck.
 

Escape Goat

Member
based on that bit the interviewer is terrible. "Signs was OK", "I thought it was OK", "People liked X", what the fuck.

It was more of a conversation than an interview.

HAHAHAHAHA...yeah...no... There was a multi-page thread about the After Earth trailer and all he posted were pr posts with links to youtube.

He should have hired Expendable.
 

AColdDay

Member
The greatest twist is going to happen in the far future, when the people of the future determine that "The Last Airbender" was a landmark film, due to a labeling error saying that it was made and released in 1976 and therefore deducing that it inspired every subsequent film in history.
 

FairyD

Member
I really had high hopes for M. Night Shyamalan. After Unbreakable and Sixth Sense you could see he had talent.

Also, fuck anyone that says Jackie Brown isn't awesome.
 

DonasaurusRex

Online Ho Champ
Considering Sam Jackson starred in Whitta's Book of Eli, he may be in an M Night film sooner rather than later if a Whitta-Night partnership develops.

holy shit black people must really all look the same to you...or im missing something HUGE in the book of eli....jk im sure it was an honest...mix up i guess...lol
 
Sounds like he already thought he wasn't. Shymalan doesn't seem to do sequels or work with his actors again. Bruce Willis worked with him twice, and that's all I know. I think that's the rub of what Sam was getting at.

Contrast that with Tarantino, who seems to have some actor loyalty, and frequently recasts from movie to movie.
What? He worked with Jaiquin Phoenix twice too.
 

grendelrt

Member
Considering Sam Jackson starred in Whitta's Book of Eli, he may be in an M Night film sooner rather than later if a Whitta-Night partnership develops.

He aint mad enough to be Sam
220px-Book_of_eli_poster.jpg
 

artist

Banned
He's right when he says Unbreakable 2 announcement would make news. People saying BS just dont know what they're talking about.
 

msdstc

Incredibly Naive
Love Sam, but he may have went a bit too far. I agree with everything he says, but there's a time and a place.
 

shira

Member
He's right when he says Unbreakable 2 announcement would make news. People saying BS just dont know what they're talking about.

There is no room for ANOTHER superhero movie. And there is already enough spoof/realistic comics too.

What studio would do it? Warner/Fox/Sony/Disney all got their franchises.
 
That's a very honest and sound analysis. I'd love to hear him break loose on the Star Wars prequels. Not because I hate them but because you can tell he really know his stuff and can stay grounded and detached to provide an honest critique.

EDIT: Oh shiet. He does talk Star Wars. Off to read.

EDIT2: Well He clearly liked the prequels otherwise he wouldn't want to be in the new ones. I agree Mace should have survived. In my mind he did :)
 

msdstc

Incredibly Naive
There is no room for ANOTHER superhero movie. And there is already enough spoof/realistic comics too.

What studio would do it? Warner/Fox/Sony/Disney all got their franchises.

The point is regardless of the studio, it would make news.
 
Well I enjoyed the Village a lot. Unbreakable 2 would be a dream. Shamylan has an impressive resume as a whole, but Lady in the Water and the Happening really turned me off. I couldn't finish Last Air Bender.
 

black_13

Banned
One thing M. Night has on everyone including Tarantino is that his movies are almost always really original. They may not be good but they are very unique/original.

While Tarantino picks a favorite genre of his and mashes it up to make a movie.

Now is Tarantino a better director/movie maker? No doubt about it but M. Night is still better than the 99% of other shit directors in Hollywood.
 
Although I don't tend to hate Shyamalan as much as most people, I love Jackson, and I love the fact that he's just talking casually in an interview.

I really liked Signs. I understand the issues people had with it, but I just love living through that entire ordeal with that family. I felt like he nailed that aspect of it.

I like The Village pretty much until the twist...

LitW was him feeling himself WAY to much. I sorta like the idea behind it (Modern Fairy Tale I guess?), but man oh man did he have some Lucas type shit in that.

The Happening is one of the all time great comedies. It's up there with Nicolas Cage's Wicker Man.
 

Dabanton

Member
I met M Night in London when The Village came out

I asked him about a sequel to Unbreakable. He said it was something he had an outline for. Wish he'd do it.
 

iirate

Member
Unbreakable sequels would be HORRIBLE. It needs to stand alone

I love this movie and mostly agree. It wouldn't have to be HORRIBLE, but I don't see it as this great tragedy that it'll never happen.

If a good movie works on its own, there's no need to mourn the unborn follow-ups.
 

maharg

idspispopd
I think M. Night gets too caught up on having to have a twist.

I've always found this kind of weird. Sixth Sense and Unbreakable had twists. I guess The Village did too. But otherwise, his films really didn't have them. Sometimes you read people talking about Signs or Lady in the Water or even The Happening about how stupid the twist was and... no shit, there was no twist. I'm not sure it was so much Shyamalan who got caught up in the idea of twists as it was the audience when they saw his name.

Not that I'm defending the quality of his later work. It was definitely largely downhill for him. The Happening and TLA in particular are pretty much indefensible. But Sixth Sense in particular will always have been fantastic.
 
Am I the only one who figured out "I see dead people" in the first 10 minutes? I never knew what the big deal about that film was.

I know a lot of people got that twist, but I was not one of them.

However, what makes that a great movie isn't the twist at all. It's the fucking tragedy of Bruce Willis' character. M. Night fixated on the wrong aspect, because that's what everybody talked about.
 

thetrin

Hail, peons, for I have come as ambassador from the great and bountiful Blueberry Butt Explosion
I absolutely loved Unbreakable. I haven't liked a Shyamalan movie since then. It's really unfortunate. I would have loved another Unbreakable.
 
Which movie is this?
"Killing Them Softly." It didn't quite happen. And going nowhere! You can do that, but you've got to go somewhere. That's the marvelous thing about Quentin: his movies are talky as all hell, but it's shit you want to hear.

I think Sam Jackson needs to rewatch Deathproof.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom