This just further drives home the point that not only can Microsoft not afford to lose the US and UK as their main markets, they also need more. If the current pre-order numbers are anything to go by, Microsoft is in for a rude awakening.
Also well deserved.
On software R&D costs, PS4 is more advanced than PS3, but costs will depend on 'how dev community works to create good titles for us. So, I cannot comment further than this.'
Dynopia must be furious right now, lol.
Why would you want no competition? The reason Sony is in the position it is for the next generation is competition from Microsoft. It makes you better.Yep, I am not a fan of Sony, but comapred to MS...
I hope MS and the Xbone financially die a painful death while the shareholders march and burn down Redmond.
Yep, I am not a fan of Sony, but comapred to MS...
I hope MS and the Xbone financially die a painful death while the shareholders march and burn down Redmond.
Wait, $35 of income? Lol
Wow, only $35 net income.
Why would you want no competition? The reason Sony is in the position it is for the next generation is competition from Microsoft. It makes you better.
I like Nintendo, MS dieing= Nintendo might get some RARE IPs back. Someone would fill void anyways.
MS imo has done nothing good for gaming,
Sony has arguably done good and bad for gaming, so has Nintendo, but what good thing has MS done for gaming?
They killed Rareware, and thats all that matters to me anyways, I wont be buying a PS4 or Vita
XBLA?
Quality online services?
Western games on consoles?
XBLA?
Quality online services?
Western games on consoles?
Do not feed the animals. MSFT is teh evil.
XBLA?
Quality online services?
Western games on consoles?
What the hell?
XBLA?
Quality online services?
Western games on consoles?
Well, in a way, we always had western games on consoles.western games would be here anyway, that's not really MS doing. more of a reflection that western studios handled the HD transition better, and Japan is rapidly turning into handheld land.
Definitely.ive and online integration are indisputable though. however "pay for online" is also their fault, so it's not all roses here
Fast turnaround. Kaz was the smartest thing Sony has ever done.
Entrusting the Playstation division to super nerds might be the second by the time this next gen is over.
Those numbers aren't correct btw.
Strange.
Anyway, I think it's irrelevant here because is unlikely that PS3 shipped more units in FY 2012 than FY 2011. Retail sales data don't indicate that.
Those are terrible numbers for a company that size. Investors could do better buying govt bonds than investing in that. They definitely are banking on pa4 to fix a lot .
Fast turnaround. Kaz was the smartest thing Sony has ever done.
Entrusting the Playstation division to super nerds might be the second by the time this next gen is over.
His aggressive smartphone push is very important too.
I think their getting massive confusion on the smartphone lineup however. I wish they'd tone that shit down a bit. How many Experias have launched within the last 2 years?
Do not feed the animals. MSFT is teh evil.
I like Nintendo, MS dieing= Nintendo might get some RARE IPs back. Someone would fill void anyways.
MS imo has done nothing good for gaming,
Sony has arguably done good and bad for gaming, so has Nintendo, but what good thing has MS done for gaming?
They killed Rareware, and thats all that matters to me anyways, I wont be buying a PS4 or Vita
Honestly, the past year's efforts is where it really shined imo. They're really messaging and emphasising the Z really well.
Previous Xperias were messy, but Z is really laser-focused.
I think their getting massive confusion on the smartphone lineup however. I wish they'd tone that shit down a bit. How many Experias have launched within the last 2 years?
I agree. They're running out of alphabet letters to use. Make a high end, mid end and low end phone. That's all you need.
Why would Sony release the ps3 and ps2 numbers together?
He deserves credit for weathering the storm, but the weakening of the Yen is a big reason for the turnaround. Aren't struggling Japanese electronics companies (Panasonic, Sharp, Pioneer, etc.) in general having decent turnarounds now that the Yen has finally weakened?
The Playstation 4 has been handeled extremely well though.
Yep, I am not a fan of Sony, but comapred to MS...
I hope MS and the Xbone financially die a painful death while the shareholders march and burn down Redmond.
Depends. If they determined that loyalty to their fans is how they will succeed long term (and all indications right now are that they did), then yes, it has everything to do with that. But that's just PlayStation.nonsense.
