HomerSimpson-Man
Member
Tensions mounting, vague deadlines nearing, exciting yes? Spring feels like an eternity away at this pace.
krypt0nian said:EA said that Madden would look like the target render too. Oh well.
krypt0nian said:EA said that Madden would look like the target render too. Oh well.
Target renders are shit.
SolidSnakex said:Except HS wasn't a target render. That was an engine that they'd been building for awhile before then.
Ponn01 said:Now you gone and did it...
cue silent hill guy.....
mashoutposse said:In the same Beyond3D thread, DeanoC, the lead programmer of Heavenly Sword had this to say about his game:
Q: Since you guys are here, will the outdoor scenes in HS actually look that good in the final game? After seeing the big drop N3 seems to have taken in it's newest screens, it just seems the quality in those outdoor scenes is very very ambitious. Can you comment at all?
A: I'll stick with my previous comments, that there is nothing that we showed in the E3 demo thats not achievable at full framerate on the machine were working on.
This is what his game looks like:
Seems pretty next-gen to me...
is this in-game, cgi, cutscene..........what is it??mashoutposse said:In the same Beyond3D thread, DeanoC, the lead programmer of Heavenly Sword had this to say about his game:
Q: Since you guys are here, will the outdoor scenes in HS actually look that good in the final game? After seeing the big drop N3 seems to have taken in it's newest screens, it just seems the quality in those outdoor scenes is very very ambitious. Can you comment at all?
A: I'll stick with my previous comments, that there is nothing that we showed in the E3 demo thats not achievable at full framerate on the machine were working on.
This is what his game looks like:
Seems pretty next-gen to me...
krypt0nian said:EA said that Madden would look like the target render too. Oh well.
Target renders are shit.
krypt0nian said:EA said that Madden would look like the target render too. Oh well.
Target renders are shit.
Lil' Dice said:Do you understand the complexity of making a game run stable with multiple assets, AI implementation, full lighting, particle effects, shaders, rendering, etc, etc, on an incomplete and unstable dev-kit? The shit you pointed out is elementary stuff kid, when you get to high school then we'll talk ok?
puebla said:is this in-game, cgi, cutscene..........what is it??
DonasaurusRex said:countdown till the models are called "plasticky"
in
5
4
3....
krypt0nian said:One poster = xbots now? :lol
mashoutposse said:LOL, SSx
That's not a target render -- he has already stated that those are actual PS3-rendered scenes outputted at 1080p and stitched together to simulate an acceptable framerate.
krypt0nian said:The point is it sure as hell wasn't a game. If it were, he wouldn't have to say the machine would be capable. I'm not saying its not possible. I sure as hell want it to be. But nothing exists for me yet, except for MGS4 and the other realtime confirmed things.
krypt0nian said:EA said that Madden would look like the target render too. Oh well.[/B]
HomerSimpson-Man said:Tensions mounting, vague deadlines nearing, exciting yes? Spring feels like an eternity away at this pace.
HomerSimpson-Man said:Tensions mounting, vague deadlines nearing, exciting yes? Spring feels like an eternity away at this pace.
SolidSnakex said:The HS demo is one of the demos confirmed to be real time.
krypt0nian said:Real time at what framerate? C'mon you know what I'm saying.
monkeymagic said:Nothing to do with the X360 because it has such fabulouse tools and is so efficient.
Nor could it have anything to do with EA because they're such fabulous developers.
I mean look at the FN3 demo - that shit is unreal with all TWO fighters looking amazingly real!
Gek54 said:Excuse me, xbot.
Seriously what is the arguement? .. that MGS4, looking as good as it did over 6 months ago running at 60fps on a very early and UNDERPOWERED dev kit, shouldnt be considered impressive becuase it MIGHT not have been running a few AI routines? WOW.
Being disgruntled isn't any kind of rationalization for disrepecting a company's requests for discretion, esp. if those requests are explicitly laid out in the form of a binding contract that one consents to sign. You disrespect those requests, you brand yourself untrustworthy, simple as that. You may have a worthy reason that absolves you of the transgression but if disgruntlement is the best reason you can come up with, you fall far short. Everybody's threshold for becoming disgruntled is different - it could be as little as being asked to cut your lunch break short by 10 minutes on one particular day - but the kind of things that would warrant dissent in public forums outside of the company aren't covered by "disgruntled".Lil' Dice said:Not at all. There are hundreds, if not thousands of people employed by my company who dislike the product we put out, many of them post in online forums to vent their frustrations; doesn't make them un-believable or untrustworthy, just disgruntled. I choose not to post anything detrimental to my job because I respect our guidelines, he didn't and it was his choice.
krypt0nian said:Real time at what framerate? C'mon you know what I'm saying.
kaching said:Being disgruntled isn't any kind of rationalization for disrepecting a company's requests for discretion, esp. if those requests are explicitly laid out in the form of a binding contract that one consents to sign. You disrespect those requests, you brand yourself untrustworthy, simple as that. You may have a worthy reason that absolves you of the transgression but if disgruntlement is the best reason you can come up with, you fall far short. Everybody's threshold for becoming disgruntled is different - it could be as little as being asked to cut your lunch break short by 10 minutes on one particular day - but the kind of things that would warrant dissent in public forums outside of the company aren't covered by "disgruntled".
krypt0nian said:Real time at what framerate? C'mon you know what I'm saying.
monkeymagic said:Nothing to do with the X360 because it has such fabulouse tools and is so efficient.
Nor could it have anything to do with EA because they're such fabulous developers.
I mean look at the FN3 demo - that shit is unreal with all TWO fighters looking amazingly real!
Vibri said:I have a masters degree and have worked in the video game industry for 11 years, so let's dispense with the playground jibes and stick to the point shall we?
