I watched all three Toy Story films the other day. They're all great, but Toy Story 2 takes the win for me. I laughed the most (hysterically at times) and it was generally just such a fantastic trip down memory lane. Toy Story 2 is actually a genius film with impeccable comedy delivery.
Pixar generally make brilliant films all-round though.
surprised at all the Wall-E love.
Ratatouille, inside out, finding nemo, and the toy story's would be my favorites.
Toy Story has aged really poorly visually. I saw it for the first time when it released on blu-ray, so I had no special nostalgia for the film going in but it looked kind of bad.
Not the film's fault obviously as it's a product of it's time but Pixar's gorgeous art direction is one reason I place their films above other 3D animation studios so it does hamper my enjoyment of the movie a bit.
My Man.
Toy Story 2 is incredible, and delivers in all possible fronts.
My Man.
Toy Story 2 is incredible, and delivers in all possible fronts.
Thats great, but the second half of the movie just kind of sucks, which is why you see so many posts in this very thread that say "the first half of wall-e."Thematically speaking, movies with less dialogue are often (not always, but often) considered more skillful works of art because a vast majority of films use character speaking to tell the plot or a characters motivation. This is because it is much easier for a character to say out loud "I feel terrible." instead of showing it through action.
You risk the audience not getting it, you spend a lot of screen time on establishing emotions and setup juxtaposition by behavior. If you can make a character tell his motivation and how he feels you don't have to try and be clever and make all sorts of things that shows it in a way that the entire audience gets it.
Wall-E has little speak, and it's character are extremely well animated in the sense that they convey a lot of complex and nuanced emotional states. There is a lot of growth in the characters, and it's even carried over into meaningful sound design with even the noises jibble they make, they tone, and delivery all mean something.
this is ironic given that years ago i called this out saying they clearly had a message to send and was quoted multiple times saying but but the filmmakers have explicitly stated multiple times there were no hidden messages or political/environmental message to the movie!On top of all this, the film also has a lot to say about the environment, about obesity, about social interactions. It's chokefull of clever social and political comments, but it's in the background. Kids can enjoy the cute characters, but adults can appreciate what is going on behind the scene, because it's quite profound.
The film also escapes some of the worst sins of the Buddy-comedy syndrome that a lot of animated films tend to fall into. It still has it, but it is less so, and because of it the film is less predictable than something like Cars which is the epitome of the buddy-comedy trope in their films. But you can see it in the majority of Up, in Toy Story 2 and 3 and so on.
Wall-E really, truly is a great film. It's not just a really enjoyable and entertaining film, it really truly has something extra.
Wreck it ralph
I can't believe it's a movie that was made in the mid 90s, honestly. The art direction and animation more than make up for some blotchy textures; if they were sharper, it would hold up very nicely, visually. I agree it does look dated, but it in NO WAY impacts the feel of the film, unless you're really nit picking.
It's got great moments but feels overstuffed with characters and lacks the magic, emotional development/punch and simplicity of the first. Jessie is an incredibly annoying character in 2 but is much more likable in 3.
I don't agree, tbh. The first one is a lot more gloomy and depressing, also a lot more annoying than whatever was in 2 (woody, for example, was insufferable in his character arc)
And well, parts like the star wars parody (and the resolution of the new buzz character) are absolutely brilliant, and that's just one moment there.
Wreck it ralph
Don't really have a favorite, but if I was forced to probably "A Bug's Life", "Toy Story", and "Finding Nemo". In that order. There hasn't been a pixar movie released in a while though has it ?
1) Ratatouille
![]()
2) The Incredibles
![]()
3) Toy Story
![]()
4) Monsters Inc.
![]()
5) Toy Story 3
![]()
6) Toy Story 2
![]()
7) Finding Nemo
![]()
8) A Bug's Life
![]()
It's got great moments but feels overstuffed with characters and lacks the magic, emotional development/punch and simplicity of the first. Jessie is an incredibly annoying character in 2 but is much more likable in 3.
Finding Nemo became my favorite Pixar movie when it released and it remains so to this day.
Their other output from 2001-2007 is basically all tied for 2nd place. That was a seriously good run.
Wow, strongly agree to disagree there. Sid's arc is amazing and a great idea for a villain. I've watched it two times in the last week and I've gotta say there's nothing I don't like about the movie in general. Closest I've seen to perfection. The dialogue is fantastic and its pacing feels great from beginning to end. Toy Story 2 feels too crowded and the inclusion of Jessie was a mistake. They needed a strong female character but she's just damn annoying throughout and lacks the depth of Buzz and Woody.Buzz and crew may have carried the second film hard. but the Sid abduction arc in the first film wasn't great IMO. The first half (and the final 15 minutes) is god-tier Pixar, though, but Toy Story 2 is more consistent and sticks to its guns throughout, and it's a better film overall for it. Toy Story 1 has too many story arcs.
I feel like I'm bashing Toy Story 1 here, but I honestly still find it a brilliant film...just not as good as the second instalment.