The Experiment said:I'm not sour grapes but the DS's upcoming software lineup isn't as good as people are making it out to be. Its just that E3 shock factor because Sony decided for whatever reason to ignore the PSP entirely.
Jagernaut said:I think the current US PSP software lineup is much better than the current US DS lineup, and i am looking forward to more upcoming PSP games than DS games. IMO the only thing holding back PSP sales is the cost of the system. Sony should try to cut the price as soon as possible.
Good point.jarrod said:Media also brings a notable durability issue. Optical formats are instrinsically more fragile than solid state, which weights heavily into DS favor. Nintendo and SCEI also have a certain... erm... track record with the durability of their platforms. I don't really think awarding DS the "durability" prize is much of a stretch here, and really it is a primary concern for many buying a handheld.
But the original Game Boy ran on alkaline batteries, right? That would make better battery life an economic issue, rather than a performance one. (If people went with Ni-Cd instead of alkalines, then it would turn into a performance issue -- those were notoriously low-capacity.)Battery life has always been a primary concern for handhelds though, it was instrumental in the original Game Boy's massive success iover it's competitors. I'm inclined to agree that both PSP (5-6 hrs) and DS (8-10 hrs) are "good enough" though, despite DS' slim lead.
Deku said:Talk is cheap. Prove it.
Red Scarlet said:Just counter the 'DS has a better game library (right now/this year)' with 'it has to, that is all the DS can do' or something.![]()
I own neither, but I'd get a PSP way before a DS if they had emulators. The DS, it's pen gimmick, and the games for it don't interest me at all one bit (aside from FF3 which was canned? again).
And as some people said, the whole PSP is going to take handheld gaming mainstream like ps did with consoles doesn't make sense, since the gameboys were already about as mainstream as it gets (Consider how little coverage GBA got in the gaming press compared to PS2/Xbox/GC, yet it sold on par with PS2).
Let us know when you actually establish such a majority consensus then and your methodology for establishing the "gamer population" within which this applies. Hopefully it won't be so arbitrarily restrictive as to exclude a population of gamers like the ones summarized over at Gamerankings.com who have yet to put Kirby at a higher overall score than the two best reviewed games on the PSP, Lumines and Wipeout Pure.borghe said:is it fact? no, but when a majority population carries an opinion, it is definitely the next closest thing.
turok4n64 said:why dont we just agree that in 05 the DS > PSP?
Sure, which also why I think PSP/DS are "good enough". I personally don't mind recharging at all.-jinx- said:But the original Game Boy ran on alkaline batteries, right? That would make better battery life an economic issue, rather than a performance one. (If people went with Ni-Cd instead of alkalines, then it would turn into a performance issue -- those were notoriously low-capacity.)
kaching said:Let us know when you actually establish such a majority consensus then and your methodology for establishing the "gamer population" within which this applies. Hopefully it won't be so arbitrarily restrictive as to exclude a population of gamers like the ones summarized over at Gamerankings.com who have yet to put Kirby at a higher overall score than the two best reviewed games on the PSP, Lumines and Wipeout Pure.![]()
Vieo said:No matter how you look at it, that's the general consensus of the public(sales have dictacted such). The problem is those living here on 'GAF Island' can't see or just refuse to look over the horizon.
chinch said:Other than damage control, why bring the DS sales into this? The facts are that Sony lowered demand expectations SIGNIFICANTLY for PSP.
i don't read "bickering". they're NOT "inextricably linked" whatsoever except among zealots debating nonsense.sonycowboy said:Have you not read this thread at all? The past several pages have all been about how the DS and PSP are compared and contrasted and thus are affecting each other. They are inextricably linked and most of us have known that for a long time. Other than gloating and restating the initial thread subject, do you have anything to add?
chinch said:i don't read "bickering". they're NOT "inextricably linked" whatsoever except among zealots debating nonsense.
Nin/DS has an audience for children w/ backwards compatability to a "gameboy"
PSP has an audience for older tekkies
kaching said:But my argument isn't about the size of crowds, its about the VOLUME of unwarranted criticism that flew back and forth and continues to do so. It's been significant on both sides, regardless of how many people you think comprises each side.