You said 'nothing on PS3 is realtime', when there's an overwhelming amount of hard evidence that there is. See post above.
Now, if you want to retract or change your statement along the lines of "I haven't seen any finished game code running on final hardware" then yes, that would be a different discussion. Though frankly, there seem to be some pretty advanced shaders, particle effects, environmental AI, and 'rendering' (as you generically put it) already running on in the MGS4 demo, yes, in realtime.
sportzhead said:If the PS3 can push out graphics like that in realtime, show me. Stop with all the target renders, CG, and non game play tech demos. Show me a game in motion being played by someone with those graphics and you will have my money.
Sony acting like a kid in high school that says he has a crazy good looking girlfriend that goes to another school, but carries a picture around of her in his backpack to prove it.
Shogmaster said:Seriously. Those antics worked fine back in May 2005, but In middle of january with only 2~4 months until launch, we need footage of people playing real games (especially if what that Sony rep told me about some 1st party games being ready for review process as early as Febuary).
i know you are taking the piss - but... yes!!!!"Wait dude, he doesn't actually say the game will look like that. He says the system is capable of it. SPPPPPPPPPPIN!"
"Being disgruntled isn't any kind of rationalization for disrepecting a company's requests for discretion, esp. if those requests are explicitly laid out in the form of a binding contract that one consents to sign. You disrespect those requests, you brand yourself untrustworthy, simple as that."
Onix said:This isn't like Killzone CG*
Shogmaster said:(especially if what that Sony rep told me about some 1st party games being ready for review process as early as Febuary).
mashoutposse said:Q: hey Dean, what framerate is the outdoor scenes currently running at?
A: Outdoor scenes of the complexity of the trailer are currently slow about 5fps I think. Thats over 2000 real guys (there are visibly more but far away there not proper guys) with the general shadow system (its a CPU killer for so many entities, its at the top of my list to be moved off the main core),
We aren't even close to getting this stuff working optimally yet...
This response is from July 2005. The other tidbit I posted above was from a day or two ago. It now sounds like he's completely confident that he's going to hit a playable framerate.
kaching said:Being disgruntled isn't any kind of rationalization for disrepecting a company's requests for discretion, esp. if those requests are explicitly laid out in the form of a binding contract that one consents to sign. You disrespect those requests, you brand yourself untrustworthy, simple as that. You may have a worthy reason that absolves you of the transgression but if disgruntlement is the best reason you can come up with, you fall far short. Everybody's threshold for becoming disgruntled is different - it could be as little as being asked to cut your lunch break short by 10 minutes on one particular day - but the kind of things that would warrant dissent in public forums outside of the company aren't covered by "disgruntled".
Shogmaster said:Speaking of which, guess which trailer was conspicuously absent from the PS3 trailer-a-rama at CES! :lol
Lil' Dice said:Considering the fact that "disgruntled" employees have gone on killing sprees in the workplace, I don't think criticizing the PS3 is too extreme to be considered disgruntlement.
DCharlie said:i know you are taking the piss - but... yes!!!!
Why can't anyone just say "YES, the game WILL look like this?" I'm pretty sure it's nothing to do with NDAs, so i'm guessing the answer is because most likely they are hedging thier bets incase they can't! I'd assume Deano and crew are working hard to get what was running at 5fps realtime upto (hopefully) 60fps with full AI , collissions, physics etc.
I have a lot of respect for Deano - the devloper diary really makes you root for NT - but really at this stage, no one is committing to saying they can do what they presented without having an escape clause in what they say. But really, this is a yes/no answer :
"Since you guys are here, will the outdoor scenes in HS actually look that good in the final game? " - instead, we get the cryptic response.
Not that i blame them, but it's a running theme to a lot of quotes surrounding the PS3.
i think what is muddying the waters here is there is being untrustworthy in "you can't keep an NDA" and untrustworth as in "what he says is false". Seems that some people earlier are suggesting that not being able to do the first implies that the second is also applicable, which i'd disagree with.
sportzhead said:If the PS3 can push out graphics like that in realtime, show me. Stop with all the target renders, CG, and non game play tech demos. Show me a game in motion being played by someone with those graphics and you will have my money.
Sony acting like a kid in high school that says he has a crazy good looking girlfriend that goes to another school, but carries a picture around of her in his backpack to prove it.
Vibri said:~Snip~
"Note that he posted that comment in a thread where someone got fired for talking too much. I'm surprised he said anything at all."
golem said:the posters on Beyond3d drop their pants everytime any dev there comes close to nudging at sony's nda.
but when a negative opinion came out all of the sudden they were worried about the legality of it all...
Vague? Most of that was pretty blatantly out in the open. Other than not mentioning exactly which demo he worked on by name, he didn't tiptoe around much else. And if he isn't disgruntled, he's just being an attention whore - neither path is going to do much for his credibility.Unison said:I think it's more likely that he thought he was tiptoeing around the NDA with his vague comments. He probably wasn't really disgruntled at all...
What people are saying is that the second is more likely if the first is present, taking into account the motive for breaking NDA in the first place as well. It's either disgruntlement or attention-mongering, neither of which is good reason to break an NDA and either trait is grounds to question the general truthfulness of what they have to say on its own.DCharlie said:i think what is muddying the waters here is there is being untrustworthy in "you can't keep an NDA" and untrustworth as in "what he says is false". Seems that some people earlier are suggesting that not being able to do the first implies that the second is also applicable, which i'd disagree with.
Did I say it wasn't disgruntlement? Pay attention - I said disgruntlement wasn't suitable justification for the actions taken...just like being disgruntled isn't suitable justification for going on a killing spree.Lil'Dice said:Considering the fact that "disgruntled" employees have gone on killing sprees in the workplace, I don't think criticizing the PS3 is too extreme to be considered disgruntlement.
MightyHedgehog said:QFMFT