The only reason that Sony is on a roll is because of the competition the MS gave them this gen. Microsoft stole a TON of marketshare from Sony and they want it back. Their current actions are only a means to an end, it has nothing to do with loyalty to their fans.
Okay. Now relating to the ForEx situation. [...] At the last earnings call, I did say that the weakening of the yen, overall, would benefit the company. We report in yen, okay, that has not changed. But at the same time, I said as far as the U.S. dollar is concerned, we have a loss of manufacturing base in dollar-related costs. We have moved a lot of our manufacturing offshore, out of Japan, which -- where costs are related to the dollar. So when the yen weakens, the cost of goods will go up. So on an overall annual basis, the weakening of the yen against the dollar would be a negative hit to our bottom line.[...] For example, Gaming. Since most of the manufacturing in these segments are offshore, the impact is negative and I have to admit that although we are taking various measures to improve the situation, for example, the hit to the bottom line on the Gaming business, I have to say, for the full year, would be a negative impact.
The comparison between the 2 platforms, PlayStation3 and PlayStation4, I think they are -- one big difference is in the amount of investment that we are making in the platform. PS3 was, at that time, the leading-edge product. We developed the LFIs, the CPU and the GPU, from the ground up, working together with our partners in Toshiba and IBM. We spent millions -- hundreds of millions of dollars in designing the chipset. We spent billions of dollars in semiconductor fabrication technology as well as fabrication capacity, building plants, acquiring equipment to fabricate semiconductor. The reason why we did this was there was no chipset around to meet our requirements. There were no manufacturing capacity or technology to manufacture the chipset. So the amount of investment that went into PS3 was quite big. Now PS4, in contrast, is a much more lighter platform in terms of investment because as for the chipset, at the core, we are taking off-the-shelf technology available and we are putting our proprietary technology around that core chipset. So the amount of investment is much, much smaller. In terms of manufacturing, this time, we are totally fabless, meaning that we are relying on our foundries or semiconductor manufacturing companies to supply it for us.
First, about the Game business, the breakdown of the P&L. And I'd like to refrain from citing specific numbers in the -- a further breakdown. But theoretically, as you might know very well and would not need an explanation, but compared to the same period the previous year, PS3 number declined and software business increased. And PSP continues the decline. And PS Vita, as you know, are not performing that well. And PS2 ceased to exist. So top line difference would be there. In R&D cost, I cannot cite any specific numbers. But in terms of the substance, the software development, we have first-party software development, and prior to the actual launch, the expenditure increases for first-party software development. And also, the development tools or the support to third-party developers, that would be included in the cost of development and the increase prior to launch. As we have been saying that -- we have not incurred a tremendous amount of investment for semiconductor development or the development of semiconductor to come up with chipset. We did not make a sizable investment there. Well, partially, there has been some development of chipset. But in terms of the weight of investment, PS4 is a much lighter platform compared to PS3.
That's interesting. Most of their investment with the PS4 has been with software rather than hardware (or at least that's what they seem to be saying).In R&D cost, I cannot cite any specific numbers. But in terms of the substance, the software development, we have first-party software development, and prior to the actual launch, the expenditure increases for first-party software development. And also, the development tools or the support to third-party developers, that would be included in the cost of development and the increase prior to launch. As we have been saying that -- we have not incurred a tremendous amount of investment for semiconductor development or the development of semiconductor to come up with chipset. We did not make a sizable investment there.
XBLA?
Quality online services?
Western games on consoles?
I was like net profit is $35?
That's interesting. Most of their investment with the PS4 has been with software rather than hardware (or at least that's what they seem to be saying).
Kota Ezawa - Citigroup Inc, Research Division
And a further supplementation, if you could. Do you say the development cost for PS4 is not that much? But on a quarterly basis, the deficit is about JPY 15 billion. And the PlayStation3 softwares are still selling. So without the recording of the cost of development, the Game business would have registered a solid profit. Can you say that?
Unknown Executive
Well, I would like to refrain from going into any other details. Thank you. [Japanese] Next question, please? So on this side, on this part, the first line in the middle.
Total software units actually did go up ~20mil this quarter(40 vs 60), YoY, go TLoU!!!