However, unwarranted criticism aimed at the PSP did not come strictly from DS fans and nothing I've said so far has pegged this strictly to DS fans. Just like unwarranted criticism of the DS wasn't coming strictly from PSP fans.
Of course it's not going "as planned on GAF" 'cause real world people don't obsess over a bulky PSP device with no game library at $250sonycowboy said:That's not the way it's turning out. DS seems to be appealing to a wider audience, IMO. and the PSP is not as appealing to the older techies as many thought.
It appears they might just prefer to stay with consoles / PC's / iPod's. Thus some of Sony's current problems. They are going after a demographic that had little history buying handheld systems and the thought was, it's a market that can be tapped into and marketed to and thus expand the market. It appears a good bit more work needs to be done in this area.
sonycowboy said:That's not the way it's turning out. DS seems to be appealing to a wider audience, IMO. and the PSP is not as appealing to the older techies as many thought. It appears they might just prefer to stay with consoles / PC's / iPod's. Thus some of Sony's current problems.
They are going after a demographic that had little history buying handheld systems and the thought was, it's a market that can be tapped into and marketed to and thus expand the market. It appears a good bit more work needs to be done in this area.
It would be much closer to the DS in terms of hardware, then. A little too close, perhaps, for sony's own good.Tellaerin said:I don't think the PSP's selling all that poorly, all things considered. However, I think Sony might have done better to adopt a more Nintendo-like approach by first setting an affordable target price (say $200), then revising the system specs downward as necessary to meet it (so for $200, let's say something on par with the Dreamcast). A $200 handheld with Dreamcast-quality visuals would have still been powerful enough to impress, and I suspect the price would have made a very real difference in terms of sales. As manufacturing prices dropped, they could have lowered the price of the original unit to coincide with the release of a more powerful, backwards-compatible 'PSP 2' at the same $200 price point.
I think you need to take a closer look at what I was responding to understand the point I made.jman2050 said:You mean the sample which represents, at most, 0.0001% of the total population of gamers? Come on, I assumed you knew better than to bring something as arbitrary as review scores into this debate -_-
No, that's not what I'm talking about at all. I'm not talking about acclaim vs. criticism here, I'm talking about signal:noise ratio. I'm talking about people who clearly have an axe to grind rather than a desire to contribute constructively to a conversation.RE4 vs. SH4 said:So, let me get this straight... if a Sony software release generated 50 replies in a thread - 25 of them being seperate people praising the game, the other 25 made by 5 Nintendo fans bitching relentlessly - you would say the game got as much criticism as it did acclaim, in that thread? That's pretty strange logic, but as long as you're consistant with it...
No shit, sherlock. People with an agenda are who I've been talking about from the start.I don't know; I never see unwaranted criticism against a game or console unless the person leveling it has an agenda.
Who said anything about people not interested in the handheld battle? People truly uninterested in the handheld battle wouldn't be commenting on it. But you don't specifically have to be a fan of handheld gaming to take interest in the handheld battle - there are some who think handheld gaming is an aberration and as such any resources devoted to it are resources inappropriately diverted from the 'true' path of videogaming: the latest and greatest set-top console hardware. And then there are people who have a chip on their shoulder about one company or the other and so therefore take an interest in anything that company does as a potential source for heckling material.Give me some examples of unwarranted criticism dished out by people not interested in the handheld battle.
Deku said:
sonycowboy said:Hey! Can you post that link again. I missed it 6 posts ago!
A good portion of it, yes, but not all of it. And its three pages, rather than a 10 pg bashfest, as a result of the higher signal:noise ratio. Thanks for helping to make my point.Deku said:Check this link:
All criticisms, all warranted.
kaching said:A good portion of it, yes, but not all of it. And its three pages, rather than a 10 pg bashfest, as a result of the higher signal:noise ratio. Thanks for helping to make my point.
kaching said:No, that's not what I'm talking about at all. I'm not talking about acclaim vs. criticism here, I'm talking about signal:noise ratio. I'm talking about people who clearly have an axe to grind rather than a desire to contribute constructively to a conversation.
