Sarkeesian cancels speech after mass-shooting threat due to cop refusing to ban gun

Status
Not open for further replies.
What "methods" of hers don't you approve of?

I'm genuinely curious.

I'm not going to derail this thread by getting into a protracted discussion about her videos. I was active in the threads about her videos if you want to go back and look what I wrote.
 
Can people please stop associating gamergate with these psychos?
I've gotten several threats over tumblr for being a cis male but somehow I manage not to blame the entire female and trans population for a tiny handful of crazies and probable trolls.
 
"Gamergate" doesn't represent anything. It's trumped-up bullshit based on a conspiracy that never happened perpetuated by morons who think polygon and kotaku are actual respected "journalism" sites and that they're on some sort of righteous crusade for pointing out that they write bad articles, while a legion of assholes make threats and various sexist bullshit while hiding behind the tag. It's inherently tainted from its very origin, so why not make an actual movement rather than trying to redeem the joke that is "gamergate?"

This I agree with entirely.
 
I've gotten several threats over tumblr for being a cis male but somehow I manage not to blame the entire female and trans population for a tiny handful of crazies and probable trolls.

The funny thing about GamerGate is that association with it is completely voluntary
 
Fuck the Supreme Court forever for distorting the Second Amendment into something it neither states nor implies.
 
What "methods" of hers don't you approve of?

I'm genuinely curious.

Personally I'm not really a fan of the small snippet internet video criticism as it tends to hit at low hanging fruit and doesn't really get into the deep issues the way a long form article can. I watched the first Tropes vs VG and then I moved on because it wasn't for me.
 
I'm curious as to whether a private venue in the town was considered after this issue was conveyed to the parties. Obviously that would require non university sponsorship and thus an expense to someone, perhaps prohibitive. I personally think it sends a better message to this asshole to shift the venue rather than just folding.
 
Personally I'm not really a fan of the small snippet internet video criticism as it tends to hit at low hanging fruit and doesn't really get into the deep issues the way a long form article can. I watched the first Tropes vs VG and then I moved on because it wasn't for me.

Which is a fine criticism. I actually agree with it, to the extent that you're right there's not a lot of depth there. But then, Tropes vs Women was never really meant to be in depth analysis from the start. Its just an introduction, a primer, an attempt to get the conversation going (which according to some developers it has)
 
I hope not. Her voice is important to gaming culture.

Yes. Like her or not it is very important that she is allowed to speak.

For people who tend to get confused about this definition: being unable to speak due to actual threats of violence against your person and your audience is what actual censorship looks like

Yeah and it's scary. Death threats to public speakers are a real threat to freedom of speech.
 
I've gotten several threats over tumblr for being a cis male but somehow I manage not to blame the entire female and trans population for a tiny handful of crazies and probable trolls.

The funny thing about GamerGate is that association with it is completely voluntary

Maybe it's so easy to get attacks on GamerGate mixed up with attacks on "the entire male population" because, at its core, GamerGate is really about men vs. women instead of whatever bullshit "journnalism ethics" nonsense is the pretense.

All these people here attacking anyone who dislikes her while talking about the dangers censoring of free speech.

Ironic
You need to learn what censorship means.
 
I've gotten several threats over tumblr for being a cis male but somehow I manage not to blame the entire female and trans population for a tiny handful of crazies and probable trolls.

The term #gamergate was coined by Adam Baldwin who has used the controversies to state some pretty shitty things. I haven't seen much from the "movement" to think they've moved very far from that poor birthing.



Also, Adam Baldwin is a twat.

All these people here attacking anyone who dislikes her while talking about the dangers censoring of free speech.

Ironic

It's ironic in that same way that rain on your wedding day is ironic? Because no one's freedom of speech is being violated.
 
