Lol the shit you come up with amazes me sometimes.
Mostly. Except this part
This is such bone headed, old school "protect the business" bullshit. It's not the 80s anymore. Everyone knows what wrestling is, even the kids. WWE has gone to great lengths to get people attached to the people who play the characters on their show instead of the characters. They're trying something new, a new way of marketing their talent to their audience, yet Melzer and his little buddy are stuck on "why are they breaking kayfabe to promote charity work" shit.
It's pretty silly. You would think two guys who have made their lives (especially Meltzer) don't see the upside or even the bigger picture of what WWE is doing with their brand and talent. Alvarez in particular is a real shittheel about this stuff. When he goes on his high pitched rants about how IT MAKES NO SENSE, essentially giving voice to posters in this thread who think Stephanie is a terrible human and ruins the show because charity work promos break kayfabe.
WWE moving away from forcing their talent to stay in character even during promotional appearances is the best thing they can do. Remember when they made Kane show up to the premier of his movie in his wrestling gear? It's like making actors show up in character to all their press junkets for their movies. How silly would that be? That's how WWE was operating for 30 years. It's a much needed change. WWE's writing issues have nothing at all to do with the way they present their talent as humans outside of the ring.
HHH and Steph flipping from face to heel in the same segment is absurd. They have no consistency, and thus none of their heel stuff gets any investment because they pretty much do it all while winking and saying "we're only pretending to be bad guys".
They claim RAW is an "action adventure soap opera". Yet they appear to have no consistent rule for whether RAW is in any sort of kayfabe or not. Is RAW a story, or is it half a story that constantly breaks to go "WWE is great and all the heels are actually nice people"?
What's the point in doing any heel stuff if it's immediately followed by the same heel breaking character and telling you they're just pretending? Should the villains of all TV shows stop mid-episode and lecture you about their charity work as actors?
It's all well and good to promote your brand with philanthropy as marketing, but if your face of that is going be Stephanie, then maybe Stephanie shouldn't be playing a heel authority figure on the TV show.
No, but no one would be upset if Tom Hiddleson was in a commercial for a charity during a TV broadcast of The Avengers. Which is basically what the charity promos are. They're bumper segments. It just happens that most wrestlers go by their wrestling name when not wrestling for some reason. They aren't in character when doing those promos.
On top of that, is it really impossible to believe that Triple H and Stephanie give a shit about kids? As in, the characters. Do people really think a heel character is a heel in all aspects of life? Even in the 80s, it would be acknowledged that heels had wives and kids. Are we to believe that they went home and were the same person with their families as they were in the ring with their opponents? Of course not. Mean boss does not equal hates kids, too.
The
opening promo of RAW was about their charity for kids with cancer. How can I boo two people advocating donations for cancer research? Am I even supposed to boo them? They act like heels later in the show, but they're total babyfaces in the first segment.