Scarlet Nexus has reached 2 million players worldwide

Was the game not available at launch on the service ?

Whose doing the console war digs now, come on lol.

Just you. When the game was available on the service is irrelevant. They are not the same services at all.

I'll ask again. Are Game Pass and PS+ comparable now?
 
Just you. When the game was available on the service is irrelevant. They are not the same services at all.

I'll ask again. Are Game Pass and PS+ comparable now?

I'm not gonna bother indulging your warring digs anymore lol.

My post was a reply to someone who was feigning concern at the supposed bad attach rate and how it should be counted as a failure. I replied with another recent multi-platform developers example who wasn't happy with the attach rate of their game on another service, unlike this developer who seems to be happy enough to specifically shout out.

Make of that what you will and let's stop bringing in irrelevant comparisons here.


Scarlet Nexus is a good game and deserves the attention. BANDAI NAMCO Studios has been knocking it out the park with Scarlet Nexus and Tales of Arise.


Arise will also probably find a lot of new audience on GP, traditionally JRPGs dont tend to sell a lot at retail on Xbox.
 
Last edited:
Make of that what you will and let's stop bringing in irrelevant comparisons here.

Says the guy making the irrelevant console warrior comparison.

jennifer lawrence ok GIF
 
4 Million players on PS plus for Oddworld is trash and bad, 1 Million (?maybe?) for Scarlet Nexus is a success. Right.


Depends on the games budget, expectations, the deal to bring it on the service and developer perception. Bandai seems to think so, going by the tweets.
 
Last edited:
I hope they will do well and have another go at it, but man, i felt the entire game is pretty shallow, too much padding and repetitive. The stages are mostly boring too.

It's basically one and done, and I never wish to look back, replay or complete any of the side quests at all.
 
I hope they will do well and have another go at it, but man, i felt the entire game is pretty shallow, too much padding and repetitive. The stages are mostly boring too.

It's basically one and done, and I never wish to look back, replay or complete any of the side quests at all.

Yes, this looks like the first step in what can arguably become a recurring franchise with more refinements.

Tales of Arise is a massive step up in quality but this game has potential to do better too.
 
Depends on the games budget, expectations, the deal to bring it on the service and developer perception. Bandai seems to think so, going by the tweets.
I'm not doubting Bandai Namco, I'm doubting the words of the guy that went on an Xbox podcast saying that the PS Plus deal harmed his game. Things don't add up.
 
I'm not doubting Bandai Namco, I'm doubting the words of the guy that went on an Xbox podcast saying that the PS Plus deal harmed his game. Things don't add up.

Yah definitely that guy must have been paid to say that. We just need to do some digging. Must have been bribed to say that uh
 
Tried the demo but like many anime style games, the characters felt way too floaty for my taste.

Maybe i'm gonna try again when it's 10 euros on pc, combat wasn't half bad.
 
Last edited:
Fun game. Definitely worth checking out if you haven't yet, especially seeing as it's on Game Pass. Could have done without the 2000 year old dragon trope though.
 
Haven't opened my copy yet. One day.

Tried the demo but like many anime style games, the characters felt way too floaty for my taste.

Maybe i'm gonna try again when it's 10 euros on pc, combat wasn't half bad.

Don't bother if you didn't like the demo.
 
Last edited:
Combat was good but everything else was pretty lackluster. Felt budget as hell.

Yeah, I said that in the other topic, the entirety of the game takes place in 5~ locations. Which is kind of impressive for a JRPG that they managed to cram a 20~30 hour game into such few locations.

Definitely felt like this game was made on a very tight budget.
 
Really wanted to like this game. Gave it 15 hours. It was just too boring. The characters were generic af and the story was not interesting at all. If you're deciding between this or Tales of Arise, go with Tales.
 
Whoops, here's another game I bought day 1 and never installed. Maybe after I finish Elden Ring before Sunbreak.
 
Played the demo and didn't like it at all. It looked interesting in the trailers but playing it was another story.
 
Random fact, the guy talking in that gif voiced the character Vamp from Metal Gear Solid 2 Sons of Liberty, among many other video game characters. He is also a former cast member of MadTV.

also, the guy who gets his head blown off in the car in Pulp Fiction.

MV5BY2FlZThiNDQtNzZkYS00Y2NiLWJlZmEtOThmYmZiZWZkZmQ1XkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyNjUxMjc1OTM@._V1_.jpg
 
You're saying PS+ games are trash? Ok.

Talking about games that go on PS+ day one. Perhaps not "trash" but they certainly were not in line for top sales numbers. This is why games on PS+ at launch are rare.
 
Last edited:
It's a big weeb anime game on the FIFA Chads console of choice.
If they put it on PS+ it would do a lot better.

So, you're saying that if the games gets on a platform, where there's more players and even more having plus then game pass, then it would perform better?

The game would have done better if it was included with games with gold and not game pass.

Gold and plus are comparable, game pass isn't.
 
Last edited:
So, you're saying that if the games gets on a platform, where there's more players and even more having plus then game pass, then it would perform better?

The game would have done better if it was included with games with gold and not game pass.

Gold and plus are comparable, game pass isn't.
Or you just took what I said out of the context of the message I was replying to?
I'm trying to say that, generally, xbox owners may not include the target audience for the type of game Scarlet Nexus is and thus, had it been on PS+ instead it may have had an even higher download/player number.
 
Top Bottom