Which is a fine criticism. I actually agree with it, to the extent that you're right there's not a lot of depth there. But then, Tropes vs Women was never really meant to be in depth analysis from the start. Its just an introduction, a primer, an attempt to get the conversation going (which according to some developers it has)

In that regard, the series has succeeded. I don't really enjoy her videos at all, but they've definitely started a conversation about the roles of women in video games, which is a good thing, regardless of the quality of her content.
 
Can people please stop associating gamergate with these psychos?

If tomorrow I read that death threats are coming in threatening people who eat chicken on behalf of those that eat hotdogs, I am not going to be sickened with hot dog eaters.

Anyone who thinks that this is what gamergate represents is truly misguided.

Anyone who thinks this isn't what Gamergate is about is deluded or a liar. This started with people harassing a woman over what should have been a private, domestic matter. The talk about "ethics" is tacked on precisely to lure more moderately-minded people like you (I assume) so that they can use you to legitimize their misogynist campaign. If you haven't realized that yet, I feel bad for you. You're in with this whether you like it or not.
 
I'm not going to derail this thread by getting into a protracted discussion about her videos. I was active in the threads about her videos if you want to go back and look what I wrote.
I wasn't asking for a long detailed explanation. I'm not that familiar with her work so I'm curious.
 
What "methods" of hers don't you approve of?

I'm genuinely curious.

People have different opinions regarding Sarkeesian and her message. I also believe that she has made some mistakes and misrepresented games, taken situations out of context so that they better serve the narrative.

But I just don't understand why people are wasting their time with this #GG nonsense.
 
The term #gamergate was coined by Adam Baldwin who has used the controversies to state some pretty shitty things. I haven't seen much from the "movement" to think they've moved very far from that poor birthing.



Also, Adam Baldwin is a twat.



It's ironic in that same way that rain on your wedding day is ironic? Because no one's freedom of speech is being violated.

Is that the actor Adam Baldwin?
 
Why do people associate gamergate with this bullshit? Should probably mention that #StopGamerGate2014 is trending right now. For whatever that means.

Bz_xr2_CIAIhDvm.png


Is that the actor Adam Baldwin?

Yeah. Twat.
 
Is it possible that this was a publicity stunt by her knowing this would happen? I ask because there are only 3 states in the entire country that allow people to carry firearms on a college campus. Utah, Colorado, and Idaho are the only ones. I don't know her so maybe she lives in Utah.

Is it possible she was trying to bring more attention to her cause by canceling her speaking engagement? There would have been officers in place during the speech as a standard practice anyway. Probably additional officers since there was a threat made.

I'm just throwing it out there because I don't know anything about her or her cause other than what's been posted in this thread.
 
People seriously need to clue in on the fact that Gamergate is rooted in misogyny. It began with sexist intents and no matter how much people want to change the meaning, they can't and won't. It's a tainted name full of a toxic group of people.

Why do people associate gamergate with this bullshit? Should probably mention that #StopGamerGate2014 is trending right now. For whatever that means.

Bz_xr2_CIAIhDvm.png




Yeah. Twat.

That comic is so accurate.
 
But the people of Utah have the right to carry concealed weapons. What I'm getting at is they would allow increased security and infringement of the state's resident's rights for one person, but not for another.

I was asking because there might be some federal laws involving the president that mandate exceptions or something that I don't know about.

Wisconsin has right to carry as of 2011, but they certainly weren't letting people with weapons of any type into the campaign rally.
 
Is it possible that this was a publicity stunt by her knowing this would happen? I ask because there are only 3 states in the entire country that allow people to carry firearms on a college campus. Utah, Colorado, and Idaho are the only ones. I don't know her so maybe she lives in Utah.

Is it possible she was trying to bring more attention to her cause by canceling her speaking engagement? There would have been officers in place during the speech as a standard practice anyway. Probably additional officers since there was a threat made.

I'm just throwing it out there because I don't know anything about her or her cause other than what's been posted in this thread.

Anything is possible. But it's not likely. Use your head and think about what's more likely. Don't fall for conspiracy theory bullshit, that's exactly what many members of #GamersGate are advocating.
 
