• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Sony could be stopping/changing the PC port strategy?

yurinka

Member
Not sure that would generate the additional sales revenue they want, but it would be awesome for people like me who game on both PS and PC. I guess they could still sell games on Steam alongside the launcher.
Their first party games already generate almost as much as money outside PS than in PS. If they keep adding more games, and save the Valve cut they'll generate more. And if they add 3rd party games, even more.

During a transitional time they'd continue publishing on Steam because the launcher/store would need years to have a big enough PC userbase. But in the long term yes, they could leave Steam.

I'm genuinely losing brain cells
Totoki, Hulst and Nishino mentioned that PC isn't negatively affect their console business: the opposite. Their metrics agree: their console userbase this last year had their all their highest active userbase number in PS history, and are making way more money with 1st party games than before.

On top of this, after starting their PC push they almost broke sales records with 1st party games released every year: TLOU2 (2020), GoWR (2022), Spider-Man 2 (2023), Helldivers (2024), most of them being sequels of games previously released on PC.
 

adamsapple

Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
Your reply is disingenuous since ps5 has nowhere as many units sold in the market as ps4 did when remake came out.

PS5 was sitting at 54 million units sold by Feb '24.

Are you seriously going to use that as a defense? That there weren't enough owners to buy Rebirth? :messenger_tears_of_joy:

We can do mental gymnastics all day

Yes, *we* were wrong about:

- PC being the only place GAAS thrives
- Monster Hunter being GAAS
- Any game with co-op being GAAS
- Some phantom TV spots for the PC version of Rebirth
- Thinking only 5 SP games have done well on Steam

what’s your point? It’s a huge failure on ps5 and a massive success on pc, despite selling a fraction on the pc?

That you're wrong and have sullied a perfectly fine actor and turned him into the bud of many jokes.
 
Last edited:

Ozriel

M$FT
Your reply is disingenuous since ps5 has nowhere as many units sold in the market as ps4 did when remake came out.

There weren’t twice as many PS4s sold as there were PS5 in the market when Rebirth launched, so halved sales tells an obvious story.

Not to mention a lot of the sales of the PS5 is front loaded to the hardcore gamers who are more likely to buy FF day 1. Especially since the previous FF game (XVI) was already current gen exclusive.

The game didn’t sell gangbusters anywhere.
 

HogIsland

Member
~12 month is what Sony considered "normal" exclusivity window. They just normalize 1st party with 3rd party.
We don't really see shrinking of baseline exclusivity window - FF16/FF7:R2/SB or any other 2nd-/3rd-party recent exclusives doesn't had a "shorten" window - still around 1yr. And the 1st sign that Sony go to "day1 PC" should be abandonment of 3rd party deals, which we don't see, game still bought to be exclusive, and some, that Sony seems to deem to be a platform-seller (and those cheap and/or in territories where it matters) - they keep it even away from PC.
They just looking at sales - at what point they make more money going to PC than keeping game exclusively. And it's never a day1.


GaaS always bound to be day1, there were never doubt in it.
You're just inventing 1 year as normal here, when playstation used to be entirely exclusive to their own hardware. the idea that playstation would standardize around a 1 year delay for PC ports would've been almost unthinkable in 2021.

Same with games as a service. Playstation had exclusive gaas games before. As far back as MAG on the PS3. little big planet. Helldivers 2 surpassed expectations. Now with every major game launch, there's a trade off between having the biggest possible launch with PS5 + PC, or missing (conservatively) 30% of players who could buy your game. At the time when you're spending the entire game budget again on marketing for launch. Game sales are notoriously front loaded.

There's no different logic for maximizing CCUs on Marathon as selling $70 copies of The Last of Us 3 on a $500M budget.
 
Last edited:

RCX

Member
Very little of what Sony has done interests me to buy on PC.

Forbidden West was the last game of theirs I played and that taught me to maybe skip a lot of their output in future.
 
  • Like
Reactions: N0S

Damigos

Member
Despite unpopular as an opinion, i actually like exclusives. I see them as the pinnacle of a particular game console/system, the reason to buy it.
Nintendo does it better than anyone, there is a reason to get a Switch and its called Mario/Zelda/Metroid etc.
Therefore i would prefer Sony to stop releasing games on PC, MS releasing games on PS etc etc.
 

