• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

South Carolina ex-police officer indicted in Walter Scott killing

Status
Not open for further replies.
V

VistraNorrez

Member
This juror can "in good conscience" be okay with another human being be shot in the back to death, though?

Come on, he has no conscience.
 
R

Redd

Member
As long as you're a cop you can get away with pretty much anything. This is why we need serious police reform. -_-
 
A

AlteredBeast

Fork 'em, Sparky!
Likely to be declared a mistrial anf hopefully get 12 people with a conscience involved for a retrial. Nobody shoots an unarmed man running away from them, and later plants evidence who isn't guilty of murder. That person should be ashamed.

Would they convict if the shooter was black and the victim white? Of course. Would they convict if the victim was someone they knew? Of course. What a racist or completely mentally incompetent (and still likely racist) piece of garbage who obviously lied to get past voir dire.
 
D

DrForester

Kills Photobucket
Absolutely disgusting that one juror just doomed this family to more years of knowing their family member's killer walks free. He was shot in the back.

Judge should have just replaced him. He clearly lied at some point in the process if he couldn't even "in good conscience" vote for manslaughter.

2real4tv said:
This is bad. A badge is a free license to murder. What was the jury make up?
Click to expand...

I seem to remember reading somewhere that it was only 1 black person on the jury. No clue on the gender make up or if the 11 others were all white or not.
 
J

johnny956

Member
Amazing, the most clear cut case we've seen and still mistrial. Hopefully they try the case again and get a guilty verdict
 
M

Mark L

Member
Yes it is awful that the family has to go through this, but it could have been much, much worse. At least the judge has enough decency to recognize that justice was not being done.
 
O

Ogodei

Member
Post fact world. Just because he was running away unarmed in the video didn't mean he wasn't threatening the officer with a gun.
 
T

theignoramus

Member
Chief Justice Roger B. Taney said:
They had for more than a century before been regarded as beings of an inferior order, and altogether unfit to associate with the white race, either in social or political relations; and so far inferior, that they had no rights which the white man was bound to respect; and that the negro might justly and lawfully be reduced to slavery for his benefit."
Click to expand...
The spirit of the Dred Scott decision lives on in America's justice system. Those 11 White jurors were selected because this result was intended.
 
shadow_shogun

shadow_shogun

Member
DrForester said:
Absolutely disgusting that one juror just doomed this family to more years of knowing their family member's killer walks free. He was shot in the back.

Judge should have just replaced him. He clearly lied at some point in the process if he couldn't even "in good conscience" vote for manslaughter.



I seem to remember reading somewhere that it was only 1 black person on the jury. No clue on the gender make up or if the 11 others were all white or not.
Click to expand...
Taken from http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1307971&highlight=

CHARLESTON, S.C. — A nearly all-white jury was seated Wednesday for the murder trial of a white former South Carolina officer whose fatal shooting of a black man stunned the nation after it was recorded on a cellphone by a bystander.

A jury of six white men, five white women and one black man will hear the case of Michael Slager, charged with murder in the April 2015 shooting death of 50-year-old Walter Scott as he fled a traffic stop in North Charleston.
Click to expand...
 
A

aquavelva

Member
BenjiGAF said:
What an odd thing to say. To what end do you hope that information leaks?
Click to expand...

ShOcKwAvE said:
Um, no, this is dangerous.
Click to expand...

Nekofrog said:
What exactly are you advocating for
Click to expand...

They need to reveal his information so we know who the white supremacists are. The only reason that juror didn't convict is because the murderer was white and the victim was black and he needs to exposed so he never enters a jury box again when black people are involved.
 
K

Kreed

Member
DrForester said:
Judge should have just replaced him. He clearly lied at some point in the process if he couldn't even "in good conscience" vote for manslaughter.
Click to expand...

^This, or just remove the juror all together/make the decision with a smaller jury if no alternate jurors were available.
 
S

ShOcKwAvE

Member
aquavelva said:
They need to reveal his information so we know who the white supremacists are. The only reason that juror didn't convict is because the murderer was white and the victim was black and he needs to exposed so he never enters a jury box again when black people are involved.
Click to expand...

This is so blatantly ignorant that I don't even know how to respond. The juror might be racist, but only the other jurors know what they discussed, so I'd keep my fingers off the keyboard for a while if I were you.
 
Mister Wolf

Mister Wolf

Member
aquavelva said:
They need to reveal his information so we know who the white supremacists are. The only reason that juror didn't convict is because the murderer was white and the victim was black and he needs to exposed so he never enters a jury box again when black people are involved.
Click to expand...

True story. Fuck that juror.
 
V

Vena

Member
Link said:
I'd put money on him not being retried. I have absolutely no faith in our justice system.
Click to expand...

10 to 1 guilty from the Jury, he'll be retried.

They'll also screen more carefully for racist asshats, and the hold-out here will never sit on another jury bench again.
 
B

Borgnine

MBA in pussy licensing and rights management
aquavelva said:
They need to reveal his information so we know who the white supremacists are. The only reason that juror didn't convict is because the murderer was white and the victim was black and he needs to exposed so he never enters a jury box again when black people are involved.
Click to expand...

If he's ever called for jury duty again his involvement in this trial will be discovered during selection. Then a lawyer will ask that he's dismissed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Ridley Scott interview - sharks in the colosseum, Maximus returning from the afterlife to kill Jesus Christ, asleep at the wheel for Prometheus
45
2K
dem replied
Woman kills her husband with eye drops
30
3K
Constant Flux replied
'Blue Lives Matter" sign put up near site where Walter Scott was killed by the police
2 3
106
14K
Gentleman Jack replied
Fortnite has quietly removed police cars
2 3
111
6K
Rossco EZ replied
  • Locked
Jury in Michael Slager (cop who shot a man in the back) trial has been selected.
2 3 4 5
247
33K
F34R replied
Top Bottom