Is it possible that this was a publicity stunt by her knowing this would happen? I ask because there are only 3 states in the entire country that allow people to carry firearms on a college campus. Utah, Colorado, and Idaho are the only ones. I don't know her so maybe she lives in Utah.

Is it possible she was trying to bring more attention to her cause by canceling her speaking engagement? There would have been officers in place during the speech as a standard practice anyway. Probably additional officers since there was a threat made.

I'm just throwing it out there because I don't know anything about her or her cause other than what's been posted in this thread.

You don't know anything about her or her cause but hey let's throw some shade in her direction and speculate as to her ulteriror motives with absolutely no cause to think that way?
 
Is it possible that this was a publicity stunt by her knowing this would happen? I ask because there are only 3 states in the entire country that allow people to carry firearms on a college campus. Utah, Colorado, and Idaho are the only ones. I don't know her so maybe she lives in Utah.

Is it possible she was trying to bring more attention to her cause by canceling her speaking engagement? There would have been officers in place during the speech as a standard practice anyway. Probably additional officers since there was a threat made.

I'm just throwing it out there because I don't know anything about her or her cause other than what's been posted in this thread.

"Is it possible she did it to herself for attention?" is the leading retort to any of this garbage by people within the gamergate movement. It's completely despicable and shows a gross inability to take what women say as genuine.
 
Is it possible that this was a publicity stunt by her knowing this would happen? I ask because there are only 3 states in the entire country that allow people to carry firearms on a college campus. Utah, Colorado, and Idaho are the only ones. I don't know her so maybe she lives in Utah.

"Knowing this would happen"? Are we on the victim blaming track again?

Is it possible she was trying to bring more attention to her cause by canceling her speaking engagement? There would have been officers in place during the speech as a standard practice anyway. Probably additional officers since there was a threat made.

Publicity is irrelevant to the issue at hand. The death threats are entirely unacceptable regardless of her intentions.
 
Is it possible that this was a publicity stunt by her knowing this would happen? I ask because there are only 3 states in the entire country that allow people to carry firearms on a college campus. Utah, Colorado, and Idaho are the only ones. I don't know her so maybe she lives in Utah.

Is it possible she was trying to bring more attention to her cause by canceling her speaking engagement? There would have been officers in place during the speech as a standard practice anyway. Probably additional officers since there was a threat made.

I'm just throwing it out there because I don't know anything about her or her cause other than what's been posted in this thread.

...

Except you threw out the same bullshit on game side before
 
Is it possible that this was a publicity stunt by her knowing this would happen? I ask because there are only 3 states in the entire country that allow people to carry firearms on a college campus. Utah, Colorado, and Idaho are the only ones. I don't know her so maybe she lives in Utah.

Is it possible she was trying to bring more attention to her cause by canceling her speaking engagement? There would have been officers in place during the speech as a standard practice anyway. Probably additional officers since there was a threat made.

I'm just throwing it out there because I don't know anything about her or her cause other than what's been posted in this thread.

"Look, I don't know anything about her, but isn't it possible that she's a lying and manipulative attention-whore?"
 
I apologize I wasn't trying to victim blame or anything. I was asking a serious question. I didn't mean to offend anyone. It just seemed odd since there are so very few colleges that allow firearms to begin with.
 
While I do agree with Sarkessian, I'm critical of her methods, such as using others video content, this is getting out of hand. It's like people want to destroy her and then ''gamers'' are blamed due to some fringe hate groups. It's such a terrible situation.
 
People have different opinions regarding Sarkeesian and her message. I also believe that she has made some mistakes and misrepresented games, taken situations out of context so that they better serve the narrative.

But I just don't understand why people are wasting their time with this #GG nonsense.

Sure, she may have chosen imperfect or misleading examples, but anyone who regularly plays games would find it pretty hard to ignore that her message is spot on. I mean I play a lot of games and they tend to be pretty sexist. Slowly getting better in some cases though.
 