Gaiff

SBI’s Resident Gaslighter
“Fastest selling” in 24 hours is a meaningless metric

SM1 sold like 30 million copies and SM2 isn’t close
Because it was remastered for PS5 and PC. Doesn't change the fact that the PS5 had nowhere near the 100M PS4 units Spider-Man had when it was released back in September 2018. It didn't stop Spider-Man 2 from outpacing it. Why can FF use this excuse of user base?
 
Last edited:

James Sawyer Ford

Gold Member
Because it was remastered for PS5 and PC. Doesn't change the fact that the PS5 had nowhere near the 100M PS4 units Spider-Man had when it was released back in September 2018. It didn't stop Spider-Man 2 from outpacing it. Why can FF use this excuse of user base?

It’s not outpacing it, you’re just basing it on some 24 hour worthless stat

Compare first 12 months instead
 
Last edited:

adamsapple

Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
Thanks for proving my point. Doubtful it sold 3 million more by Sept 2024, and even then ps5 sales were closer to 70M by that point, so user base had grown

So what's Rebirth's excuse? Why has it sold less than half the units and has a worse tail an increased user base?

Just how many has it sold exactly, Jim, for you to think the PC version is a failure just 4 days after it came out, by comparison?
 

Kacho

Gold Member
Fox Tv Popcorn GIF by The Four
 

James Sawyer Ford

Gold Member
So what's Rebirth's excuse? Why has it sold less than half the units and has a worse tail an increased user base?

Just how many has it sold exactly, Jim, for you to think the PC version is a failure just 4 days after it came out, by comparison?

Dunno, guess people didn’t like remake and decided to pass on rebirth?

Not the first time that’s happened, XV had a hugely negative impact to the series
 

SlimySnake

Flashless at the Golden Globes
lol It's literally coming out faster than any other AAA game.

If anything, im half expecting Death Stranding 2 and Ghost of Tsushima 2 to launch Day One on PC.

unless of course Herman pulls another 180 like he did with GaaS recently. But thats a pipe dream. They are moving towards Day One with all their games, not just gaas trash like Concord and having Spiderman 2 come out just a year after launch literally points to this.

Helldivers 2 was a also huge on PC, way bigger than it was on PS5 so even if the PC audience doesnt exist for these SP action adventure games, you never know which one will go viral and make them hundreds of millions on PC. At this point, all they care about is cold hard cash.

My guess is that the reason why there hasnt been much marketing on it is because they have seen the poor sales of these action adventure games, and since all they care about is ROI, they see zero point in investing tens of millions in marketing games that will top out at 40k concurrent users at best. this will be the third Spiderman game on there and i think they know not to expect Helldivers 2 numbers so why bother? they will make their $20-30 million from it, and buy themselves a nice bonus by padding their profits.
 

Gaiff

SBI’s Resident Gaslighter
It’s not outpacing it, you’re just basing it on some 24 hour worthless stat

Compare first 12 months instead
No. It also did 5 million in 11 days. That's despite being sold on a platform with what? 50 million units? 60 million? FF doesn't even come close, so the number of consoles on the market is a lame excuse. Games like Spider-Man and FF drive consoles sales, not the other way around. People buy consoles for games, they don't buy games for the consoles.
 

bitbydeath

Member
I think it’s too early for them to change course but they will no doubt be evaluating its success and using that to decide its future.

If you want them to continue, then you must buy them.
 

adamsapple

Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
Dunno, guess people didn’t like remake and decided to pass on rebirth?

Not the first time that’s happened, XV had a hugely negative impact to the series

Ok, so in conclusion, here are the facts:

- None of us know how good / bad Rebirth has sold, we just know from industry trackers that it was selling half of Remake's sales with the outlook that it will have a worse drop-off than Remake over time.
- Square has declined to put out any sales figures over the last year for the console version.
- The PC version has the highest CCU count for a single player FF game on Steam, only behind FF14.