No shit, sherlock. People with an agenda are who I've been talking about from the start.
Who said anything about people not interested in the handheld battle? People truly uninterested in the handheld battle wouldn't be commenting on it.
But you don't specifically have to be a fan of handheld gaming to take interest in the handheld battle - there are some who think handheld gaming is an aberration and as such any resources devoted to it are resources inappropriately diverted from the 'true' path of videogaming: the latest and greatest set-top console hardware. And then there are people who have a chip on their shoulder about one company or the other and so therefore take an interest in anything that company does as a potential source for heckling material.
That's a lot of pics of naked girlfriends..hacked said:I have been responsible for the purchases of 5-6 PSPs![]()
No, its not beside the point, its very much PART of the point. It does nothing but contribute to the problem I originally described, wherein I didn't single out one group or the other as being significantly more innocent than the other.Deku said:This wasn't a bashfest until the damage control started. Actually it was well on its way to being pushed to page two. And FYI the bashing came mainly from the PSP supporters blaming everyone but Sony for this piece of bad news. The fact that some posters felt they had to gloat about Sony's situtation is beside the point, considering how DS fans were treated a few months back, I think it's almost warranted.
My indignance is very real regarding the pathology I originally described. Beyond that I have no indignance over the cut projections for PSP manufacturing, since my own predictions have been more modest than Sony's.At the end of the day, Sony is still going to cut their projections down to 12 million and that was what was originally being discussed, before posters like you feigned indignance about this whole situation and started it off topic. Go scream at Sony for fucking up the PSP launches or the lack there of in Europe.
Come on, you're walking right into this. Why is it important to you to take me to task for saying something about it? So I made a little noise about behavior I didn't like. Who cares? Well, apparently, at least a few of you do.RE4 vs. SH4 said:I don't see why this is important. So a few fanboys make a lot of noise. Who cares?
It is obvious, but it was you who originally asked me to give "examples of unwarranted criticism dished out by people not interested in the handheld battle" out of the blue, because I was never referring to such people. Hence the followup comment.You don't have to be interested in how a handheld sells versus its closest competitor to be interested in the machine itself, or to contribute your views on its shortcomings and potential profitability. But I thought that was obvious.
It is crappy, but don't act like there aren't a number of GAFers with a running bias against a specific company around here. And I didn't single out Sony as the only recipient of such negativity, so I don't know why you are.Ah, yes, the evil boogeymen out to get Sony for hardware that doesn't compete with their interests. I've seen enough of this type of crap with Deepthroat and his Gamespot conspiracy theories.
"10 bucks! They should be 10 bucks! You can ONLY watch them on the PSP for gods sake... I feel like I'm living in a crazy town!"
Since launch, there have been a mess of UMD movie releases, but there hasn't been many game releases.MetalAlien said:I was at Best Buy today, the number of game tittles for the PSP looks unchange... maybe there's more, but at first glance it looksa the same! Shouldn't there be a whole section of just games now?
Bing! I still find it funny though. A friend of mine took the time to show me a movie playing on the system, and when he told me the price I laughed out loud. We then spent the next hour playing Advanced wars 2 on my DS, and Super Mario64. He said he bought the PSP becuase it "was like having a mini-PS2". I told him just buy the game on the PS2, and he gave me a stupid look.DCharlie said:indeed - BUT Sony would simply point you to the sales of UMD movies (which i believe are fairly strong).
UMD movies have an element of risk in their distribution because there isn't the established userbase of DVD, so the plan could be to either go low cost and hope everyone buys the item, or remain high cost and see what happens.
What the UMD companies are doing, whilst i think the price is stupid, is RIGHT in a business sense. It's much easier to bring a cost down than it is to put it up. If people are stupid enough to pay $30 for a UMD movie, then i tip my hat to the companies taking in the cash.
moku said:30$movie? WTF? Just get a portable DVD player, and buy the damn DVD. It would be cheaper to buy that, and a DS, then get a PSP almost.