clarky
Gold Member
Just like a Titanfall BR was a bad idea?Come on now... he's not wrong,a fucking Titanfall extraction shooter was considered an idea good enough to greenlight...just think how retarded that is.Next, they'll greenlight a FIFA RPG with loot mechanics everytime you score a goal...
There's a point where an idea is so out of place that someone in the board room just has to say "maybe that's not it champ" before they greenlight the damn thing. I guess that person came in later at the office for Titanfall extraction.
And after Clair Obscur exposed this greedy braindead AAA industry for what it is, it's hard for me to side with the "it's just an experiment,they need the revenue,bla blabla" crowd when it's been failure after failure and layoff after layoff and it's clear we're in the "they don't know wtf they are doing and throwing shit at the wall to see what sticks" phase of AAA money laundering....ehhh,I mean "development".
Why is a extraction shooter sequel a bad idea? Arc Raiders looks ok and Hunger looks great. Its just not a (sub)genre that is held in high regard around these parts for some reason.
A few companies see the potential and have took (largely unsuccessful) shots at taking it mainstream. Wheres the wrong in that? Better than yet another generic souls clone.
Last edited: