• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Silk Road founder sentenced to life in prison

Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't believe in prison terms for drug use, but I sure as hell believe in prison for drug distribution, especially depending on a person's position within the chain of distribution. Someone who is an addict themselves and helps sell in order to deal with their own addiction? I'm more sympathetic and more interested in rehabilitation than prison. But someone like this who organizes the distribution of actual harmful substances (the guy's not just selling weed) for profit? Shut him away for quite a while

Why is selling drugs to people willing to buy them bad though? Besides the law saying it's bad I'm not understanding what the problem is. Deaths cause by alcohol , cigarettes, and heart disease are big killers in this country, I don't see anyone really on any moral crusades to take down the local McDonalds or Wendy's, or what about the corner liquor store that sells hard liquor and cigarettes ? No, so why is there this high and mighty moral attitude when it comes to drugs? I don't get it personally , to me someone willing to buy drugs is no different than the willing consumer stopping by the McDonalds a drive thru or liquor store, so I just can't agree in locking non violent drug distributors up for selling drugs to people willing to buy them.
 

PantherLotus

Professional Schmuck
Basically this comes down to whether you think Walter White, if less romantic and more internetty and perhaps a bit less personally violent, deserved life in prison.
 

Zeus Molecules

illegal immigrants are stealing our air
I cant wait for the movie about this guys life to come out. I imagine it to be 1 part social network and 1 part blow.
 

-MD-

Member
http://www.wired.com/2015/05/silk-road-creator-ross-ulbricht-sentenced-life-prison/

The defense’s arguments about Ulbricht’s character and his idealistic motives were also undercut by accusations that Ulbricht had paid for the murder of six people, including a potential informant and a blackmailer. Those accusations never became formal charges in Ulbricht’s case—five out of six of the murder-for-hires appear to have been part of a lucrative scam targeting Ulbricht, with no actual victims. But they deeply colored Ulbricht’s trial, and no doubt loomed large in the mind of Judge Forrest at sentencing.

This says the hits were a scam against him, am I missing something?
 
He doesn't deserve the sentence at all, if the government's of the world had a sensible drug policy then he wouldn't have needed to set up his site, the sentence should be passed to Obama, Cameron Merkel and the the like
 

Purexed

Banned
Good, Silk Road was a cesspool, and hopefully this action discourages the next aspiring Ulbricht to think twice.
 
I thought the trial had more to do with him trying to put a hit on someone?

Edit: Yeppers.

Bingo. Unfortunate but that's what happens. An amalgamation of charges, you knew something would stick. Not that other charges shouldn't, but that was definitely the kicker and most likely why the prosecution/government was weary of a plea deal involving cooperation that he no doubt would've taken. Still a landmark case as far as independent internet markets go. Wonder if this will have any ripple effect on bitcoin.

edit: price is actually up today lol
 

The Technomancer

card-carrying scientician
Why is selling drugs to people willing to buy them bad though? Besides the law saying it's bad I'm not understanding what the problem is. Deaths cause by alcohol , cigarettes, and heart disease are big killers in this country, I don't see anyone really on any moral crusades to take down the local McDonalds or Wendy's, or what about the corner liquor store that sells hard liquor and cigarettes ? No, so why is there this high and mighty moral attitude when it comes to drugs? I don't get it personally , to me someone willing to buy drugs is no different than the willing consumer stopping by the McDonalds a drive thru or liquor store, so I just can't agree in locking non violent drug distributors up for selling drugs to people willing to buy them.

Well I do actually think we should re-examine how we handle alcohol and especially cigarettes. And the difference is that opiates, like nicotine, create an actual chemical dependency. Yes, a person can theoretically get addicted to anything, but there are some substances that generate addictions at much higher rates, and even if a person willingly buys into starting to use such a substance that doesn't mean that they have the same chance to willingly stop using it. An addict is not really "willingly buying drugs" in the sense that I go to the store to buy cereal, not when the choice is "buy drugs or experience genuine physical and psychological pain and suffering". Yes ultimately there are ways to stop, but the dependency is itself a coercive influence on behavior.

If heroin users could just quit cold turkey easily I would have basically no problem with its sale, for the same reason that I'm more or less fine with marijuana.
 

antonz

Member
Silk road was much larger than just drugs. Weapon shipments,child pornography etc. All of which deserved the book thrown at him. The Attempt to hire hitmen to murder multiple people is just the icing on that cake of fucked up shit
 

FlyinJ

Douchebag. Yes, me.
http://www.wired.com/2015/05/silk-road-creator-ross-ulbricht-sentenced-life-prison/



This says the hits were a scam against him, am I missing something?

You need to read the whole wired article I posted earlier.

Basically, people were pretending to steal from him, then pretending to be hitmen that would kill the thieves (themselves). And he paid them to kill the fake thieves, and they sent him staged photos of the fake thieves dead to prove that the hit happened.

The guy was an absolute sociopath.
 

Aurongel

Member
He deserved it 100%, ordering the hits, enabling massive gun trafficking and CP rings is a far more grim rap sheet than most people who get that sentence have.
 