I hope not. Her voice is important to gaming culture.

While silencing anyone's voice abhorrent and I find her viewpoint an important perspective that should be considered, but I don't find her personally to be a very good voice. She could be replaced with someone who could say the thing's she says or wants to say a lot better, at least in my view.
 
I apologize I wasn't trying to victim blame or anything. I was asking a serious question. I didn't mean to offend anyone. It just seemed odd since there are so very few colleges that allow firearms to begin with.

I wouldn't have been able to pick out the colleges that allow firearms from a pool of 4 before this topic so it seems unreasonable to extrapolate that she not only was fully aware of this but used it to her benefit in relation to the mountain of threats she's legitimately received since her debut.
 
I did what? I think you have me confused with somebody else. I've never heard of her before until this thread.

Then maybe you shouldn't speak on her motives if you don't know much about her and what's been going on recently?

I mean the fact you're even questioning someones credibility about getting death threats is a whole level of obnoxious.
 
Is it possible that this was a publicity stunt by her knowing this would happen? I ask because there are only 3 states in the entire country that allow people to carry firearms on a college campus. Utah, Colorado, and Idaho are the only ones. I don't know her so maybe she lives in Utah.

Is it possible she was trying to bring more attention to her cause by canceling her speaking engagement? There would have been officers in place during the speech as a standard practice anyway. Probably additional officers since there was a threat made.

I'm just throwing it out there because I don't know anything about her or her cause other than what's been posted in this thread.
And what was it in this thread that makes you think that? Of course it is possible, but as the University confirmed the threats, we either have to assume she is giving a speech here in hopes of...? Or that she made the threat to get her already very public name in the circle discussing this more public?

She has also received numerous death threats from other locations.

So until she is proven a liar, I will believe her.
 
Can't blame her, if she didn't feel safe then why hang around and make yourself a target.

She made the right call cancelling.

While I do agree with Sarkessian, I'm critical of her methods, such as using others video content, this is getting out of hand. It's like people want to destroy her and then ''gamers'' are blamed due to some fringe hate groups. It's such a terrible situation.

Agreed. If she want her work to be treated academically then she needs to either stop using other video content without permission or cite her sources.

Then again her video is mostly her own opinion, so I am not sure if her work can be viewed academically.
 
"Knowing this would happen"? Are we on the victim blaming track again?

It's a women involved in video games in some way. Of course we're on the victim blaming track.

"Oh she knew she'd get death threats, why did she do a video online?"
"Oh she knew people would post her information online forcing her to go to the cops and leave her home. Why does she keep doing this? It's all her fault?"

People should just sign their posts with #Gamergate so we know who the misogynistic assholes here are instead of hiding behind fake concern.
 
I did what? I think you have me confused with somebody else. I've never heard of her before until this thread.

You're right, I was thinking of someone else.

This

I'm not sure why everybody is jumping on the cops for this, they did what they were supposed to.

1. They get a burglary in progress call.
2. They find the dude inside the house just like the caller said.
3. They tell him why they're there.
4. He claims to live there.
5. Police look at the family pictures and see none of him, don't believe his story.
6. He gets increasingly mad(rightfully so, but still).
7. Cops try to remove him from the house.
8. He's non compliant and gets pepper sprayed.


I hate to break it to you guys, but the police didn't do anything wrong. They were trying to get him out of the house and he wouldn't go. Its pretty standard to get the person out first and figure the story out after because it's the safest way to handle the situation. What are they supposed to do just be like "ok Mr alleged burglar you say you live here. I know you can't prove you live here but have a nice day"?

I get that it's really easy as of late to jump on the anti-cop or racist cop bandwagon but damn. Don't be so quick to judge. Direct your outrage at the neighbors that called when he's lived there for a fucking YEAR.

was the post your avatar reminded me of

Similarities
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom