Samsung employ Koreans and buy parts from companies using North Korean labour from the Kaesong industrial park. Sony employ mostly Japanese assembly with a few factories in Eastern Europe and Mexico that screw a few things together and they buy parts from Sharp and AUO who do not have access to cheap North Korean labour. That's the basic problem. .
Has anybody tried the SRS X9 or the X7? Is the price diference worth it? I'm thinking of buying the X9, but I think it may be to much for my needs.
Whoever told you this is bullshitting you. I'm kind of afraid that you came to this conclusion on your own. They have no presence there. Infact, I don't think you know what exactly goes on there.
Numerous FTA have kaesong built parts excluded. It's a grey area that is focused on heavily, even on the FTA that Korea has with the U.S.
Before you start pointing problems at labor and whatnot I think you should do more research on the company that is bleeding billions of dollars that you love so much. Their industrial base comes from the same part of the world that Samusng's does: China and Vietnam.
I would primarily blame the Japanese economic stagnation, currency valuations and trade agreements. They're behind the Koreans on many fronts. Cheers.
Eesh, that's tough man. I have one of their 46 inch bravias going on 4 years, Love the tv to death.
Sony has an amazing design staff but incompetent managers and executives.
I was rocking this back in 2003. The first version didn't even play MP3s which lead them to lose the portable audio market to the Ipod
I'm certainly considering dumping my 600D for the A6000
Overall Conclusion
The a6000 is one of Sony's first E-mount cameras to eschew the NEX branding that first introduced the company's range of mirrorless cameras around four years ago. And, while it may look very similar to the NEX-6 that preceded it, the cumulative effect of the changes means it's a very different camera. In part that's because of the rate of technological progress at Sony, but it's also because Sony has finally decided to pair a fully photographer-focused user interface with its impressive image makers.
So, while the a6000 may see its viewfinder downgraded compared to the NEX-6, just about everything else is a step forward. And this isn't just a step forward for Sony: we've not before seen a camera at this price able shoot so fast and track focus so well, nor one that offers such complete control over its movie shooting. And, for that matter, it's not just a step forward for mirrorless cameras: we'd struggle to think of another camera in this price bracket that offers so much in the way of stills and video capability in such a coherent package.
The final word
The a6000 is a really solid camera and is better than its predecessor in almost every respect - anyone worried about Sony cutting corners to hit a lower price point should be reassured that it has done so intelligently. The result is a really capable camera, offering impressive image quality in both Raw and JPEG modes, plus class-leading video features. That it then does so in a small, convenient, well featured and competitively priced package is what really seals the deal for us. It's strong in all areas and outstanding in some.
Eh, not really, Sony lost because they went with the crazy ass expensive MD format, while others went with MP3. They didn't went with MP3, because they probably associated it with piracy. When they finally released their digital music players it was already too late and they STILL didn't support mp3 like you said, but their own atrac format. Stubborn Sony is stubborn.
Still waiting on that Xperia Z2 release in the Western hemisphere...