You need to read the whole wired article I posted earlier.

Basically, people were pretending to steal from him, then pretending to be hitmen that would kill the thieves. And he paid them to kill the fake thieves, and they sent him staged photos of the fake thieves dead to prove that the hit happened.

The guy was an absolute sociopath.

Sounds like entrapment to me
 

FlyinJ

Douchebag. Yes, me.
Sounds like entrapment to me

Well... just read the article, it's amazing.

One of the hits could be considered entrapment because the entire thing was orchestrated by the DEA/FBI, but the other 5 were just random people scamming him the entire time
 

ICKE

Banned
I find it hard to comprehend how some people still try to make excuses for these sociopaths. This was a criminal enterprise and it did not only revolve around drugs.
 

leadbelly

Banned
This sums it up best:

I don't think it does actually. Silk Road if anything is actually a mirror of society. If you think of the actual cost in life from drug trafficking in the real world, Silk Road pales in comparison. The amount of people being slaughtered in Mexico for instance.

You can see how legalising the drug trade would solve a lot of these problems. I have certain reservations about heroin because of just how easily it can destroy lives, but the truth is, you are not going to stop the drug trade or people taking drugs. The best thing you can do is spend the money on helping people get off drugs rather than incarcerating them.
 

The Technomancer

card-carrying scientician
I don't think it does actually. Silk Road if anything is actually a mirror of society. If you think of the actual cost in life from drug trafficking in the real world, Silk Road pales in comparison. The amount of people being slaughtered in Mexico for instance.

You can see how legalising the drug trade would solve a lot of these problems. I have certain reservations about heroin because of just how easily it can destroy lives, but the truth is, you are not going to stop the drug trade or people taking drugs. The best thing you can do is spend the money on helping people get off drugs rather than incarcerating them.

Hence why I'm for the rehabilitation and aid for users and addicts and take a harsh stance towards those who distribute and sell for their own profit
 

FlyinJ

Douchebag. Yes, me.
I don't think it does actually. Silk Road if anything is actually a mirror of society. If you think of the actual cost in life from drug trafficking in the real world, Silk Road pales in comparison. The amount of people being slaughtered in Mexico for instance.

You can see how legalising the drug trade would solve a lot of these problems. I have certain reservations about heroin because of just how easily it can destroy lives, but the truth is, you are not going to stop the drug trade or people taking drugs. The best thing you can do is spend the money on helping people get off drugs rather than incarcerating them.

Huh? That quote was pointing out that these internet libertarians think they have the answers, but of course they have absolutely no idea how the real world works. And Silk Road is an excellent parable to this.

I am 100% for the legalization and regulation of all drugs. Silk Road is the exact opposite of that.
 
Well... just read the article, it's amazing.

One of the hits could be considered entrapment because the entire thing was orchestrated by the DEA/FBI, but the other 5 were just random people scamming him the entire time

Could still be argued as entrapment by others, the whole thing though is entrapment by a system that is fundamentally fucked
 

Aegus

Member
Huh, so they arrested one of his guys for having cocaine which was sent by the FBI in the first place?

What? Is that even legal?
 

leadbelly

Banned
Hence why I'm for the rehabilitation and aid for users and addicts and take a harsh stance towards those who distribute and sell for their own profit

The thing is though, how long has the US been fighting the war on drugs? They are never going to stop the flow of drugs. It is not simply the harm it does to addicts either, the war on drugs is causing real problems for the countries these drugs are coming from and passing through. Drug trafficking itself perpetuates violence.

Another thing you can do by legalising it, is you are able to regulate it. You can avoid drugs being cut with all sorts of shit.
 

Dr.Acula

Banned
Robert Pattinson could play him:

RhFuKKR.png
HSj6aEW.jpg
 

leadbelly

Banned
Huh? That quote was pointing out that these internet libertarians think they have the answers, but of course they have absolutely no idea how the real world works. And Silk Road is an excellent parable to this.

I am 100% for the legalization and regulation of all drugs. Silk Road is the exact opposite of that.

Libertarians are also for the legalisation of drugs though. That is why I questioned it.
 

Damaniel

Banned
I'd say 'too harsh', but he did try to put hits out on people. It's probably still too much, but I'm not going to shed a tear for the guy.
 

Fjordson

Member
All this stuff is so fascinating in a scary way.

Not surprised seeing as it's in the US, he really lost control of himself. For anyone interested in this site's history or the story of the guy behind it and how difficult it was to catch him, Wired has an amazing write up on him here:

http://www.wired.com/2015/04/silk-road-1/?mbid=social_twitter

It's quite long, but worth the read. It's a Hollywood story through and through.
Definitely a great read.
 

OG Kush

Member
His ideas of economic liberty should celebrated though.
Just wondering, do any members here know people in the DEA or members of the DEA or police force or anything? Just wondering what they think of taking people down on drug possession... do they really feel a sense of achievement for arresting someone because he/she was taking drugs?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom