• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Scorpio GPU Equivalent to a GTX 1070?

I haven't seen any direct comparisons, but this article says this:

In simple terms, the graphics core will be more than capable of going toe-to-toe with today's top-end graphics card; the brand-new Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 has 6.5TFLOPs of performance. By the time Scorpio launches, it will be the equivalent of a mid-range PC in 2017, which is how most consoles tend to launch.

More precisely, this puts it somewhere between the GTX 1060 and 1070. So more like a 1065.

Still, this probably doesn't say much given how little we know about the system.
 
I'm sure it will be powerful enough, I'm more curious to see how much devs utilize it when they know it will only serve a small subset of the audience. The PS3 was rarely utilized to its full potential, outside of first party games.

I dunno, I need to be sold on it. My Xbone literally collects dust as is, it only turns on to watch a 4K bluray.
 
Ultimately depends on their final price point.

$400 for 1060
$600 for 1070

It'll probably be the mobile cards for those ones.
 
I'm excited to see what this thing can do, and I really hope Microsoft is going to treat it a bit more like a new console launch than Sony did with the PS4 Pro.

I think Sony was absolutely correct with how they are positioning the Pro, since they have a huge lead and it wouldn't make sense to hobble that, but I think Microsoft can afford to be more aggressive when it comes to doing a bit of a harder reset.
 
The article is comparing Nvidia TFLOPS to AMD TFOPS, so you can safely ignore the entire article as its based on false assumptions.

At the very least you'll want to compare AMD TFLOPS to AMD TFLOPS and the closet thing we have to the expected Scorpio GPU is the RX 480, which is a solid tier below the GTX 1070 in performance. Even that comparison isn't very good as the RX 480 is Polaris based and the Scorpio will likely have a Vega based GPU, so they aren't even on the same architecture.
 
Just in the general sense, the power makes sense (overkill, frankly), but the price doesn't. My desktop has a 1070, and even at PC High/Ultra settings, a lot of games breeeze at 4K. It sounds like the article is just comparing raw spec figures, without any insight into actual architecture.
 
The article is comparing Nvidia TFLOPS to AMD TFOPS, so you can safely ignore the entire article as its based on false assumptions.

At the very least you'll want to compare AMD TFLOPS to AMD TFLOPS and the closet thing we have to the expected Scorpio GPU is the RX 480, which is a solid tier below the GTX 1070 in performance. Even that comparison isn't very good as the RX 480 is Polaris based and the Scorpio will likely have a Vega based GPU, so they aren't even on the same architecture.
Makes sense, thanks for the clarification.

I suppose the architecture is also a factor. Scorpio is unlikely to use Polaris at this point.
 
I'm sure it will be powerful enough, I'm more curious to see how much devs utilize it when they know it will only serve a small subset of the audience. The PS3 was rarely utilized to its full potential, outside of first party games.

I dunno, I need to be sold on it. My Xbone literally collects dust as is, it only turns on to watch a 4K bluray.

I thought ps3 wasn't utilized because of the weird architecture
 
They have mentioned Nvidia cards in a few interviews and i think thats weird when AMD is their partner. I wouldnt bring up the big mac when we are going to have whoppers for dinner.
 
I was under the impression the Pro was more like a downclocked 470.

The full RX 480 is around 5.8 Tflop iirc, so that would be a reasonable estimate for Scorpio.

Yeah the RX 470 is 4.9 Tflops, so the Pro is similar to a downclocked 470 (power wise) and with the RX 480 being 5.8 Tflop (close enough to Scorpio's 6 Tflops) that should be pretty much what Scorpio will offer.

It will just be down to what CPU they stick in it then.
 
Ultimately depends on their final price point.

$400 for 1060
$600 for 1070

It'll probably be the mobile cards for those ones.

With the GTX 10 series, the mobile versions are very, very close in performance to the desktop ones - to the point where they dropped the "mobile" label entirely. I don't know how AMD chipsets fare, but if it's on par with a mobile GTX 10 in performance, then it's going to be pretty powerful.
 
The power of a 400 dollar plus video card. I don't think so. I guess if you use code "to the metal" variables in your math, then I guess sure.
 
Isnt the ps4 pro already 480? That wouldnt make sense to wait and be the same power.

It's a custom GPU based off the RX 480 with lower clocks, 911MHz (4.2TF) for the PS4 Pro's GPU vs the RX 480's 1266MHz (5.83TF).

The Scorpio's GPU may be a custom GPU based off of Vega and could feature a higher number of cores at a lower clock-speed, such as 3328 cores and a clock-speed of 910MHz for 6.05TF as an examaple.

Their comparison doesn't really make any sense as we don't really know how Vega is going to perform and AMD's GFLOPs so far have not been comparable with NVIDIA's GFLOPs.
 
Garbage article, but it's fair to say the GPU will fall somewhere between a 480 and 1070 depending on architecture. I'm inclined to say more towards the former than latter.
 
Top Bottom