Thank you for your participation.

fs7VLiG.png
 
Last edited:

IntentionalPun

Ask me about my wife's perfect butthole
Looking at the top list of pc games all being GaaS slop, nope.

Pc gamers enjoy their gaming induced GaaS diabetes
3 of the top 5 games right now are single player games. Including one very old game port (RDr 2.)

The list is also based on revenue not sales, hence why GAAS stuff is always on the charts. If Sony did the same you’d see stuff like Fortnite and Genshin Impact at the top every month.

There are single player games that do better on PC and those that do better on consoles. Cherry picking FF7R would be as absurd as cherry picking a Civ game released on PC and console.
 
Last edited:

Kacho

Gold Member
True, that’s why Starfield’s CCUs are a mystery…
Bethesda RPGs have much broader appeal than Final Fantasy games. Especially on PC.

But there is a parallel here. Starfield damaged the appeal of their games, much like Square continues to damage the appeal Final Fantasy had with lackluster games. GOTY noms and inflated metacritic scores won't trick people into liking bad products.
 

James Sawyer Ford

Gold Member
Bethesda RPGs have much broader appeal than Final Fantasy games. Especially on PC.

But there is a parallel here. Starfield damaged the appeal of their games, much like Square continues to damage the appeal Final Fantasy had with lackluster games. GOTY noms and inflated metacritic scores won't trick people into liking bad products.

This only holds true for subsequent releases.

Starfield = bad, next game tarnished

FF7R = good, next game will improve

FF7R should help restore confidence in the brand despite selling at a slower clip

I think FF7 is just too entrenched to justify 3 games, most people don’t want to have that kind of investment
 
Last edited:

Firestartah

Banned
So are sales on PC.
If you say so lil bro
Capcom says PC will remain their main platform:

Capcom Now Sells More Units On PC Than All Three Consoles Combined

Just cause your late to the party rEmAsTeReD slop doesnt do as much as new games on PC doesnt change the fact that PC is the sensation platform right now.
 
If you say so lil bro
Capcom says PC will remain their main platform:

Capcom Now Sells More Units On PC Than All Three Consoles Combined

Just cause your late to the party rEmAsTeReD slop doesnt do as much as new games on PC doesnt change the fact that PC is the sensation platform right now.
I'm not wanting to divert your opinion, but I wanted to give my input.

1. We have people complaining about Dragon Dogma's PC optimization which, y'know...kinda goes against the article's "Capcom prioritizes PC Platform" over others. Plus, we have gamers who are not happy about the system requirements for Monster Hunter Wilds.

2. Doesn't that article say it's because of the low price of the game's retail + huge discounts Steam has?
 

mckmas8808

Mckmaster uses MasterCard to buy Slave drives

They don't need to go full exclusive. Nor should they keep decreasing the time to put their games on PC. It's a medium to long term loser for Sony if they go that route. Apple and Nintendo understand this VERY well.
 

Ozriel

M$FT
They don't need to go full exclusive. Nor should they keep decreasing the time to put their games on PC. It's a medium to long term loser for Sony if they go that route. Apple and Nintendo understand this VERY well.

Quite the pivot. Your previous post insinuated you wanted them to go full exclusive.
 

poppabk

Cheeks Spread for Digital Only Future
The reason to launch it with zero marketing is because Square wasted a ton of money on advertising for FF7R only for it to have less CCUs than a 2D remake of dragon quest

Dead money, pc players don’t buy these SP games.
The reason not to advertise is because these games have been out for months already and are trading on their actual reception rather than pure hype.
Plus advertising is expensive. A $3 million porting job only needs approx 75000 copies sold at $60 to be in profit.
 

BennyBlanco

aka IMurRIVAL69
They don't need to go full exclusive. Nor should they keep decreasing the time to put their games on PC. It's a medium to long term loser for Sony if they go that route. Apple and Nintendo understand this VERY well.

Sony first party simply isn’t on the same level as Nintendo in terms of sales, IP strength, output, or variety. Switch selling 100M+ nearly all on the back of their first party output. Legitimately nobody else could do what they do. You might like Sony’s game’s better but they aren’t the same. Even the terrible modern Pokemon games sell a ton.
 
Top Bottom